Paper · 2012 · PubMed

Potential of antioxidant enzymes in depicting drought tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Rachana Devi; Narinder Kaur; Anil Kumar Gupta

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
81
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In an effort to determine the biochemical markers for identifying genotypes before sowing for drought tolerance, changes in activities of antioxidant enzymes were determined in the seedlings of five drought-tolerant and five drought-sensitive wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes, each with different genetic background growing under normal and water deficit conditions induced by 6% mannitol. In comparison with non-stressed seedlings, the catalase (CAT) activity was upregulated by more than 50% in the roots of water-stressed seedlings in drought-tolerant genotypes. Water deficit stress also led to the upregulation of ascorbate peroxidase (APX) in the endosperms and glutathione reductase (GR), CAT and peroxidase (POD) in the shoots of stressed seedlings in drought-tolerant genotypes. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was very low in roots and shoots and showed non-significant increase under water-stress in tolerant genotypes. Out of five specified enzyme activities (CAT in roots and shoots, APX in endosperms, GR and POD in shoots), if any three are upregulated in the specified tissues under water deficit conditions, the genotype is likely to be drought-tolerant. Wheat seedlings with low GR and APX activities and high POD activity in shoots with a low ratio of GR activity of shoot to root of non-stressed seedlings are likely to perform better under rainfed conditions. The observed data showed that status of antioxidant enzymes could provide a meaningful tool for depicting drought tolerance of a wheat genotype.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased root catalase activity by more than 50% in tolerant genotypes.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
drought-tolerant genotypese0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
water-stressed seedlingse0
Gene
catalase (CAT)e0
Outcome
catalase (CAT) activitye0
Direction
upregulatede0
Value
more than 50%e0
Comparator
non-stressed seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“In comparison with non-stressed seedlings, the catalase (CAT) activity was upregulated by more than 50% in the roots of water-stressed seedlings in drought-tolerant genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit upregulated APX in endosperms of tolerant genotypes.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
endospermse0
Treatment
Water deficit stresse0
Gene
ascorbate peroxidase (APX)e0
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidase (APX)e0
Direction
upregulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Water deficit stress also led to the upregulation of ascorbate peroxidase (APX) in the endosperms and glutathione reductase (GR), CAT and peroxidase (POD) in the shoots of stressed seedlings in drought-tolerant genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit upregulated GR, CAT and POD in shoots of tolerant genotypes.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
Water deficit stresse0
Outcome
glutathione reductase (GR), CAT and peroxidase (POD)e0
Direction
upregulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Water deficit stress also led to the upregulation of ascorbate peroxidase (APX) in the endosperms and glutathione reductase (GR), CAT and peroxidase (POD) in the shoots of stressed seedlings in drought-tolerant genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–793 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD activity was very low in roots and shoots.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
roots and shootse0
Gene
Superoxide dismutase (SOD)e0
Outcome
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activitye0
Direction
very lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was very low in roots and shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD activity increased nonsignificantly under water stress in tolerant genotypes.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Material
tolerant genotypese0
Treatment
water-stresse0
Outcome
Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activitye1
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“showed non-significant increase under water-stress in tolerant genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–940 · show in text ↑
e1

“Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was very low in roots and shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–862 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upregulation of any three of five specified enzyme activities predicts drought tolerance.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Gene
CAT in roots and shoots, APX in endosperms, GR and POD in shootse0
Outcome
drought-tolerante0
Qualifier
if any three are upregulatede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Out of five specified enzyme activities (CAT in roots and shoots, APX in endosperms, GR and POD in shoots), if any three are upregulated in the specified tissues under water deficit conditions, the genotype is likely to be drought-tolerant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1181 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low GR and APX, high POD and a low shoot-to-root GR ratio in unstressed seedlings predict better rainfed performance.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Gene
GR and APXe0
Outcome
perform better under rainfed conditionse0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
low ratio of GR activity of shoot to roote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“Wheat seedlings with low GR and APX activities and high POD activity in shoots with a low ratio of GR activity of shoot to root of non-stressed seedlings are likely to perform better under rainfed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1390 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant enzyme status may serve as a tool for depicting wheat drought tolerance.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
depicting drought tolerancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“status of antioxidant enzymes could provide a meaningful tool for depicting drought tolerance of a wheat genotype.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1535 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 49 positive, 30 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.