Abstract
Studies were carried out to examine the profitability of IPM vis-a-vis non-IPM fanning practices under rainfed conditions. During the study period, higher incidence of natural enemies was observed in IPM and untreated check, while these insects were kept at low in farmers and ETL blocks due to insecticide sprays. In IPM module, the natural enemies were found playing a major role in suppressing the pest populations particularly early season sucking pest complex. The economics of control strategies and the resultant monitory returns revealed that the cost benefit ratio was highest in IPM strategy (4.42) as it required minimum insecticidal interventions. IPM programme successfully resulted in lower production costs through reduced pesticide consumption which ultimately helped in conserving naural enemy species and sustaining biodiversity.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Natural enemy incidence was higher under IPM and untreated check than in farmer and ETL blocks.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- IPMe0
- Outcome
- incidence of natural enemiese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- farmers and ETL blockse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cotton”
e0“higher incidence of natural enemies was observed in IPM and untreated check, while these insects were kept at low in farmers and ETL blocks due to insecticide sprays.”
Claim · model-written summary
Natural enemies suppressed early season sucking pest populations in the IPM module.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- IPM modulee0
- Interactor
- early season sucking pest complexe0pest
- Outcome
- suppressing the pest populationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cotton”
e0“In IPM module, the natural enemies were found playing a major role in suppressing the pest populations particularly early season sucking pest complex.”
Claim · model-written summary
The IPM strategy had the highest cost benefit ratio, 4.42.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- IPM strategye0
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 4.42e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cotton”
e0“the cost benefit ratio was highest in IPM strategy (4.42) as it required minimum insecticidal interventions.”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM required minimum insecticidal interventions.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- IPM strategye0
- Outcome
- insecticidal interventionse0
- Direction
- minimume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cotton”
e0“IPM strategy (4.42) as it required minimum insecticidal interventions.”
Claim · model-written summary
The IPM programme lowered production costs through reduced pesticide consumption.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- IPM programmee0
- Outcome
- production costse0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cotton”
e0“IPM programme successfully resulted in lower production costs through reduced pesticide consumption”
Claim · model-written summary
The IPM programme conserved natural enemies and sustained biodiversity.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Outcome
- conserving naural enemy species and sustaining biodiversitye0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cotton”
e0“which ultimately helped in conserving naural enemy species and sustaining biodiversity.”
The same questions in other papers
ipm · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →ipm · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
38 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.