Abstract
An experiment conducted for two Rabi seasons at the Directorate of Wheat Research, karnal, revealed the effectiveness of chlorsulfuron, metsulfuron and 2,4-D against broadleaf weeds, Pre-emergence application of chlorsulfuron (2DAS) showed some suppressive effect on Phalaris minor. The season long weed infestation resulled in the grain yield reduction by more than 8 q-ha−1 compared to weed free check. P minor was found to be more competitive weed than broadleaf weeds. Isoproturon provided partial control of P. minor due to mixed population of resistant and susceptible biotypes.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorsulfuron was effective against broadleaf weeds.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- chlorsulfurone0
- Interactor
- broadleaf weedse0weed
- Outcome
- effectiveness of chlorsulfurone0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effectiveness of chlorsulfuron, metsulfuron and 2,4-D against broadleaf weeds”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Metsulfuron was effective against broadleaf weeds.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- metsulfurone0
- Interactor
- broadleaf weedse0weed
- Outcome
- effectiveness of chlorsulfuron, metsulfuron and 2,4-D against broadleaf weedse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effectiveness of chlorsulfuron, metsulfuron and 2,4-D against broadleaf weeds”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
2,4-D was effective against broadleaf weeds.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 2,4-De0
- Interactor
- broadleaf weedse0weed
- Outcome
- effectiveness of chlorsulfuron, metsulfuron and 2,4-D against broadleaf weedse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effectiveness of chlorsulfuron, metsulfuron and 2,4-D against broadleaf weeds”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-emergence chlorsulfuron partly suppressed Phalaris minor.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Pre-emergence application of chlorsulfuron (2DAS)e0
- Interactor
- Phalaris minor
.jpg?width=60)
Phalaris minore0weed - Outcome
- suppressive effect on Phalaris minore0
- Direction
- suppressivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Pre-emergence application of chlorsulfuron (2DAS) showed some suppressive effect on Phalaris minor”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Season-long infestation reduced grain yield by more than 8 q-ha−1.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- season long weed infestatione0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- more than 8 q-ha−1e0
- Comparator
- weed free checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The season long weed infestation resulled in the grain yield reduction by more than 8 q-ha−1 compared to weed free check”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
P minor was more competitive than broadleaf weeds.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Interactor
- P minorPhalaris minore0weed
- Outcome
- more competitive weede0
- Comparator
- broadleaf weedse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“P minor was found to be more competitive weed than broadleaf weeds”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Isoproturon partly controlled P. minor.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Isoproturone0
- Interactor
- P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
- Outcome
- control of P. minore0
- Direction
- partiale0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Isoproturon provided partial control of P. minor due to mixed population of resistant and susceptible biotypes”
t0“Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
chlorsulfuron · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
isoproturon · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
130 papers more in this group
See all 134 papers →herbicide · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →infection · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
79 papers more in this group
See all 83 papers →climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
150 papers more in this group
See all 154 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.