Abstract
Plant defence activators viz., benzo(1,2,3)thiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid S-methyl ester, β-aminobutyric acid and salicylic acid at 1 mM dosage were evaluated to manage Tilletia indica and cent percent protection was achieved under glass house conditions. Further, efforts were made to dissect expression pattern of pathogenesis-related genes which are downstream components of the systemic acquired resistance (SAR) pathway in response to primed compounds and T. indica infection, based on real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of marker gene expression levels. Maximal accumulation of PDF1.2 transcripts followed by PR1 and PR5 in independently primed wheat spikes with all tested compounds at three days post-inoculation was observed. Additionally, plant defence activators primed the plant for a rapid and intense response to pathogen infection involving augmented activation of salicylic acid (SA) – and jasmonic acid (JA)/ethylene (ET)-mediated defence response and enhanced level of wheat protection. Therefore, the use of plant defence activators to induce SAR could be used as a management strategy for reducing the impact of T. indica for quality and nutritious wheat production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
The defence activators gave complete protection against Tilletia indica under glasshouse conditions.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Plant defence activatorse0
- Interactor
- Tilletia indica
Tilletia indicae0pathogen - Outcome
- protectione0
- Direction
- cent percent protectione0
- Value
- cent percente0
- Setting
- glass house conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Plant defence activators viz., benzo(1,2,3)thiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid S-methyl ester, β-aminobutyric acid and salicylic acid at 1 mM dosage were evaluated to manage Tilletia indica and cent percent protection was achieved under glass house conditions.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
PDF1.2 transcripts accumulated maximally in primed wheat spikes at three days after inoculation.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Organ / stage
- spikese0
- Gene
- PDF1.2e0
- Outcome
- accumulation of PDF1.2 transcriptse0
- Direction
- Maximale0
- Qualifier
- three days post-inoculatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Maximal accumulation of PDF1.2 transcripts followed by PR1 and PR5 in independently primed wheat spikes with all tested compounds at three days post-inoculation was observed.”
Claim · model-written summary
PR1 transcripts accumulated after PDF1.2 in primed wheat spikes.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Organ / stage
- spikese0
- Gene
- PR1e0
- Outcome
- accumulatione0
- Direction
- Maximale0
- Qualifier
- three days post-inoculatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Maximal accumulation of PDF1.2 transcripts followed by PR1 and PR5 in independently primed wheat spikes with all tested compounds at three days post-inoculation was observed.”
Claim · model-written summary
PR5 transcripts accumulated after PDF1.2 in primed wheat spikes.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Organ / stage
- spikese0
- Gene
- PR5e0
- Outcome
- accumulatione0
- Direction
- Maximale0
- Qualifier
- three days post-inoculatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Maximal accumulation of PDF1.2 transcripts followed by PR1 and PR5 in independently primed wheat spikes with all tested compounds at three days post-inoculation was observed.”
Claim · model-written summary
Defence activators primed a rapid and intense response to pathogen infection involving salicylic acid and jasmonic acid/ethylene signalling.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- plant defence activatorse0
- Outcome
- rapid and intense response to pathogen infectione0
- Qualifier
- augmented activation of salicylic acid (SA) – and jasmonic acid (JA)/ethylene (ET)-mediated defence responsee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“plant defence activators primed the plant for a rapid and intense response to pathogen infection involving augmented activation of salicylic acid (SA) – and jasmonic acid (JA)/ethylene (ET)-mediated defence response”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Defence activators enhanced wheat protection.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- plant defence activatorse0
- Outcome
- wheat protectione0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“plant defence activators primed the plant for a rapid and intense response to pathogen infection involving augmented activation of salicylic acid (SA) – and jasmonic acid (JA)/ethylene (ET)-mediated defence response and enhanced level of wheat protection.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors propose defence activators to induce SAR and reduce the impact of T. indica on wheat production.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Interactor
- T. indica
Tilletia indicae0pathogen - Outcome
- use of plant defence activators to induce SARe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“the use of plant defence activators to induce SAR could be used as a management strategy for reducing the impact of T. indica for quality and nutritious wheat production.”
The same questions in other papers
activator · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.