Abstract
Abstract Background: The push for net-zero CO 2 emission in the energy sector by 2030 has led to massive investments in clean energy sources in several countries. One such investment is in photovoltaics which are substances that convert solar energy into electricity. Due to the large land requirement for the installation of photovoltaic plants, a significant portion of agricultural lands have been converted to photovoltaic facilities in recent times. Land use conflicts between food and energy production are becoming an increasing concern that needs addressing. Agrivoltaics presents an opportunity to integrate crops underneath photovoltaic panels sustainably. The objective of this study was to select genotypes with superior yield advantage and greater stability underneath the APV system. Methods: Five mungbean genotypes, Tvr18, Tvr28, Tvr65, Tvr79, and Tvr 83 were assessed under contrasting APV microenvironments, WPV, EPV and NPV at the National Center for Energy Research, University of Nigeria, Nsukka. The experiment was a split-plot design with APV as the whole-plot factor while genotype was the sub-plot factor with five replications. Results: The additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis showed significant genotype, environment, GxE, IPCA1, and IPCA2 effects ( p < 0.05) for seed weight. Two genotypes, Tvr28 (9.92 g) and Tvr83 (9.58 g) recorded higher seed weights across environments. The EPV environment recorded higher seed weight per plant (10.51 g) than NPV (7.58 g) and WPV (5.44 g) environments, respectively. Tvr18 and Tvr65 were the most unstable genotypes across the APV-environments with higher IPCA1 (−1.75 and 1.30, respectively) and ASV (4.02 and 3.00, respectively) scores in contrast to Tvr83 and Tvr28 with the least IPCA1 (0.19 and 0.09) and ASV (1.23 and 1.18, respectively) scores. Hence, Tvr83 and Tvr28 were more stable across the APV microenvironments and were the best in seed yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Genotype, environment, their interaction, IPCA1 and IPCA2 significantly affected seed weight.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiata
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- genotypee0
- Outcome
- seed weighte0
- Qualifier
- environment, GxE, IPCA1, and IPCA2 effectse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“AMMI) analysis showed significant genotype, environment, GxE, IPCA1, and IPCA2 effects ( p < 0.05) for seed weight”
t0“Vigna radiata”
Claim · model-written summary
Tvr28 recorded 9.92 g seed weight across environments, among the higher genotypes.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Material
- Tvr28e0
- Outcome
- seed weightse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 9.92 ge0
- Qualifier
- across environmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tvr28 (9.92 g) and Tvr83 (9.58 g) recorded higher seed weights across environments”
t0“Vigna radiata”
Claim · model-written summary
Tvr83 recorded 9.58 g seed weight across environments, among the higher genotypes.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Material
- Tvr83e0
- Outcome
- seed weightse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 9.58 ge0
- Qualifier
- across environmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tvr28 (9.92 g) and Tvr83 (9.58 g) recorded higher seed weights across environments”
t0“Vigna radiata”
Claim · model-written summary
The EPV environment yielded 10.51 g seed weight per plant, above NPV and WPV.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- EPV environmente0
- Outcome
- seed weight per plante0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 10.51 ge0
- Qualifier
- 7.58 ge0
- Comparator
- NPVe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The EPV environment recorded higher seed weight per plant (10.51 g) than NPV (7.58 g) and WPV (5.44 g) environments”
t0“Vigna radiata”
Claim · model-written summary
The EPV environment yielded higher seed weight than WPV, which had 5.44 g per plant.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- EPV environmente0
- Outcome
- seed weight per plante0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 5.44 ge0
- Comparator
- WPVe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The EPV environment recorded higher seed weight per plant (10.51 g) than NPV (7.58 g) and WPV (5.44 g) environments”
t0“Vigna radiata”
Claim · model-written summary
Tvr18 was unstable across agrivoltaic environments, with IPCA1 −1.75 and ASV 4.02.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Material
- Tvr18e0
- Outcome
- most unstable genotypese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- −1.75e0
- Qualifier
- 4.02e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tvr18 and Tvr65 were the most unstable genotypes across the APV-environments with higher IPCA1 (−1.75 and 1.30, respectively) and ASV (4.02 and 3.00, respectively) scores”
t0“Vigna radiata”
Claim · model-written summary
Tvr65 was unstable across agrivoltaic environments, with IPCA1 1.30 and ASV 3.00.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Material
- Tvr65e0
- Outcome
- most unstable genotypese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.30e0
- Qualifier
- 3.00e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tvr18 and Tvr65 were the most unstable genotypes across the APV-environments with higher IPCA1 (−1.75 and 1.30, respectively) and ASV (4.02 and 3.00, respectively) scores”
t0“Vigna radiata”
Claim · model-written summary
Tvr83 had low instability scores, IPCA1 0.19 and ASV 1.23.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Material
- Tvr83e0
- Outcome
- IPCA1e0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Value
- 0.19e0
- Qualifier
- 1.23e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tvr83 and Tvr28 with the least IPCA1 (0.19 and 0.09) and ASV (1.23 and 1.18, respectively) scores”
t0“Vigna radiata”
Claim · model-written summary
Tvr28 had low instability scores, IPCA1 0.09 and ASV 1.18.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Material
- Tvr28e0
- Outcome
- IPCA1e0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Value
- 0.09e0
- Qualifier
- 1.18e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tvr83 and Tvr28 with the least IPCA1 (0.19 and 0.09) and ASV (1.23 and 1.18, respectively) scores”
t0“Vigna radiata”
Claim · model-written summary
Tvr83 was judged more stable and among the best for seed yield across agrivoltaic microenvironments.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Material
- Tvr83e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- beste0
- Qualifier
- more stable across the APV microenvironmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tvr83 and Tvr28 were more stable across the APV microenvironments and were the best in seed yield”
t0“Vigna radiata”
Claim · model-written summary
Tvr28 was judged more stable and among the best for seed yield across agrivoltaic microenvironments.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
- Material
- Tvr28e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- beste0
- Qualifier
- more stable across the APV microenvironmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tvr83 and Tvr28 were more stable across the APV microenvironments and were the best in seed yield”
t0“Vigna radiata”
The same questions in other papers
climate site · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.