Paper · 2006 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Efficacy of herbicides in wheat (Triticum aestivum) with special reference to wild oat (Avena sterillis ludoviciana) in vertisols

J. S. Mishra

14
claims
70
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2004–05 and 2005–06 at Jabalpur to assess the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl, sulfosulfuron and isoproturron as post-emergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.). Clodinafop @ 60 g/ha significantly reduced the density and dry matter of wild oat (Avena stereillis ssp. ludoviciana Dur.), but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L. Sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha provided effective control of both wild oat and broad-leaved weeds. Isoproturon 1,000 g/ha did not cause significant reduction in he population and dry matter of wild oat, but significantly reduced the problem of broad-leaved weeds. Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth period caused 48.8% reduction in grain yield of wheat. Higher yield attributes and maximum grain yield (47.6 q/ha) of wheat were recorded from two hand-weedings at 30 and 60 days after sowing (DAS). Amongst herbicidal treatments, application of sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha (43.6 q/ha), being on a par with that of clodinafop 60 g/ha (41.5 q/ha), 120 g/ha (43.4 q/ha) and 240 g/ha (44.5 q/ha), significantly increased the grain yield of wheat and recorded the maximum net return (Rs 11,940/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop at 60 g/ha significantly reduced wild oat density and dry matter.

Treatment
Clodinafop @ 60 g/hae0t0e1e2e3
Interactor
wild oate0t0e1e2e3weed
Outcome
density and dry matter of wild oate0t0e1e2e3
Direction
reducede0t0e1e2e3
Setting
Jabalpure0t0e1e2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clodinafop @ 60 g/ha significantly reduced the density and dry matter of wild oat (Avena stereillis ssp. ludoviciana Dur.), but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2004–05 and 2005–06 at Jabalpur to assess the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl, sulfosulfuron and isoproturron as post-emergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–239 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop @ 60 g/ha significantly reduced the density and dry matter of wild oat (Avena stereillis ssp. ludoviciana Dur.), but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–512 · show in text ↑
e3

“Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth period caused 48.8% reduction in grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop at 60 g/ha did not control broad-leaved weeds.

Treatment
Clodinafop @ 60 g/hae0t0e1e2e3
Interactor
broad-leaved weedse0t0e1e2e3weed
Outcome
problem of broad-leaved weedse0t0e1e2e3
Direction
could not combate0t0e1e2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2004–05 and 2005–06 at Jabalpur to assess the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl, sulfosulfuron and isoproturron as post-emergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–239 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop @ 60 g/ha significantly reduced the density and dry matter of wild oat (Avena stereillis ssp. ludoviciana Dur.), but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–512 · show in text ↑
e3

“Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth period caused 48.8% reduction in grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron at 25 g/ha controlled wild oat.

Treatment
Sulfosulfuron 25 g/hae0t0e1e2e3
Interactor
wild oate0t0e1e2e3weed
Outcome
effective control of both wild oate0t0e1e2e3
Direction
effective controle0t0e1e2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha provided effective control of both wild oat and broad-leaved weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2004–05 and 2005–06 at Jabalpur to assess the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl, sulfosulfuron and isoproturron as post-emergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–239 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop @ 60 g/ha significantly reduced the density and dry matter of wild oat (Avena stereillis ssp. ludoviciana Dur.), but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–512 · show in text ↑
e3

“Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth period caused 48.8% reduction in grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron at 25 g/ha controlled broad-leaved weeds.

Treatment
Sulfosulfuron 25 g/hae0t0e1e2e3
Interactor
broad-leaved weedse0t0e1e2e3weed
Outcome
control of both wild oat and broad-leaved weedse0t0e1e2e3
Direction
effective controle0t0e1e2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha provided effective control of both wild oat and broad-leaved weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2004–05 and 2005–06 at Jabalpur to assess the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl, sulfosulfuron and isoproturron as post-emergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–239 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop @ 60 g/ha significantly reduced the density and dry matter of wild oat (Avena stereillis ssp. ludoviciana Dur.), but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–512 · show in text ↑
e3

“Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth period caused 48.8% reduction in grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon at 1,000 g/ha did not significantly reduce wild oat population or dry matter.

