Paper · 2003 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Water use efficiency of cotton as influenced by agro-environment

D.K. Mandal; N.C. Khandare; C. Mandal̀; et al.

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The water use (WU) and the water use efficiency (WUE) of crop under rainfed agriculture depends on the crop agro-environment in which it is grown. The present paper deals with the variation of WU and the WUE of rain-fed cotton in a black soil catena of central India in varying rainfall conditions. The studies reveal that both the WU and WUE vary with rainfall aberration. The average WU of cotton (var. H-4) varied from 327.3 to 401 mm and WUE from 3.30 to 4.34 kg ha−1 mm−1 in the soil catena. The lowest WU value was obtained for Lithic Haplustepts (P1) occurring on piedmont plain and the highest was observed for Vertic Haplustepts (P3) occurring on lower plain. The average WUE also followed the similar trend and showed a value of 3.30, 4.30, 4.88 and 4.34 kg ha−1 mm−1 for pedons P1, P2, P3 and P4, respectively. However, in the excessive rainfall year, on an average WUE decreased by 6.8 to 44.5 per cent over a normal year while the same, in the drought year, in general, increased by 1.5 to 10.6 per cent. The overall coefficient of WUE varied from 0.62 to 1.44 per cent. Over the years the lowest coefficient of variation of WUE was observed for P3 soil suggesting the most sustainability of Vertic Haplustepts (P3) for rainfed cotton production under varying rainfall situations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average water use of cotton varied from 327.3 to 401 mm across the soil catena.

Material
H-4e1
Outcome
WUe1
Value
327.3 to 401 mme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average WU of cotton (var. H-4) varied from 327.3 to 401 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–437 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency of cotton varied from 3.30 to 4.34 kg ha-1 mm-1 across the soil catena.

Outcome
WUEe2
Value
3.30 to 4.34 kg ha−1 mm−1e2
Setting
soil catenae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average WU of cotton (var. H-4) varied from 327.3 to 401 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–437 · show in text ↑
e2

“WUE from 3.30 to 4.34 kg ha−1 mm−1 in the soil catena”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–495 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use was lowest on Lithic Haplustepts (P1) on piedmont plain.

Outcome
WU valuee3
Direction
loweste3
Setting
Lithic Haplustepts (P1) occurring on piedmont plaine3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average WU of cotton (var. H-4) varied from 327.3 to 401 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“The lowest WU value was obtained for Lithic Haplustepts (P1) occurring on piedmont plain and the highest was observed for Vertic Haplustepts (P3) occurring on lower plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–667 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use was highest on Vertic Haplustepts (P3) on lower plain.

Outcome
WU valuee3
Direction
higheste3
Setting
Vertic Haplustepts (P3) occurring on lower plaine3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average WU of cotton (var. H-4) varied from 327.3 to 401 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“The lowest WU value was obtained for Lithic Haplustepts (P1) occurring on piedmont plain and the highest was observed for Vertic Haplustepts (P3) occurring on lower plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–667 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average water use efficiency on pedon P1 was 3.30 kg ha-1 mm-1.

Outcome
WUEe4
Value
3.30e4
Setting
P1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average WU of cotton (var. H-4) varied from 327.3 to 401 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–437 · show in text ↑
e4

“The average WUE also followed the similar trend and showed a value of 3.30, 4.30, 4.88 and 4.34 kg ha−1 mm−1 for pedons P1, P2, P3 and P4, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–820 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average water use efficiency on pedon P2 was 4.30 kg ha-1 mm-1.

Outcome
WUEe4
Value
4.30e4
Setting
P2e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average WU of cotton (var. H-4) varied from 327.3 to 401 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–437 · show in text ↑
e4

“The average WUE also followed the similar trend and showed a value of 3.30, 4.30, 4.88 and 4.34 kg ha−1 mm−1 for pedons P1, P2, P3 and P4, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–820 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average water use efficiency on pedon P3 was 4.88 kg ha-1 mm-1.

Outcome
WUEe4
Value
4.88e4
Setting
P3e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average WU of cotton (var. H-4) varied from 327.3 to 401 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–437 · show in text ↑
e4

“The average WUE also followed the similar trend and showed a value of 3.30, 4.30, 4.88 and 4.34 kg ha−1 mm−1 for pedons P1, P2, P3 and P4, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–820 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average water use efficiency on pedon P4 was 4.34 kg ha-1 mm-1.

Outcome
WUEe4
Value
4.34e4
Setting
P4e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average WU of cotton (var. H-4) varied from 327.3 to 401 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–437 · show in text ↑
e4

“The average WUE also followed the similar trend and showed a value of 3.30, 4.30, 4.88 and 4.34 kg ha−1 mm−1 for pedons P1, P2, P3 and P4, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the excessive rainfall year, WUE decreased by 6.8 to 44.5 per cent relative to a normal year.

Treatment
excessive rainfall yeare5
Outcome
WUEe5
Direction
decreasede5
Value
6.8 to 44.5 per cente5
Comparator
normal yeare5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average WU of cotton (var. H-4) varied from 327.3 to 401 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–437 · show in text ↑
e5

“in the excessive rainfall year, on an average WUE decreased by 6.8 to 44.5 per cent over a normal year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the drought year, WUE increased by 1.5 to 10.6 per cent relative to a normal year.

Treatment
drought yeare7
Outcome
WUEe7
Direction
increasede7
Value
1.5 to 10.6 per cente7
Comparator
normal yeare7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average WU of cotton (var. H-4) varied from 327.3 to 401 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–437 · show in text ↑
e7

“in the excessive rainfall year, on an average WUE decreased by 6.8 to 44.5 per cent over a normal year while the same, in the drought year, in general, increased by 1.5 to 10.6 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1016 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The overall coefficient of WUE varied from 0.62 to 1.44 per cent.

Outcome
coefficient of WUEe2
Value
0.62 to 1.44 per cente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average WU of cotton (var. H-4) varied from 327.3 to 401 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–437 · show in text ↑
e2

“The overall coefficient of WUE varied from 0.62 to 1.44 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1082 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest coefficient of variation of WUE was observed on the P3 soil.

Outcome
coefficient of variation of WUEe2
Direction
loweste2
Setting
P3 soile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average WU of cotton (var. H-4) varied from 327.3 to 401 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–437 · show in text ↑
e2

“Over the years the lowest coefficient of variation of WUE was observed for P3 soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1166 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Vertic Haplustepts (P3) is recommended for sustainable rain-fed cotton production under varying rainfall.

Outcome
sustainabilitye2
Qualifier
under varying rainfall situationse2
Setting
Vertic Haplustepts (P3)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average WU of cotton (var. H-4) varied from 327.3 to 401 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–437 · show in text ↑
e2

“suggesting the most sustainability of Vertic Haplustepts (P3) for rainfed cotton production under varying rainfall situations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1292 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both water use and water use efficiency vary with rainfall aberration.

Treatment
rainfall aberratione2
Outcome
WU and WUEe2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The average WU of cotton (var. H-4) varied from 327.3 to 401 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–437 · show in text ↑
e2

“The studies reveal that both the WU and WUE vary with rainfall aberration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–372 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

36 papers: 14 positive, 22 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

rainfall · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.