Abstract
Addition of power activator increased the efficacy of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 80 and 100 g ha−1 on grassy weeds in wheat. The efficacy of this herbicide at 120 g ha−1 was not affected due to addition of surfactant. Fenoxaprop at 100 g ha−1 with or without surfactant produced wheat grain yields at par with weed-free treatment and clodinafop propargyl at 400 g ha−1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Power activator improved fenoxaprop efficacy on grassy weeds at 80 g ha−1.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- power activatore0
- Interactor
- grassy weedse0weed
- Outcome
- efficacy of fenoxaprop-p-ethyle0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- 80e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Addition of power activator increased the efficacy of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 80 and 100 g ha−1 on grassy weeds in wheat.”
Claim · model-written summary
Power activator improved fenoxaprop efficacy on grassy weeds at 100 g ha−1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- power activatore0
- Interactor
- grassy weedse0weed
- Outcome
- efficacy of fenoxaprop-p-ethyle0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- 100 g ha−1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Addition of power activator increased the efficacy of fenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 80 and 100 g ha−1 on grassy weeds in wheat.”
Claim · model-written summary
Surfactant did not affect fenoxaprop efficacy at 120 g ha−1.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- addition of surfactante0
- Outcome
- efficacy of this herbicidee0
- Direction
- not affectede0
- Qualifier
- 120 g ha−1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The efficacy of this herbicide at 120 g ha−1 was not affected due to addition of surfactant.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Fenoxaprop at 100 g ha−1 with surfactant gave wheat yields at par with weed free treatment.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Fenoxaprop at 100 g ha−1 with or without surfactante0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Comparator
- weed-free treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fenoxaprop at 100 g ha−1 with or without surfactant produced wheat grain yields at par with weed-free treatment and clodinafop propargyl at 400 g ha−1.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fenoxaprop at 100 g ha−1 gave wheat yields at par with clodinafop at 400 g ha−1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Fenoxaprop at 100 g ha−1e0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Qualifier
- 400 g ha−1e0
- Comparator
- clodinafop propargyle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fenoxaprop at 100 g ha−1 with or without surfactant produced wheat grain yields at par with weed-free treatment and clodinafop propargyl at 400 g ha−1.”
The same questions in other papers
surfactant · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →surfactant · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →activator · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.