Paper · 2015 · Tropical Agricultural Research

Postharvest life of cut chrysanthemum cultivars in relation to chemicals, wrapping material and storage conditions

Gunjan Sharma; Ranjan Srivastava

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A study was conducted to examine the efficacy of chemicals, wrapping material and storage conditions on postharvest life of chrysanthemum cultivars Snowball Yellow and Snowball White. Vase life and flower quality were significantly influenced by chemicals, wrapping material and storage conditions. Minimum weight loss of spikes, maximum total water absorbed, flower diameter and vase life were obtained in treatment T2 (4% sucrose) as compared to control (Tap water). Significant effect of wrapping material and storage condition were also observed on per cent weight loss, total water absorbed maximum flower diameter and vase life in both the cultivars. Wrapping of spikes in PP 200 gauge with refrigerated storage at 3-4 °C for 3 days + 6 hours of simulated transit (T₃S₂) resulted in minimum percent weight loss, maximum total water absorbed, flower diameter and maximum vase life in both the cultivars. Tropical Agricultural Research Vol. 26 (1): 195 – 201 (2014)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four percent sucrose minimized spike weight loss and maximized water absorption, flower diameter and vase life relative to tap water.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
4% sucrosee0
Outcome
weight loss of spikes, maximum total water absorbed, flower diameter and vase lifee0
Direction
Minimume0
Comparator
Tap watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum weight loss of spikes, maximum total water absorbed, flower diameter and vase life were obtained in treatment T2 (4% sucrose) as compared to control (Tap water).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polypropylene wrapping with refrigerated storage and simulated transit minimized weight loss and maximized water absorption, flower diameter and vase life in both cultivars.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
PP 200 gauge with refrigerated storage at 3-4 °C for 3 days + 6 hours of simulated transite0
Outcome
percent weight loss, maximum total water absorbed, flower diameter and maximum vase lifee0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wrapping of spikes in PP 200 gauge with refrigerated storage at 3-4 °C for 3 days + 6 hours of simulated transit (T₃S₂) resulted in minimum percent weight loss, maximum total water absorbed, flower diameter and maximum vase life in both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemum cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–47 · show in text ↑

sucrose · quality: postharvest · ChrysanthemumResults agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.