Treatment
Isoproturon 1,000 g/hae0t0e1e2e3
Interactor
wild oate0t0e1e2e3weed
Outcome
population and dry matter of wild oate0t0e1e2e3
Direction
did not cause significant reductione0t0e1e2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isoproturon 1,000 g/ha did not cause significant reduction in he population and dry matter of wild oat, but significantly reduced the problem of broad-leaved weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2004–05 and 2005–06 at Jabalpur to assess the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl, sulfosulfuron and isoproturron as post-emergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–239 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop @ 60 g/ha significantly reduced the density and dry matter of wild oat (Avena stereillis ssp. ludoviciana Dur.), but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–512 · show in text ↑
e3

“Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth period caused 48.8% reduction in grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon significantly reduced broad-leaved weeds.

Treatment
Isoproturon 1,000 g/hae0t0e1e2e3
Interactor
broad-leaved weedse0t0e1e2e3weed
Outcome
problem of broad-leaved weedse0t0e1e2e3
Direction
reducede0t0e1e2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isoproturon 1,000 g/ha did not cause significant reduction in he population and dry matter of wild oat, but significantly reduced the problem of broad-leaved weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2004–05 and 2005–06 at Jabalpur to assess the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl, sulfosulfuron and isoproturron as post-emergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–239 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop @ 60 g/ha significantly reduced the density and dry matter of wild oat (Avena stereillis ssp. ludoviciana Dur.), but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–512 · show in text ↑
e3

“Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth period caused 48.8% reduction in grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Season-long weed infestation reduced wheat grain yield by 48.8%.

Treatment
Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth periode0t0e1e2e3
Interactor
weede0t0e1e2e3weed
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0t0e1e2e3
Direction
reductione0t0e1e2e3
Value
48.8%e0t0e1e2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth period caused 48.8% reduction in grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2004–05 and 2005–06 at Jabalpur to assess the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl, sulfosulfuron and isoproturron as post-emergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–239 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop @ 60 g/ha significantly reduced the density and dry matter of wild oat (Avena stereillis ssp. ludoviciana Dur.), but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–512 · show in text ↑
e3

“Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth period caused 48.8% reduction in grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings yielded maximum wheat grain yield of 47.6 q/ha.

Treatment
two hand-weedings at 30 and 60 days after sowing (DAS)e0t0e1e2e3
Outcome
grain yielde0t0e1e2e3
Direction
maximume0t0e1e2e3
Value
47.6 q/hae0t0e1e2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher yield attributes and maximum grain yield (47.6 q/ha) of wheat were recorded from two hand-weedings at 30 and 60 days after sowing (DAS).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2004–05 and 2005–06 at Jabalpur to assess the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl, sulfosulfuron and isoproturron as post-emergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–239 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop @ 60 g/ha significantly reduced the density and dry matter of wild oat (Avena stereillis ssp. ludoviciana Dur.), but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–512 · show in text ↑
e3

“Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth period caused 48.8% reduction in grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave higher yield attributes.

Treatment
two hand-weedings at 30 and 60 days after sowing (DAS)e0t0e1e2e3
Outcome
yield attributese0t0e1e2e3
Direction
Highere0t0e1e2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher yield attributes and maximum grain yield (47.6 q/ha) of wheat were recorded from two hand-weedings at 30 and 60 days after sowing (DAS).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2004–05 and 2005–06 at Jabalpur to assess the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl, sulfosulfuron and isoproturron as post-emergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–239 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop @ 60 g/ha significantly reduced the density and dry matter of wild oat (Avena stereillis ssp. ludoviciana Dur.), but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–512 · show in text ↑
e3

“Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth period caused 48.8% reduction in grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron at 25 g/ha increased wheat grain yield to 43.6 q/ha.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron 25 g/hae0t0e1e2e3
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0t0e1e2e3
Direction
increasede0t0e1e2e3
Value
43.6 q/hae0t0e1e2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha (43.6 q/ha), being on a par with that of clodinafop 60 g/ha (41.5 q/ha), 120 g/ha (43.4 q/ha) and 240 g/ha (44.5 q/ha), significantly increased the grain yield of wheat and recorded the maximum net return (Rs 11,940/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2004–05 and 2005–06 at Jabalpur to assess the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl, sulfosulfuron and isoproturron as post-emergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–239 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop @ 60 g/ha significantly reduced the density and dry matter of wild oat (Avena stereillis ssp. ludoviciana Dur.), but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–512 · show in text ↑
e3

“Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth period caused 48.8% reduction in grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop at 60 g/ha yielded 41.5 q/ha wheat grain.

Treatment
clodinafop 60 g/hae0t0e1e2e3
Outcome
grain yielde0t0e1e2e3
Value
41.5 q/hae0t0e1e2e3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clodinafop 60 g/ha (41.5 q/ha), 120 g/ha (43.4 q/ha) and 240 g/ha (44.5 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2004–05 and 2005–06 at Jabalpur to assess the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl, sulfosulfuron and isoproturron as post-emergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–239 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop @ 60 g/ha significantly reduced the density and dry matter of wild oat (Avena stereillis ssp. ludoviciana Dur.), but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–512 · show in text ↑
e3

“Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth period caused 48.8% reduction in grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop at 120 g/ha yielded 43.4 q/ha wheat grain.

Treatment
120 g/hae0t0e1e2e3
Outcome
grain yielde0t0e1e2e3
Value
43.4 q/hae0t0e1e2e3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clodinafop 60 g/ha (41.5 q/ha), 120 g/ha (43.4 q/ha) and 240 g/ha (44.5 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2004–05 and 2005–06 at Jabalpur to assess the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl, sulfosulfuron and isoproturron as post-emergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–239 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop @ 60 g/ha significantly reduced the density and dry matter of wild oat (Avena stereillis ssp. ludoviciana Dur.), but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–512 · show in text ↑
e3

“Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth period caused 48.8% reduction in grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop at 240 g/ha yielded 44.5 q/ha wheat grain.

Treatment
240 g/hae0t0e1e2e3
Outcome
grain yielde0t0e1e2e3
Value
44.5 q/hae0t0e1e2e3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clodinafop 60 g/ha (41.5 q/ha), 120 g/ha (43.4 q/ha) and 240 g/ha (44.5 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2004–05 and 2005–06 at Jabalpur to assess the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl, sulfosulfuron and isoproturron as post-emergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–239 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop @ 60 g/ha significantly reduced the density and dry matter of wild oat (Avena stereillis ssp. ludoviciana Dur.), but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–512 · show in text ↑
e3

“Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth period caused 48.8% reduction in grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron had the maximum net return of Rs 11,940/ha.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron 25 g/hae0t0e1e2e3
Outcome
net returne0t0e1e2e3
Direction
maximume0t0e1e2e3
Value
Rs 11,940/hae0t0e1e2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha (43.6 q/ha), being on a par with that of clodinafop 60 g/ha (41.5 q/ha), 120 g/ha (43.4 q/ha) and 240 g/ha (44.5 q/ha), significantly increased the grain yield of wheat and recorded the maximum net return (Rs 11,940/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2004–05 and 2005–06 at Jabalpur to assess the efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl, sulfosulfuron and isoproturron as post-emergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–239 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop @ 60 g/ha significantly reduced the density and dry matter of wild oat (Avena stereillis ssp. ludoviciana Dur.), but could not combat the problem of broad-leaved weeds, viz., Medicago hispida Gaertn., Lathyrus aphaca L., Chenopodium album L. and Vicia sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–512 · show in text ↑
e3

“Infestation of weed throughout the crop-growth period caused 48.8% reduction in grain yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–869 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

clodinafop · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

isoproturon · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 72 positive, 2 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

clodinafop · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

infection · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 32 positive, 51 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.