Paper · 2006 · Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA AND RHIZOCTONIA SOLANI ON SOYBEAN BY FORMULATION OF BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS AND TRICHODERMA HARZIANUM

M.E Mahdy; E.Z Khalifa; Rania Z. El-Shennawy

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Preparationof either Bacillus thuringiensis or Trichoderma harzianum were used as seed coating or soil application for management of root-knot and root rot disease complex caused by the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne javanica and the fungus Rhizoctonia solani on soybean plants. Number of galls, root galling, egg masses and disease severity were reduced sharply on plants treated with both biocontrol agents, either as seed or soil application compared with non-treated plants. Soil application with both biocontrol agents was the best method in reducing nematode and fungus disease severity. Plant growth parameters i.e. fresh shoot and root weight, dry weight and number of pods and bacterial nodules were markedly increased with all treatments of biocontrol agent either with seed or soil treatment compared to plants grown in infested soil with either pathogens alone or combined. Results show that plant survival was more affected when R. solani was alone or combined with M. javanica. Seed coating was considered the effective method in increasing survival plants. The biochemical analysis of treated plants with both biocontrol agents were affected compared to non-treated plants grown in pathogen infested soil. The biochemical parameters i.e. chlorophyll A and B, carotein, phenols and amino acids were enhanced in bioagent treated plants compared to non-treated plants

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocontrol treatments sharply reduced galling, egg masses, and disease severity relative to untreated soybean.

Taxon
SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
Treatment
both biocontrol agentse0
Outcome
Number of galls, root galling, egg massese0
Direction
reduced sharplye0
Comparator
non-treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of galls, root galling, egg masses and disease severity were reduced sharply on plants treated with both biocontrol agents, either as seed or soil application compared with non-treated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–479 · show in text ↑
t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of both agents best reduced nematode and fungal disease severity.

Taxon
SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Soil application with both biocontrol agentse0
Outcome
nematode and fungus disease severitye0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application with both biocontrol agents was the best method in reducing nematode and fungus disease severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–594 · show in text ↑
t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocontrol treatment increased shoot and root weight, pod number, and nodules relative to infested untreated plants.

Taxon
SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
Treatment
all treatments of biocontrol agente0
Outcome
fresh shoot and root weight, dry weight and number of podse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
plants grown in infested soil with either pathogens alone or combinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth parameters i.e. fresh shoot and root weight, dry weight and number of pods and bacterial nodules were markedly increased with all treatments of biocontrol agent either with seed or soil treatment compared to plants grown in infested soil with either pathogens alone or combined.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed coating was effective at increasing soybean survival.

Taxon
SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Seed coatinge0
Outcome
survival plantse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed coating was considered the effective method in increasing survival plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocontrol treatments enhanced chlorophyll, carotene, phenols, and amino acids in soybean.

Taxon
SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
Treatment
bioagente0
Outcome
chlorophyll A and B, carotein, phenolse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
non-treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll A and B, carotein, phenols and amino acids were enhanced in bioagent treated plants compared to non-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1380 · show in text ↑
t0

“SOYBEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑

application · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 46 positive, 8 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Adding the inhibitor increased soybean leaf-tip necrosis.

    Phytotoxicity of foliar-applied urea · 1989 · compared with leaves fertilized with urea

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

seed treatment · survival · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biocontrol · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

biocontrol · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.