Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Soil moisture content as influenced by varied levels of irrigation and nitrogen in Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) grown in alfisols of Southern Telangana

S. G. Mahadevappa; G. Sreenivas; D. Raji Reddy; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during kharif 2014 and 2015 at Agricultural Research Institute, Rajendranagar to assess the influence of irrigation schedule and nitrogen level for Bt cotton in alfisols in Southern Telangana. Irrigation scheduled at 0.8 IW/CPE (I1) recorded higher soil moisture content in 0-30 cm depth before and after irrigation. Rainfed (I3) cotton registered higher mean water use efficiency of 3.05 kg ha-1 mm-1 followed by irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE (I2) and 0.8 IW/CPE (I1) which registered 3.00 kg ha-1mm-1 and 2.74 kg ha-1 mm-1, respectively. Higher soil moisture content before and after irrigation throughout the crop growing period in 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm soil depth and higher water use efficiency (2.88 and 3.90 kg ha-1mm-1) was recorded with N4 (225 kg ha-1) over lower levels of nitrogen application. From the experiment, considering the net returns and B:C ratio it can be concluded that, higher seed cotton yield can be obtained with the irrigation scheduled at 0.4 IW/CPE and application of nitrogen at 150 kg ha-1 in Bt cotton in alfisols.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE gave higher soil moisture content in the 0-30 cm depth before and after irrigation.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
Irrigation scheduled at 0.8 IW/CPE (I1)e1
Outcome
soil moisture contente1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Irrigation scheduled at 0.8 IW/CPE (I1) recorded higher soil moisture content in 0-30 cm depth before and after irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–348 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed cotton had higher mean water use efficiency, 3.05 kg ha-1 mm-1.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
Rainfed (I3)e2
Outcome
mean water use efficiencye2
Direction
highere2
Value
3.05 kg ha-1 mm-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“Rainfed (I3) cotton registered higher mean water use efficiency of 3.05 kg ha-1 mm-1 followed by irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE (I2) and 0.8 IW/CPE (I1) which registered 3.00 kg ha-1mm-1 and 2.74 kg ha-1 mm-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–566 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE gave lower water use efficiency than rainfed cotton, 3.00 kg ha-1mm-1.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE (I2)e2
Outcome
mean water use efficiencye2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
3.00 kg ha-1mm-1e2
Comparator
Rainfed (I3)e2

Verbatim

e2

“Rainfed (I3) cotton registered higher mean water use efficiency of 3.05 kg ha-1 mm-1 followed by irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE (I2) and 0.8 IW/CPE (I1) which registered 3.00 kg ha-1mm-1 and 2.74 kg ha-1 mm-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–566 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE gave lower water use efficiency than rainfed cotton, 2.74 kg ha-1 mm-1.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
0.8 IW/CPE (I1)e2
Outcome
mean water use efficiencye2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
2.74 kg ha-1 mm-1e2
Comparator
Rainfed (I3)e2

Verbatim

e2

“Rainfed (I3) cotton registered higher mean water use efficiency of 3.05 kg ha-1 mm-1 followed by irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE (I2) and 0.8 IW/CPE (I1) which registered 3.00 kg ha-1mm-1 and 2.74 kg ha-1 mm-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–566 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 225 kg ha-1 gave higher soil moisture content before and after irrigation in 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm depths.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
N4 (225 kg ha-1)e3
Outcome
soil moisture contente3
Direction
Highere3
Comparator
lower levels of nitrogen applicatione3

Verbatim

e3

“Higher soil moisture content before and after irrigation throughout the crop growing period in 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm soil depth and higher water use efficiency (2.88 and 3.90 kg ha-1mm-1) was recorded with N4 (225 kg ha-1) over lower levels of nitrogen application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 225 kg ha-1 gave higher water use efficiency, 2.88 and 3.90 kg ha-1mm-1, than lower nitrogen levels.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
N4 (225 kg ha-1)e3
Outcome
water use efficiencye3
Direction
highere3
Value
2.88 and 3.90 kg ha-1mm-1e3
Comparator
lower levels of nitrogen applicatione3

Verbatim

e3

“Higher soil moisture content before and after irrigation throughout the crop growing period in 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm soil depth and higher water use efficiency (2.88 and 3.90 kg ha-1mm-1) was recorded with N4 (225 kg ha-1) over lower levels of nitrogen application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–116 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE with 150 kg ha-1 nitrogen for higher seed cotton yield in Bt cotton on alfisols.

Taxon
Bt cottone5
Treatment
irrigation scheduled at 0.4 IW/CPEe5
Outcome
seed cotton yielde5

Verbatim

e5

“higher seed cotton yield can be obtained with the irrigation scheduled at 0.4 IW/CPE and application of nitrogen at 150 kg ha-1 in Bt cotton in alfisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–116 · show in text ↑

rainfall · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 110 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 110 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 73 positive, 61 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.