Paper · 1997 · Weed Research

Effects of nitrogen supply on competition between wheat and three annual weed species

J. IQBAL; D. WRIGHT

9
claims
10
verbatim quotes
70
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary Three pot experiments have investigated the effects of nitrogen (N) supply on interspecific competition between three weed species ( Phalaris minor Retz., Chenopodium album L, and Sinapis arvensis L.) and spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cv, Alexandria. The treatments tested included monocultures of each species and a mix‐ture containing them in equal proportions that were combined factorially with two levels of N supply (20, 120 kg N ha ‐1 ). Low N supply decreased net photosynthetic rate (P n ), leaf N percentage, plant dry weight and N uptake of both wheat and weed species and gram dry weight of wheat. The effects of low N on P n and dry weight of weeds were greater than the effects on wheat. In most cases the decrease in P n at low N was due to non‐stomatal factors. The relative competitive abilities of wheat and weeds were influenced by N supply. At high N, S.arvensis was more competitive than wheat, whereas P. minor was less competitive than wheat. C. album was more competitive than wheat at both N levels. The rank order of competitive ability of the weed species was C. album > P. minor > S. arvensis . The effects of interspecific competition on P n were smaller than the effects of N supply and were not associated with corresponding effects on leaf N percentage and plant dry weight of both wheat and weed species and grain dry weight of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N supply decreased net photosynthetic rate, leaf N percentage and plant dry weight of wheat and weeds.

Treatment
Low N supplye1
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (P n), leaf N percentage, plant dry weighte1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Low N supply decreased net photosynthetic rate (P n), leaf N percentage, plant dry weight and N uptake of both wheat and weed species and gram dry weight of wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 460–623 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N supply decreased N uptake of wheat and weeds and gram dry weight of wheat.

Treatment
Low N supplye1
Outcome
N uptake of both wheat and weed species and gram dry weight of wheate1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Low N supply decreased net photosynthetic rate (P n), leaf N percentage, plant dry weight and N uptake of both wheat and weed species and gram dry weight of wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 460–623 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effects of low N on P n and dry weight of weeds were greater than the effects on wheat.

Treatment
low Ne2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
P n and dry weight of weedse2
Direction
greatere2
Comparator
wheate2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The effects of low N on P n and dry weight of weeds were greater than the effects on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–715 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high N, S. arvensis was more competitive than wheat.

Treatment
high Ne3
Interactor
S.arvensisMutarda arvensise3weed
Outcome
competitivee3
Direction
moree3
Comparator
wheate3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mutarda arvensis
Mutarda arvensis · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. TeunSpaans assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“At high N, S.arvensis was more competitive than wheat, whereas P. minor was less competitive than wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high N, P. minor was less competitive than wheat.

Treatment
high Ne3
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore3weed
Outcome
competitivee3
Direction
lesse3
Comparator
wheate3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“At high N, S.arvensis was more competitive than wheat, whereas P. minor was less competitive than wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. album was more competitive than wheat at both N levels.

Treatment
both N levelse4
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume4weed
Outcome
competitivee4
Direction
moree4
Comparator
wheate4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“C. album was more competitive than wheat at both N levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1038 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rank order of competitive ability of the weed species was C. album > P. minor > S. arvensis.

Interactor
weed speciese6weed
Outcome
rank order of competitive ability of the weed speciese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The rank order of competitive ability of the weed species was C. album > P. minor > S. arvensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“competition between wheat and three annual weed species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effects of interspecific competition on P n were smaller than the effects of N supply.

Treatment
interspecific competitione7
Outcome
P ne7
Direction
smallere7
Comparator
N supplye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The effects of interspecific competition on P n were smaller than the effects of N supply and were not associated with corresponding effects on leaf N percentage and plant dry weight of both wheat and weed species and grain dry weight of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1381 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interspecific competition effects on P n were not associated with corresponding effects on leaf N percentage, plant dry weight and grain dry weight of wheat.

Treatment
interspecific competitione7
Outcome
leaf N percentage and plant dry weight of both wheat and weed species and grain dry weight of wheate7
Direction
not associated with corresponding effectse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The effects of interspecific competition on P n were smaller than the effects of N supply and were not associated with corresponding effects on leaf N percentage and plant dry weight of both wheat and weed species and grain dry weight of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1381 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 27 positive, 14 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 98 positive, 22 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

nitrogen · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.