Paper · 2016 · Journal of Cereal Research

Effect of osmotic stress on root architecture and defensive system in wheat genotypes at seedling stage

Sonia Sheoran; Vandita Mittal; Narender Singh; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present investigation was conducted to assess the changes in root architecture and defensive system in contrasting genotypes under PEG induced osmotic stress and to determine the optimum osmotic stress level, which could differentiate the drought resistance among genotypes. Changes in physiological and biochemical characteristics were also evaluated. Seedlings were subjected to osmotic stress by supplementing root medium with three different concentrations of PEG 6000. Results highlighted statistically significant differences in most of the traits for treatment T4 (-1.00MPa) as critical for differentiating the drought tolerant and drought susceptible genotypes at seedling stage itself. Water status and chlorophyll content decreased in all the concentrations of PEG. Increase in the activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase enzyme was observed in drought tolerant genotypes C306 and PBW175 which also suggested their water stress tolerance behavior in comparison to other genotypes. This study provides evidence that the tolerant genotypes are well equipped with better physiological traits and good defensive system. This seedling assay could be used by wheat breeders in their breeding programmes to select drought tolerant wheat genotypes at an early stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The T4 treatment at −1.00 MPa differentiated tolerant and susceptible genotypes in most traits.

Treatment
T4 (-1.00MPa)e0
Outcome
differences in most of the traitse0
Direction
differencese0
Value
-1.00MPae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results highlighted statistically significant differences in most of the traits for treatment T4 (-1.00MPa) as critical for differentiating the drought tolerant and drought susceptible genotypes at seedling stage itself.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water status decreased at all PEG concentrations.

Treatment
all the concentrations of PEGe0
Outcome
Water statuse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water status and chlorophyll content decreased in all the concentrations of PEG.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content decreased at all PEG concentrations.

Treatment
all the concentrations of PEGe0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water status and chlorophyll content decreased in all the concentrations of PEG.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superoxide dismutase activity increased in drought-tolerant C306 and PBW175.

Material
C306e0
Treatment
osmotic stresst0
Gene
superoxide dismutasee0
Outcome
activities of superoxide dismutasee0
Direction
Increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in the activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase enzyme was observed in drought tolerant genotypes C306 and PBW175”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“osmotic stress on root architecture and defensive system in wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Catalase activity increased in drought-tolerant C306 and PBW175.

Material
PBW175e0
Treatment
osmotic stresst0
Gene
catalase enzymee0
Outcome
activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase enzymee0
Direction
Increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in the activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase enzyme was observed in drought tolerant genotypes C306 and PBW175”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“osmotic stress on root architecture and defensive system in wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that tolerant genotypes had stronger physiological traits and defensive systems.

Material
tolerant genotypese0
Outcome
better physiological traits and good defensive systeme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tolerant genotypes are well equipped with better physiological traits and good defensive system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The seedling assay was proposed for early selection of drought-tolerant wheat genotypes.

Outcome
select drought tolerant wheat genotypes at an early stagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This seedling assay could be used by wheat breeders in their breeding programmes to select drought tolerant wheat genotypes at an early stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1280 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 49 positive, 30 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 16 positive, 115 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

206 papers: 60 positive, 146 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

202 papers more in this group

See all 206 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.