Paper · 2012 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Response of imidazolinone-tolerant volunteer oilseed rape to herbicides and herbicide mixtures used for broadleaved weed control in sugar beet.

Christoph Krato; Jan Petersen

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Due to a higher proportion of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in sugar beet rotations, volunteer oilseed rape can occur in increased numbers in subsequent crops. The sulfonylurea triflusulfuron is widely used for broad-leaved weed control in sugar beet, but may no longer be effective to control imidazolinone-tolerant volunteers when imidazolinone-tolerant oilseed rape is grown, which is due to a cross-tolerance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Aim of the study was to evaluate six different herbicide strategies for the control of tolerant volunteer oilseed rape. As a result, imidazolinone-tolerant oilseed rape showed a distinctive cross-resistance to triflusulfuron in the field. Mean herbicide efficacy was 14 % and was only slightly increased by combination with metamitron. Imidazolinone-susceptible and -tolerant oilseed rape varieties showed different response to the herbicide treatments. A significantly higher reduction of plant fresh mass (shoot) > 90 % was caused by herbicide treatments that included the active ingredients desmedipham, phenmedipham, ethofumesate, chloridazon and quinmerac. The results showed that triflusulfuron is no longer suitable to control volunteers if they are derived from imidazolinone-tolerance expressing varieties. However, alternative herbicides are available. Generally, increased attention has to be paid to volunteer management within the whole crop rotation if imidazolinonetolerant oilseed rape is grown. Appropriate tillage strategies after oilseed rape harvest have to be followed by effective herbicide treatments in the subsequent sugar beet, for example a mixture of metamitron, phenmedipham, desmedipham, ethofumesat and lenaciel.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidazolinone-tolerant volunteer oilseed rape was cross-resistant to triflusulfuron in the field.

Interactor
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse0weed
Outcome
oilseed rape showed a distinctive cross-resistance to triflusulfurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imidazolinone-tolerant oilseed rape showed a distinctive cross-resistance to triflusulfuron in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean herbicide efficacy was 14%.

Outcome
herbicide efficacye0
Value
14 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean herbicide efficacy was 14 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining triflusulfuron with metamitron only slightly increased efficacy.

Treatment
combination with metamitrone0
Outcome
slightly increasede0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was only slightly increased by combination with metamitron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Susceptible and tolerant varieties responded differently to herbicide treatments.

Interactor
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse0weed
Outcome
different response to the herbicide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus
Brassica napus · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imidazolinone-susceptible and -tolerant oilseed rape varieties showed different response to the herbicide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments including five listed active ingredients reduced shoot fresh mass by over 90%.

Treatment
herbicide treatments that included the active ingredients desmedipham, phenmedipham, ethofumesate, chloridazon and quinmerace0
Outcome
plant fresh mass (shoot)e0
Direction
reductione0
Value
> 90 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significantly higher reduction of plant fresh mass (shoot) > 90 % was caused by herbicide treatments that included the active ingredients desmedipham, phenmedipham, ethofumesate, chloridazon and quinmerac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–142 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Triflusulfuron is unsuitable for control of volunteers from imidazolinone-tolerant varieties.

Outcome
triflusulfuron is no longer suitable to control volunteerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“triflusulfuron is no longer suitable to control volunteers if they are derived from imidazolinone-tolerance expressing varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1257 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–142 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Volunteer management should include tillage and effective herbicide treatment in subsequent sugar beet.

Outcome
Appropriate tillage strategies after oilseed rape harvest have to be followed by effective herbicide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Appropriate tillage strategies after oilseed rape harvest have to be followed by effective herbicide treatments in the subsequent sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1595 · show in text ↑

chloridazon · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

desmedipham · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

ethofumesate · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

phenmedipham · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 12 positive, 9 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.