Paper · 2008 · Pesticide Research Journal

Development and Promotion of Farmer-Participatory IPM Technology in Irrigated Cotton Cropping System — A Case Study-I

Naved Sabir; T. P. Trivedi; Jitendra Singh; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies on farmer-participatory IPM technology in irrigated high-yielding cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties were carried out for four consecutive years (2001–2004) in two irrigated regions of northern India covering 25 villages in Kahnewal (Punjab) and in 23 villages in Hizrawan Kalan area (Haryana). Both locations are situated in second agro-ecological region of India. During the experimental years, incidence of the insect pests was found to be 69.0 and 74.8% lower in IPM, compared to non-IPM fields in the above locattons, respectively. Jassids and whiteflies populations was found to be 39.3 and 39.6% more in non-PM fields, respectively. The number of amerrcan bbllworm (Helicoverpa armigera) eggs and larvae were elso found to be higher (57.8 and 59.7% more) and 71.9% higher bollworm-incidence in non-IPM fields. Installation technique and number of pheromone traps per hectare was found significantly effective. Overall moth catches were around 60% more in IPM fields at both the experimental locations. Natural enemies of the cotton pests were 33.4% more in IPM than non-IPM fields. The IPM farmers applled 36.3% less insecticide sprays and obtained 16.09 q ha−1 crop yields as compared to 9.85 q ha−1 yield by non-IPM farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM lowered pest incidence by 69.0% in the first region.

Treatment
IPMe0
Interactor
insect pestse0pest
Outcome
incidence of the insect pestse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
69.0e0
Comparator
non-IPM fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“During the experimental years, incidence of the insect pests was found to be 69.0 and 74.8% lower in IPM, compared to non-IPM fields in the above locattons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM lowered pest incidence by 74.8% in the second region.

Treatment
IPMe0
Interactor
insect pestse0pest
Outcome
incidence of the insect pestse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
74.8%e0
Comparator
non-IPM fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“During the experimental years, incidence of the insect pests was found to be 69.0 and 74.8% lower in IPM, compared to non-IPM fields in the above locattons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jassid populations were 39.3% higher in non-IPM fields.

Treatment
non-PMe0
Interactor
Jassidse0pest
Outcome
Jassids and whiteflies populationse0
Direction
moree0
Value
39.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Jassids and whiteflies populations was found to be 39.3 and 39.6% more in non-PM fields, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whitefly populations were 39.6% higher in non-IPM fields.

Treatment
non-PMe0
Interactor
whitefliesAleyrodoideae0pest
Outcome
whiteflies populationse0
Direction
moree0
Value
39.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Jassids and whiteflies populations was found to be 39.3 and 39.6% more in non-PM fields, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bollworm eggs were 57.8% higher in non-IPM fields.

Treatment
non-IPMe0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
Helicoverpa armigera) eggse0
Direction
highere0
Value
57.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The number of amerrcan bbllworm (Helicoverpa armigera) eggs and larvae were elso found to be higher (57.8 and 59.7% more) and 71.9% higher bollworm-incidence in non-IPM fields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bollworm larvae were 59.7% higher in non-IPM fields.

Treatment
non-IPMe0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
larvaee0
Direction
highere0
Value
59.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The number of amerrcan bbllworm (Helicoverpa armigera) eggs and larvae were elso found to be higher (57.8 and 59.7% more) and 71.9% higher bollworm-incidence in non-IPM fields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bollworm incidence was 71.9% higher in non-IPM fields.

Treatment
non-IPMe0
Interactor
bollwormHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
bollworm-incidencee0
Direction
highere0
Value
71.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The number of amerrcan bbllworm (Helicoverpa armigera) eggs and larvae were elso found to be higher (57.8 and 59.7% more) and 71.9% higher bollworm-incidence in non-IPM fields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–830 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pheromone trap installation and number were significantly effective.

Outcome
significantly effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Installation technique and number of pheromone traps per hectare was found significantly effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moth catches were around 60% higher in IPM fields.

Treatment
IPMe0
Interactor
mothe0pest
Outcome
moth catchese0
Direction
moree0
Value
around 60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Overall moth catches were around 60% more in IPM fields at both the experimental locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural enemies were 33.4% more numerous in IPM fields.

Treatment
IPMe0
Interactor
cotton pestse0pest
Outcome
Natural enemies of the cotton pestse0
Direction
moree0
Value
33.4%e0
Comparator
non-IPM fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Natural enemies of the cotton pests were 33.4% more in IPM than non-IPM fields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM farmers applied 36.3% fewer insecticide sprays.

Treatment
IPMe0
Outcome
insecticide sprayse0
Direction
lesse0
Value
36.3%e0
Comparator
non-IPM farmerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The IPM farmers applled 36.3% less insecticide sprays and obtained 16.09 q ha−1 crop yields as compared to 9.85 q ha−1 yield by non-IPM farmers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM yield was 16.09 q ha−1 versus 9.85 q ha−1 for non-IPM.

Treatment
IPMe0
Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
obtainede0
Value
16.09 q ha−1e0
Comparator
non-IPM farmerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The IPM farmers applled 36.3% less insecticide sprays and obtained 16.09 q ha−1 crop yields as compared to 9.85 q ha−1 yield by non-IPM farmers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1247 · show in text ↑

ipm · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

ipm · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

ipm · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

ipm · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

39 papers: 39 positive, 0 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.