Paper · 2015 · International Journal of Plant Animal and Environmental Sciences

EFFECT OF INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF PIGEONPEA (CAJANUS CAJAN (L.) MILLSP.)

P. V. Rao; A. S. Reddy; Y. Koteswara Rao

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during kharif (rainy) season of 2013 at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Lam, Guntur, India in randomized block design with three replications to study the effect of integrated weed management practices on growth and yield of pigeonpea. The weed free treatment significantly decreased the weed density, dry weight of weeds and also increased in weed control efficiency compared with weedy check. Integration of one hand weeding/intercultivation at 50 DAS with pendimethalin @ 0.75 kg a.i./ha PE or imazathapyr @ 100 g a.i./ha POE or quizalofop ethyl @100 a.i./ha POE or pendimethalin@0.75 kg a.i./ha PE and imazathapyr @ 100 g a.i./ha POE proved effective in reducing total weed density and dry weights of weeds and also increased in weed control efficiency compared with weedy check. The maximum values of growth parameters, yield components and grain yield (2647 kg/ha) were recorded under weed free situation which was closely followed by IWM treatments viz., integration of pendimethalin @ 0.75 kg a.i./ha PE and imazathapyr @ 100 g a.i./ha POE or pendimethalin@ 0.75 kg a.i./ha PE or imazathapyr @ 100 g a.i./ha POE or quizalofop ethyl @ 100 g a.i./ha POE or pendimethalin @ 0.75 kg a.i./ha PE and quizalofop ethyl @ 100 g a.i./ha POE with one hand weeding/intercultivation at 50 DAS. Beneficial effect due to above treatments on growth characters resulted in enhanced grain yields of pigeonpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free management significantly decreased weed density and dry weight relative to a weedy check.

Taxon
PIGEONPEACajanus cajant0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weed density, dry weight of weedse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weed free treatment significantly decreased the weed density, dry weight of weeds and also increased in weed control efficiency compared with weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–437 · show in text ↑
t0

“PIGEONPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free management increased weed control efficiency relative to a weedy check.

Taxon
PIGEONPEACajanus cajant0
Treatment
weed free treatmente0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weed free treatment significantly decreased the weed density, dry weight of weeds and also increased in weed control efficiency compared with weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–437 · show in text ↑
t0

“PIGEONPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding at 50 DAS combined with the listed herbicide regimes reduced total weed density and weed dry weight versus a weedy check.

Taxon
PIGEONPEACajanus cajant0
Treatment
one hand weeding/intercultivation at 50 DASe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
total weed density and dry weights of weedse0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integration of one hand weeding/intercultivation at 50 DAS with pendimethalin @ 0.75 kg a.i./ha PE or imazathapyr @ 100 g a.i./ha POE or quizalofop ethyl @100 a.i./ha POE or pendimethalin@0.75 kg a.i./ha PE and imazathapyr @ 100 g a.i./ha POE proved effective in reducing total weed density and dry weights of weeds and also increased in weed control efficiency compared with weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“PIGEONPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined hand weeding and herbicide regimes increased weed control efficiency versus a weedy check.

Taxon
PIGEONPEACajanus cajant0
Treatment
one hand weeding/intercultivation at 50 DASe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integration of one hand weeding/intercultivation at 50 DAS with pendimethalin @ 0.75 kg a.i./ha PE or imazathapyr @ 100 g a.i./ha POE or quizalofop ethyl @100 a.i./ha POE or pendimethalin@0.75 kg a.i./ha PE and imazathapyr @ 100 g a.i./ha POE proved effective in reducing total weed density and dry weights of weeds and also increased in weed control efficiency compared with weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“PIGEONPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free conditions produced maximum growth parameters and yield components.

Taxon
PIGEONPEACajanus cajant0
Treatment
weed free situatione0
Outcome
maximum values of growth parameters, yield componentse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum values of growth parameters, yield components and grain yield (2647 kg/ha) were recorded under weed free situation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–953 · show in text ↑
t0

“PIGEONPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free conditions produced maximum grain yield of 2647 kg/ha.

Taxon
PIGEONPEACajanus cajant0
Treatment
weed free situatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2647 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum values of growth parameters, yield components and grain yield (2647 kg/ha) were recorded under weed free situation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–953 · show in text ↑
t0

“PIGEONPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The listed integrated weed management treatments closely followed weed-free conditions for growth, yield components and grain yield.

Taxon
PIGEONPEACajanus cajant0
Treatment
IWM treatmentse0
Outcome
growth parameters, yield components and grain yielde1
Direction
closely followede0
Comparator
weed free situatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was closely followed by IWM treatments viz., integration of pendimethalin @ 0.75 kg a.i./ha PE and imazathapyr @ 100 g a.i./ha POE or pendimethalin@ 0.75 kg a.i./ha PE or imazathapyr @ 100 g a.i./ha POE or quizalofop ethyl @ 100 g a.i./ha POE or pendimethalin @ 0.75 kg a.i./ha PE and quizalofop ethyl @ 100 g a.i./ha POE with one hand weeding/intercultivation at 50 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1331 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth parameters, yield components and grain yield (2647 kg/ha) were recorded under weed free situation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–953 · show in text ↑
t0

“PIGEONPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

herbicide · weed · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.