Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of tillage, rice residue and nitrogen-management practice on yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and chemical properties of soil under rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat system

SAMDEEP KUMAR; D.S. PAMDEY; M.S. RAMA

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

For analyzing the effect of tillage, rice (Oryza sativa L.) residue and nitrogen management on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Firoi & Paol.) productivity and soil chemical properties, a field trial was conducted during rainy and winter seasons of 1999-2000 and 2000-2001, consisting of 7 tillage types with residue-management options in main plots and 3 nitrogen-management schedules in subplots, replicated 4 times in split-plot design. Incorporation, retention at soil surface and burning of rice residues in succeeding wheat field remarkably en- hanced the grain yield over residue removal. Deep incorporation of rice residue improved the growth and yield attributes, which led to higher grain yield over others. Conservation tillage produced dwarf plants and smaller grains. Management of residue either by deep tillage or by conservation tillage yielded broader flag leaves. The fertility status of soil after wheat harvest in terms of organic carbon, available N, P and K got enriched by the in- corporation or retention of residue, irrespective of tillage types, being the highest under conservation tillage. Residue burning and removal did not show any variation in organic carbon and available N content of surface soil, but in case of available P and K, residue burning substantiated its superiority to residue removal. The effect of starter dose of 20 kg Nlha could be nullified by applying 75% of total recommended dose of nitrogen to wheat crop at sowing and rest at crown root initiation stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporation, retention or burning of rice residues enhanced wheat grain yield over residue removal.

Treatment
Incorporation, retention at soil surface and burning of rice residuese1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
en- hancede1
Comparator
residue removale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“analyzing the effect of tillage, rice (Oryza sativa L.) residue and nitrogen management on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Firoi & Paol.) productivity and soil chemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–186 · show in text ↑
e1

“Incorporation, retention at soil surface and burning of rice residues in succeeding wheat field remarkably en- hanced the grain yield over residue removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep incorporation of rice residue improved wheat growth and yield attributes compared with other treatments.

Treatment
Deep incorporation of rice residuee2
Outcome
growth and yield attributese2
Direction
improvede2
Comparator
otherse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“analyzing the effect of tillage, rice (Oryza sativa L.) residue and nitrogen management on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Firoi & Paol.) productivity and soil chemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–186 · show in text ↑
e2

“Deep incorporation of rice residue improved the growth and yield attributes, which led to higher grain yield over others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep incorporation of rice residue gave higher wheat grain yield than other treatments.

Treatment
Deep incorporation of rice residuee2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
otherse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“analyzing the effect of tillage, rice (Oryza sativa L.) residue and nitrogen management on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Firoi & Paol.) productivity and soil chemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–186 · show in text ↑
e2

“Deep incorporation of rice residue improved the growth and yield attributes, which led to higher grain yield over others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage produced dwarf wheat plants.

Treatment
Conservation tillagee3
Outcome
plantse3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Qualifier
dwarfe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“analyzing the effect of tillage, rice (Oryza sativa L.) residue and nitrogen management on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Firoi & Paol.) productivity and soil chemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–186 · show in text ↑
e3

“Conservation tillage produced dwarf plants and smaller grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage produced smaller wheat grains.

Treatment
Conservation tillagee3
Outcome
grainse3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Qualifier
smallere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“analyzing the effect of tillage, rice (Oryza sativa L.) residue and nitrogen management on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Firoi & Paol.) productivity and soil chemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–186 · show in text ↑
e3

“Conservation tillage produced dwarf plants and smaller grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue management by deep tillage or conservation tillage gave broader wheat flag leaves.

Treatment
Management of residue either by deep tillage or by conservation tillagee4
Outcome
flag leavese4
Direction
broadere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“analyzing the effect of tillage, rice (Oryza sativa L.) residue and nitrogen management on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Firoi & Paol.) productivity and soil chemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–186 · show in text ↑
e4

“Management of residue either by deep tillage or by conservation tillage yielded broader flag leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporation or retention of residue enriched soil organic carbon after wheat harvest.

Treatment
in- corporation or retention of residuee5
Outcome
organic carbone5
Direction
enrichede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“analyzing the effect of tillage, rice (Oryza sativa L.) residue and nitrogen management on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Firoi & Paol.) productivity and soil chemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–186 · show in text ↑
e5

“The fertility status of soil after wheat harvest in terms of organic carbon, available N, P and K got enriched by the in- corporation or retention of residue, irrespective of tillage types, being the highest under conservation tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporation or retention of residue enriched soil available N, P and K after wheat harvest.

Treatment
in- corporation or retention of residuee5
Outcome
available N, P and Ke5
Direction
enrichede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“analyzing the effect of tillage, rice (Oryza sativa L.) residue and nitrogen management on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Firoi & Paol.) productivity and soil chemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–186 · show in text ↑
e5

“The fertility status of soil after wheat harvest in terms of organic carbon, available N, P and K got enriched by the in- corporation or retention of residue, irrespective of tillage types, being the highest under conservation tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil enrichment in organic carbon, available N, P and K was highest under conservation tillage.

Treatment
conservation tillagee5
Outcome
organic carbon, available N, P and Ke5
Direction
higheste5
Comparator
tillage typese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“analyzing the effect of tillage, rice (Oryza sativa L.) residue and nitrogen management on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Firoi & Paol.) productivity and soil chemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–186 · show in text ↑
e5

“The fertility status of soil after wheat harvest in terms of organic carbon, available N, P and K got enriched by the in- corporation or retention of residue, irrespective of tillage types, being the highest under conservation tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue burning and removal did not change organic carbon or available N of surface soil.

Treatment
Residue burninge6
Outcome
organic carbon and available N content of surface soile6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Comparator
removale6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“analyzing the effect of tillage, rice (Oryza sativa L.) residue and nitrogen management on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Firoi & Paol.) productivity and soil chemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–186 · show in text ↑
e6

“Residue burning and removal did not show any variation in organic carbon and available N content of surface soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue burning was superior to residue removal for soil available P and K.

Treatment
residue burninge7
Outcome
available P and Ke7
Direction
superioritye7
Comparator
residue removale7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“analyzing the effect of tillage, rice (Oryza sativa L.) residue and nitrogen management on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Firoi & Paol.) productivity and soil chemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–186 · show in text ↑
e7

“in case of available P and K, residue burning substantiated its superiority to residue removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 75% of the recommended nitrogen at sowing could nullify the effect of a 20 kg N/ha starter dose on wheat.

Treatment
applying 75% of total recommended dose of nitrogen to wheat crop at sowinge1
Outcome
effecte1
Direction
nullifiede1
Value
75%e1
Comparator
starter dose of 20 kg Nlhae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“analyzing the effect of tillage, rice (Oryza sativa L.) residue and nitrogen management on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Firoi & Paol.) productivity and soil chemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–186 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of starter dose of 20 kg Nlha could be nullified by applying 75% of total recommended dose of nitrogen to wheat crop at sowing and rest at crown root initiation stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1511 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

fire · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fire · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fire · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 119 positive, 26 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 208 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.