Paper · 2015 · Journal of Horticulture

Post-Harvest Life of Cut Chrysanthemum Cultivars in Relation to Chemicals, Wrapping Material and Storage Conditions

Ranjan Srivastava Gunjan Sharma

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study was conducted to examine the efficacy of chemicals, wrapping material and storage conditions on postharvest life of chrysanthemum cultivars Snowball Yellow and Snowball White. Vase life and flower quality were significantly influenced by chemicals, wrapping material and storage conditions. Minimum weight loss of spikes, maximum total water absorbed, flower diameter and vase life were obtained in treatment T2 (4% sucrose) as compared to control (Tap water). Significant effect of wrapping material and storage condition were also observed on per cent weight loss, total water absorbed maximum flower diameter and vase life in both the cultivars. Wrapping of spikes in PP 200 gauge with refrigerated storage at 3-4°C for 3 days + 6 hours of simulated transit (T₃Sâ‚‚) resulted in minimum percent weight loss, maximum total water absorbed, flower diameter and maximum vase life in both the cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemicals, wrapping and storage significantly influenced vase life and flower quality.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
chemicals, wrapping material and storage conditionse0
Outcome
Vase life and flower qualitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vase life and flower quality were significantly influenced by chemicals, wrapping material and storage conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 with 4% sucrose minimized spike weight loss relative to tap water.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
T2 (4% sucrose)e0
Outcome
weight loss of spikese0
Direction
Minimume0
Comparator
Tap watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum weight loss of spikes, maximum total water absorbed, flower diameter and vase life were obtained in treatment T2 (4% sucrose) as compared to control (Tap water).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 with 4% sucrose maximized water absorption relative to tap water.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
T2 (4% sucrose)e0
Outcome
total water absorbede0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
Tap watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum weight loss of spikes, maximum total water absorbed, flower diameter and vase life were obtained in treatment T2 (4% sucrose) as compared to control (Tap water).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 with 4% sucrose maximized flower diameter relative to tap water.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
T2 (4% sucrose)e0
Outcome
flower diametere0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
Tap watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum weight loss of spikes, maximum total water absorbed, flower diameter and vase life were obtained in treatment T2 (4% sucrose) as compared to control (Tap water).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 with 4% sucrose maximized vase life relative to tap water.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
T2 (4% sucrose)e0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
Tap watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum weight loss of spikes, maximum total water absorbed, flower diameter and vase life were obtained in treatment T2 (4% sucrose) as compared to control (Tap water).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PP 200 gauge wrapping with refrigerated storage minimized spike weight loss in both cultivars.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
Wrapping of spikes in PP 200 gauge with refrigerated storage at 3-4°C for 3 days + 6 hours of simulated transite0
Outcome
percent weight losse0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wrapping of spikes in PP 200 gauge with refrigerated storage at 3-4°C for 3 days + 6 hours of simulated transit (T₃Sâ‚‚) resulted in minimum percent weight loss, maximum total water absorbed, flower diameter and maximum vase life in both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wrapping and refrigeration combination maximized water absorption in both cultivars.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
Wrapping of spikes in PP 200 gauge with refrigerated storage at 3-4°C for 3 days + 6 hours of simulated transite0
Outcome
total water absorbede0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wrapping of spikes in PP 200 gauge with refrigerated storage at 3-4°C for 3 days + 6 hours of simulated transit (T₃Sâ‚‚) resulted in minimum percent weight loss, maximum total water absorbed, flower diameter and maximum vase life in both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wrapping and refrigeration combination maximized flower diameter in both cultivars.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
Wrapping of spikes in PP 200 gauge with refrigerated storage at 3-4°C for 3 days + 6 hours of simulated transite0
Outcome
flower diametere0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wrapping of spikes in PP 200 gauge with refrigerated storage at 3-4°C for 3 days + 6 hours of simulated transit (T₃Sâ‚‚) resulted in minimum percent weight loss, maximum total water absorbed, flower diameter and maximum vase life in both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wrapping and refrigeration combination maximized vase life in both cultivars.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
Wrapping of spikes in PP 200 gauge with refrigerated storage at 3-4°C for 3 days + 6 hours of simulated transite0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wrapping of spikes in PP 200 gauge with refrigerated storage at 3-4°C for 3 days + 6 hours of simulated transit (T₃Sâ‚‚) resulted in minimum percent weight loss, maximum total water absorbed, flower diameter and maximum vase life in both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chrysanthemum Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–48 · show in text ↑

sucrose · growth · ChrysanthemumResults agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

sucrose · quality: postharvest · ChrysanthemumResults agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

storage · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.