Paper · 2011 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Efficacy of different herbicides on growth and yield of direct wet seeded rice sown through drum seeder

Dileep Kachroo; B. R. Bazaya

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An investigation was conducted at Chatha Farm of Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu during kharif seasons of 2006 and 2007 on the efficacy of different herbicides on growth and yield of direct wet seeded rice (DWSR) sown through drum seeder. Fourteen weed control treatments were tested in randomized block design replicated thrice. All the weed control treatments significantly reduced the population and dry weight of weeds which resulted in significantly higher growth and yield of rice over weedy check. Though the weed free treatment yielded significantly higher than other treatments, but it was not economical (1.55 B: C ratio). Among the herbicides pretilachlor @ 0.5 kg/ha at 6 DAS fb rotary hoe at 20 DAS not only significantly reduced population and dry weight of weeds but also increased the grain yield of rice with the concomitant increase in the yield attributes and also resulted in highest net returns (Rs. 25918/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.25).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed-control treatments significantly reduced weed population and dry weight versus the weedy check.

Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
population and dry weight of weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the weed control treatments significantly reduced the population and dry weight of weeds which resulted in significantly higher growth and yield of rice over weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed-control treatments significantly increased rice growth and yield versus the weedy check.

Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
growth and yield of ricee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the weed control treatments significantly reduced the population and dry weight of weeds which resulted in significantly higher growth and yield of rice over weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed-free treatment yielded significantly more than the others.

Treatment
weed free treatmente0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the weed free treatment yielded significantly higher than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed-free treatment was uneconomical at a 1.55 benefit to cost ratio.

Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Value
1.55e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was not economical (1.55 B: C ratio)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor plus rotary hoe significantly reduced weed population and dry weight.

Treatment
pretilachlor @ 0.5 kg/ha at 6 DAS fb rotary hoe at 20 DASe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
population and dry weight of weedse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pretilachlor @ 0.5 kg/ha at 6 DAS fb rotary hoe at 20 DAS not only significantly reduced population and dry weight of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor plus rotary hoe increased rice grain yield and yield attributes.

Treatment
pretilachlor @ 0.5 kg/ha at 6 DAS fb rotary hoe at 20 DASe0
Outcome
grain yield of ricee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pretilachlor @ 0.5 kg/ha at 6 DAS fb rotary hoe at 20 DAS not only significantly reduced population and dry weight of weeds but also increased the grain yield of rice with the concomitant increase in the yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–917 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor plus rotary hoe had the highest net returns of Rs. 25918/ha.

Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 25918/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulted in highest net returns (Rs. 25918/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor plus rotary hoe had a benefit to cost ratio of 2.25.

Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Value
2.25e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefit: cost ratio (2.25)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–78 · show in text ↑

Pretilachlor · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

141 papers: 133 positive, 8 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Pretilachlor · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

150 papers: 147 positive, 3 negative or no effect

146 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.