Paper · 2012 · Journal of Cereal Research

Residual effects of dual-purpose summer legumes and zinc fertilization on succeeding wheat in aromatic hybrid rice-wheat cropping system

S. L. Jat; Yashbir Singh Shivay; Dinesh Kumar; et al.

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2007-08 and 2008-09 at the research farm of the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi; to study the residual effects of dual-purpose summer legumes crops and zinc fertilization on succeeding wheat under aromatic hybrid rice-wheat cropping system. The wheat crop was sown according to aromatic hybrid rice sub-plots on residual fertility and no additional fertilizer was applied to the succeeding wheat. Residual effects of incorporation of dual-purpose summer legumes residue either of cowpea or mungbean and application of 2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O) resulted in higher values of yield attributes, yields, concentrations of Zn in wheat grain, straw and their uptake and net returns of the succeeding wheat. The residual effects of incorporation of mungbean residue resulted in significantly higher grain yield (4.69 and 4.82 t ha-1 respectively during 2007-08 and 2008-09) of succeeding wheat which was on par to residual effect of cowpea residue incorporation. Residual effect of application of 2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O) gave higher yield of 4.90 and 5.09 t ha-1 during 20007-08 and 2008-09, respectively. The higher net returns by the residual effect of incorporation of mungbean residue and application of 2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O) i.e. Rupees 45,757 and Rupees 51, 212 per ha was recorded during 2007-08 and 2008-09 respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea residue incorporation increased wheat yield attributes and yields.

Treatment
cowpeae0
Outcome
yield attributes, yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incorporation of dual-purpose summer legumes residue either of cowpea or mungbean and application of 2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O) resulted in higher values of yield attributes, yields, concentrations of Zn in wheat grain, straw and their uptake and net returns of the succeeding wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean residue incorporation increased wheat yield attributes and yields.

Treatment
mungbeane0
Outcome
yield attributes, yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incorporation of dual-purpose summer legumes residue either of cowpea or mungbean and application of 2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O) resulted in higher values of yield attributes, yields, concentrations of Zn in wheat grain, straw and their uptake and net returns of the succeeding wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZEU fertilization increased wheat yield attributes and yields.

Treatment
2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O)e0
Outcome
yield attributes, yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O) resulted in higher values of yield attributes, yields, concentrations of Zn in wheat grain, straw and their uptake and net returns of the succeeding wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments increased Zn concentration and uptake in wheat grain and straw.

Treatment
incorporation of dual-purpose summer legumes residue either of cowpea or mungbean and application of 2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O)e0
Outcome
concentrations of Zn in wheat grain, straw and their uptakee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incorporation of dual-purpose summer legumes residue either of cowpea or mungbean and application of 2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O) resulted in higher values of yield attributes, yields, concentrations of Zn in wheat grain, straw and their uptake and net returns of the succeeding wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean residue yielded 4.69 t ha-1 in 2007-08 and was on par with cowpea residue.

Treatment
mungbean residuee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.69e0
Qualifier
during 2007-08e0
Comparator
cowpea residue incorporatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incorporation of mungbean residue resulted in significantly higher grain yield (4.69 and 4.82 t ha-1 respectively during 2007-08 and 2008-09) of succeeding wheat which was on par to residual effect of cowpea residue incorporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean residue yielded 4.82 t ha-1 in 2008-09 and was on par with cowpea residue.

Treatment
mungbean residuee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.82 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
during 2007-08 and 2008-09e0
Comparator
cowpea residue incorporatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incorporation of mungbean residue resulted in significantly higher grain yield (4.69 and 4.82 t ha-1 respectively during 2007-08 and 2008-09) of succeeding wheat which was on par to residual effect of cowpea residue incorporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZEU residual fertilization yielded 4.90 t ha-1 in 20007-08.

Treatment
2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.90e0
Qualifier
during 20007-08e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Residual effect of application of 2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O) gave higher yield of 4.90 and 5.09 t ha-1 during 20007-08 and 2008-09, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZEU residual fertilization yielded 5.09 t ha-1 in 2008-09.

Treatment
2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.09 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
2008-09e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Residual effect of application of 2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O) gave higher yield of 4.90 and 5.09 t ha-1 during 20007-08 and 2008-09, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual mungbean incorporation and ZEU application gave higher net returns in 2007-08.

Treatment
incorporation of mungbean residue and application of 2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O)e0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rupees 45,757e0
Qualifier
during 2007-08e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The higher net returns by the residual effect of incorporation of mungbean residue and application of 2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O) i.e. Rupees 45,757 and Rupees 51, 212 per ha was recorded during 2007-08 and 2008-09 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual mungbean incorporation and ZEU application gave higher net returns in 2008-09.

Treatment
incorporation of mungbean residue and application of 2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O)e0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rupees 51, 212 per hae0
Qualifier
2008-09e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The higher net returns by the residual effect of incorporation of mungbean residue and application of 2.0 per cent ZEU (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O) i.e. Rupees 45,757 and Rupees 51, 212 per ha was recorded during 2007-08 and 2008-09 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1407 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

Vigna unguiculata · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Vigna radiata · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.