Paper · 1995 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Integrated Weed Control in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Amandeep Singh Brar; R. J. S. Thind; L. S. Brar

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experimentswere conducted at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhianaand Cotton Research Station, Abohar during the khartf seasons of 1989 and 1990. Predominant weeds were Trianthema portulacastrum (40.7 - 91.S %) at Ludhiana and Eleusine indica (33.6 - 60.9%) at Abopar. Ail treatments significantly reduced the population and dry matter of weeds and increased the seed cotton yield. At Ludhiana, total weed population recorded 30 days after sowing (DAS) was reduced from 47.5 to 20.6, 12.9 and 13.2 plants/0.25 m2 and that of T. portulacastrum from 44.0 to 14.5, 9.4 and 7.8 plants/0.25 m2 with pre-emergence application of 0.75, 1.50 and 2.25 kg pendimethalin/ha, respectively. With the same treatments, reduction in weed density recorded 30 DAS at Abohar was from 61.8 to 16.8, 13.0 and 9.2 plants/m2 in total weeds, from 6.8 to 4.6, 3.3 and 1.9/0.25 m2in T. portulacastrum, and from 54.0 to 14.0, 13.1 and 9.2, 0.25 m2 in E. indica, respectively. Mean dry matter of weeds recorded 60 DAS was reduced from 3035 kg/ha in unweeded check to a range of 342–1262 kg/ha with different combinations of pendimethalin. Consequently, seed cotton yield increased from 1411 kg/ha in unweeded check to 2061, 2129 and 1991 kg/ha with different combinations of 0.75, 1.50 and 2.25 kg pendimethalin/ha thus registering an increase of 46, 51 and 41 per cent, respectively. In conclusion, it can be stated that pre-mergence application of pendimethalin @ 1.5 kg/ha followed by one hoeing 30 DAS is effective for the control of annual broad leaf and grassy weeds like T. portulacastrum and E. indica in American cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trianthema portulacastrum predominated at Ludhiana.

Interactor
Trianthema portulacastrumTrianthema portulacastrume0weed
Outcome
Predominant weedse0
Setting
Ludhianae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trianthema portulacastrum
Trianthema portulacastrum · InteractorGraham Racher · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Predominant weeds were Trianthema portulacastrum (40.7 - 91.S %) at Ludhiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–231 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eleusine indica predominated at Abohar.

Interactor
Eleusine indicaEleusine indicae0weed
Outcome
Eleusine indica (33.6 - 60.9%)e0
Setting
Abopare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eleusine indica
Eleusine indica · InteractorTauʻolunga · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Eleusine indica (33.6 - 60.9%) at Abopar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments reduced weed population and dry matter significantly.

Treatment
Ail treatmentse0
Outcome
population and dry matter of weedse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ail treatments significantly reduced the population and dry matter of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–353 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments increased seed cotton yield significantly.

Treatment
Ail treatmentse0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ail treatments significantly reduced the population and dry matter of weeds and increased the seed cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin treatments reduced total weed population at Ludhiana.

Outcome
total weed populatione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
30 days after sowing (DAS)e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“total weed population recorded 30 days after sowing (DAS) was reduced from 47.5 to 20.6, 12.9 and 13.2 plants/0.25 m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin treatments reduced T. portulacastrum density at Ludhiana.

Treatment
pre-emergence application of 0.75, 1.50 and 2.25 kg pendimethalin/hae0
Interactor
T. portulacastrumTrianthema portulacastrume0weed
Outcome
T. portulacastrume0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trianthema portulacastrum
Trianthema portulacastrum · InteractorGraham Racher · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“that of T. portulacastrum from 44.0 to 14.5, 9.4 and 7.8 plants/0.25 m2 with pre-emergence application of 0.75, 1.50 and 2.25 kg pendimethalin/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin combinations reduced weed dry matter at 60 DAS.

Treatment
different combinations of pendimethaline0
Outcome
dry matter of weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
342–1262 kg/hae0
Comparator
unweeded checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mean dry matter of weeds recorded 60 DAS was reduced from 3035 kg/ha in unweeded check to a range of 342–1262 kg/ha with different combinations of pendimethalin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin combinations increased seed cotton yield.

Treatment
different combinations of 0.75, 1.50 and 2.25 kg pendimethalin/hae0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unweeded checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“seed cotton yield increased from 1411 kg/ha in unweeded check to 2061, 2129 and 1991 kg/ha with different combinations of 0.75, 1.50 and 2.25 kg pendimethalin/ha thus registering an increase of 46, 51 and 41 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1350 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 1.5 kg/ha pendimethalin followed by hoeing for annual weed control in cotton.

Treatment
pre-mergence application of pendimethalin @ 1.5 kg/ha followed by one hoeing 30 DASe0
Outcome
control of annual broad leaf and grassy weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“pre-mergence application of pendimethalin @ 1.5 kg/ha followed by one hoeing 30 DAS is effective for the control of annual broad leaf and grassy weeds like T. portulacastrum and E. indica in American cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1609 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

49 papers: 43 positive, 6 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

pendimethalin · Trianthema portulacastrum · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · Trianthema portulacastrum · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.