Paper · 2013 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Effect of nitrogen and weed control on productivity of wheat

R. R. Upasani; R. Thakur; A.N. Puran; et al.

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2005–06 and 2006–07 to evaluate the effect of nitrogen levels and weed control on weed growth, productivity and economics of wheat. The treatments comprised of 4 levels of nitrogen, viz. 0, 40, 80, and 120 kg/ha in main plots and 5 weed control methods, viz. weedy control, 2,4-D Na 0.75 kg/ha as post-emergence, isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha as post-emergence, isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha + 2,4-D Na 0.75 kg/ha as post-emergence and weeding by Dutch hoe at 15, 30 and 45 days after sowing. Maximum density and dry weight were recorded with 120 kg N/ha and minimum under N0. Increasing levels of nitrogen from 0 to 40, 40 to 80 and 80 to 120 kg/ha increased weed density by 33.7, 39.9 and 47.3% and weed dry matter by 35.2, 24.9 and 13.5%, respectively while N up take by 68.8, 56.7 and 18.7% phosphorus 13.2, 4.6 and 4.4% and potassium 16.2, 7.0 and 8.7% over preceding lower levels. 120 kg N/ha recorded significantly higher grain (2.90 t/ha) and straw (4.6 t/ha) yield, net return ( 26,616/ha) and B:C ratio (1.52).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed density was greatest at 120 kg N/ha and least with N0.

Treatment
120 kg N/hae0
Interactor
weede1weede0
Outcome
Maximum densitye0
Direction
Maximume0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum density and dry weight were recorded with 120 kg N/ha and minimum under N0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–616 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–150 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed dry weight was greatest at 120 kg N/ha and least with N0.

Treatment
120 kg N/hae0
Interactor
weede1weede0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
Maximume0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum density and dry weight were recorded with 120 kg N/ha and minimum under N0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–616 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–150 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Successive nitrogen increases raised weed density by 33.7%, 39.9%, and 47.3%.

Treatment
Increasing levels of nitrogen from 0 to 40, 40 to 80 and 80 to 120 kg/hae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
33.7, 39.9 and 47.3%e0
Comparator
preceding lower levelse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing levels of nitrogen from 0 to 40, 40 to 80 and 80 to 120 kg/ha increased weed density by 33.7, 39.9 and 47.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“over preceding lower levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Successive nitrogen increases raised weed dry matter by 35.2%, 24.9%, and 13.5%.

Treatment
Increasing levels of nitrogene1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry mattere0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
35.2, 24.9 and 13.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed dry matter by 35.2, 24.9 and 13.5%, respectively while N up take”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–811 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing levels of nitrogen from 0 to 40, 40 to 80 and 80 to 120 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake rose by 68.8%, 56.7%, and 18.7% across successive nitrogen increments.

Outcome
N up takee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
68.8, 56.7 and 18.7%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N up take by 68.8, 56.7 and 18.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus uptake rose by 13.2%, 4.6%, and 4.4%.

Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
13.2, 4.6 and 4.4%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phosphorus 13.2, 4.6 and 4.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium uptake rose by 16.2%, 7.0%, and 8.7%.

Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
16.2, 7.0 and 8.7%e0
Comparator
preceding lower levelse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potassium 16.2, 7.0 and 8.7% over preceding lower levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 120 kg N/ha treatment gave significantly higher grain yield of 2.90 t/ha.

Treatment
120 kg N/hae0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.90 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“120 kg N/ha recorded significantly higher grain (2.90 t/ha) and straw (4.6 t/ha) yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 120 kg N/ha treatment gave significantly higher straw yield of 4.6 t/ha.

Treatment
120 kg N/hae0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.6 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“120 kg N/ha recorded significantly higher grain (2.90 t/ha) and straw (4.6 t/ha) yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 120 kg N/ha treatment gave a significantly higher net return of 26,616/ha.

Treatment
120 kg N/hae0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
26,616/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“120 kg N/ha recorded significantly higher grain (2.90 t/ha) and straw (4.6 t/ha) yield, net return ( 26,616/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 120 kg N/ha treatment gave a significantly higher benefit to cost ratio of 1.52.

Treatment
120 kg N/hae0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.52e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“120 kg N/ha recorded significantly higher grain (2.90 t/ha) and straw (4.6 t/ha) yield, net return ( 26,616/ha) and B:C ratio (1.52)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 27 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 426 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.