Paper · 2012 · Indian Journal of Entomology

Insecticidal activity of certain plants of zingiberaceae and araceae against Spodoptera litura F. and Plutella xylostella saunders in cabbage

Krishna M. Singh; M. P. Singh; Amish K. Sureja; et al.

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rhizome extracts of different plants viz., Curcuma caesia, C. aromatica, C. longa, Zingiber officinale cv. Nadia, Z. officinale cv. Adi Local, Z. officinale cv. Kekir and Acorus calamus were evaluated for possessing insecticidal properties under the laboratory condition using Spodoptera litura as the test insect. Plants which were found effective under the laboratory condition were selected and further evaluated under field condition against Plutella xylostella. Under the laboratory conditions, hexane and chloroform extracts of A. calamus was found highly effective. Curcuma spp. gave better performance than the Zingiber spp. in similar solvent extracts. Acetone extracts were least effective among the three solvents used. Similarly, under the field conditions, A. calamus hexane extract emerged as the most effective extract with 88.40% reduction of P. xylostella over the untreated control, significantly better than the neem formulation (82.14% reduction). A. calamus chloroform extract (81.70% reduction) was comparable with the neem formulation. C. caesia hexane extract was the best treatment among Curcuma extracts and was at par with A. calamus chloroform extract and neem formulation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acorus calamus hexane and chloroform extracts were highly effective against Spodoptera litura in the laboratory.

Treatment
hexane and chloroform extracts of A. calamuse1
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturae0pest
Outcome
highly effectivee1
Direction
highly effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“using Spodoptera litura as the test insect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–313 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under the laboratory conditions, hexane and chloroform extracts of A. calamus was found highly effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Curcuma extracts performed better than Zingiber extracts against Spodoptera litura in the laboratory.

Treatment
Curcuma spp.e1
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturae0pest
Outcome
better performancee1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
Zingiber spp.e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“using Spodoptera litura as the test insect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–313 · show in text ↑
e1

“Curcuma spp. gave better performance than the Zingiber spp. in similar solvent extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–660 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetone extracts were least effective among three solvents in the laboratory.

Treatment
Acetone extractse0
Outcome
least effectivee0
Direction
leaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“Acetone extracts were least effective among the three solvents used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acorus calamus hexane extract reduced Plutella xylostella by 88.40% over untreated control and exceeded neem formulation significantly.

Treatment
A. calamus hexane extracte0
Interactor
P. xylostellae0pest
Outcome
reduction of P. xylostellae0
Direction
reductione0
Value
88.40%e0
Qualifier
82.14% reductione0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“A. calamus hexane extract emerged as the most effective extract with 88.40% reduction of P. xylostella over the untreated control, significantly better than the neem formulation (82.14% reduction)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acorus calamus chloroform extract reduced Plutella xylostella by 81.70%, comparable to neem formulation.

Treatment
A. calamus chloroform extracte0
Interactor
P. xylostellae2pest
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
81.70%e0
Comparator
neem formulatione0
Setting
field conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“A. calamus chloroform extract (81.70% reduction) was comparable with the neem formulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1057 · show in text ↑
e1

“under the field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–768 · show in text ↑
e2

“P. xylostella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Curcuma caesia hexane extract was the best Curcuma treatment, comparable to A. calamus chloroform extract and neem.

Treatment
C. caesia hexane extracte0
Outcome
best treatmente0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
Curcuma extractse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–141 · show in text ↑
e0

“C. caesia hexane extract was the best treatment among Curcuma extracts and was at par with A. calamus chloroform extract and neem formulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1200 · show in text ↑

Acorus calamus · Spodoptera litura · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Spodoptera litura · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.