Paper · 2018 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Induction of systemic tolerance to Tilletia indica in wheat by plant defence activators

Prem Lal Kashyap; Satvinder Kaur; Pushpinder Pal Singh Pannu

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plant defence activators viz., benzo(1,2,3)thiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid S-methyl ester, β-aminobutyric acid and salicylic acid at 1 mM dosage were evaluated to manage Tilletia indica and cent percent protection was achieved under glass house conditions. Further, efforts were made to dissect expression pattern of pathogenesis-related genes which are downstream components of the systemic acquired resistance (SAR) pathway in response to primed compounds and T. indica infection, based on real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of marker gene expression levels. Maximal accumulation of PDF1.2 transcripts followed by PR1 and PR5 in independently primed wheat spikes with all tested compounds at three days post-inoculation was observed. Additionally, plant defence activators primed the plant for a rapid and intense response to pathogen infection involving augmented activation of salicylic acid (SA) – and jasmonic acid (JA)/ethylene (ET)-mediated defence response and enhanced level of wheat protection. Therefore, the use of plant defence activators to induce SAR could be used as a management strategy for reducing the impact of T. indica for quality and nutritious wheat production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The defence activators gave complete protection against Tilletia indica under glasshouse conditions.

Treatment
Plant defence activatorse0
Interactor
Tilletia indicaTilletia indicae0pathogen
Outcome
protectione0
Direction
cent percent protectione0
Value
cent percente0
Setting
glass house conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tilletia indica
Tilletia indica · InteractorThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID k8389-2 (next) . · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant defence activators viz., benzo(1,2,3)thiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid S-methyl ester, β-aminobutyric acid and salicylic acid at 1 mM dosage were evaluated to manage Tilletia indica and cent percent protection was achieved under glass house conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PDF1.2 transcripts accumulated maximally in primed wheat spikes at three days after inoculation.

Organ / stage
spikese0
Gene
PDF1.2e0
Outcome
accumulation of PDF1.2 transcriptse0
Direction
Maximale0
Qualifier
three days post-inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximal accumulation of PDF1.2 transcripts followed by PR1 and PR5 in independently primed wheat spikes with all tested compounds at three days post-inoculation was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–744 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PR1 transcripts accumulated after PDF1.2 in primed wheat spikes.

Organ / stage
spikese0
Gene
PR1e0
Outcome
accumulatione0
Direction
Maximale0
Qualifier
three days post-inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximal accumulation of PDF1.2 transcripts followed by PR1 and PR5 in independently primed wheat spikes with all tested compounds at three days post-inoculation was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–744 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PR5 transcripts accumulated after PDF1.2 in primed wheat spikes.

Organ / stage
spikese0
Gene
PR5e0
Outcome
accumulatione0
Direction
Maximale0
Qualifier
three days post-inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximal accumulation of PDF1.2 transcripts followed by PR1 and PR5 in independently primed wheat spikes with all tested compounds at three days post-inoculation was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–744 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defence activators primed a rapid and intense response to pathogen infection involving salicylic acid and jasmonic acid/ethylene signalling.

Treatment
plant defence activatorse0
Outcome
rapid and intense response to pathogen infectione0
Qualifier
augmented activation of salicylic acid (SA) – and jasmonic acid (JA)/ethylene (ET)-mediated defence responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant defence activators primed the plant for a rapid and intense response to pathogen infection involving augmented activation of salicylic acid (SA) – and jasmonic acid (JA)/ethylene (ET)-mediated defence response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defence activators enhanced wheat protection.

Treatment
plant defence activatorse0
Outcome
wheat protectione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant defence activators primed the plant for a rapid and intense response to pathogen infection involving augmented activation of salicylic acid (SA) – and jasmonic acid (JA)/ethylene (ET)-mediated defence response and enhanced level of wheat protection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–1014 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose defence activators to induce SAR and reduce the impact of T. indica on wheat production.

Interactor
T. indicaTilletia indicae0pathogen
Outcome
use of plant defence activators to induce SARe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tilletia indica
Tilletia indica · InteractorThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID k8389-2 (next) . · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of plant defence activators to induce SAR could be used as a management strategy for reducing the impact of T. indica for quality and nutritious wheat production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1196 · show in text ↑

activator · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.