Paper · 2013 · BIOINFOLET - A Quarterly Journal of Life Sciences

Weed control in kharif green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)

Shaukat Ali; J. C. Patel; L. J. Desai; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Application of imazethapyr 100 g ha −1 at 15–20 DAS was found most effective in reducing weed population, highest percent mortality of weeds (74.52%), less dry weight of weeds (52.09 g per m2), higher WCE (84.38%) as well as lowest WI (7.24%) and it was closely followed by quizalofop-p-ethyl 100 g ha−1 at 15–20 DAS. Imazethapyr 100 g ha−1 at 15–20 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height at harvest (47.0 cm), number of pods per plant (22.8), length of pod (7.1 cm), seed yield per plant (8.16 g), test weight (40.67 g), seed yield (927 kg ha−1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr most effectively reduced weed population.

Treatment
imazethapyr 100 g ha −1 at 15–20 DASe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed populatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of imazethapyr 100 g ha −1 at 15–20 DAS was found most effective in reducing weed population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr caused 74.52% weed mortality.

Treatment
imazethapyr 100 g ha −1 at 15–20 DASe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
percent mortality of weedse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
74.52%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of imazethapyr 100 g ha −1 at 15–20 DAS was found most effective in reducing weed population, highest percent mortality of weeds (74.52%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave lower weed dry weight of 52.09 g per m2.

Treatment
imazethapyr 100 g ha −1 at 15–20 DASe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dry weight of weedse0
Direction
lesse0
Value
52.09 g per m2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of imazethapyr 100 g ha −1 at 15–20 DAS was found most effective in reducing weed population, highest percent mortality of weeds (74.52%), less dry weight of weeds (52.09 g per m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave higher weed control efficiency of 84.38%.

Treatment
imazethapyr 100 g ha −1 at 15–20 DASe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
WCEe0
Direction
highere0
Value
84.38%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of imazethapyr 100 g ha −1 at 15–20 DAS was found most effective in reducing weed population, highest percent mortality of weeds (74.52%), less dry weight of weeds (52.09 g per m2), higher WCE (84.38%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave the lowest weed index of 7.24%.

Treatment
imazethapyr 100 g ha −1 at 15–20 DASe0
Outcome
WIe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
7.24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of imazethapyr 100 g ha −1 at 15–20 DAS was found most effective in reducing weed population, highest percent mortality of weeds (74.52%), less dry weight of weeds (52.09 g per m2), higher WCE (84.38%) as well as lowest WI (7.24%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quizalofop-p-ethyl closely followed imazethapyr in weed control.

Treatment
quizalofop-p-ethyl 100 g ha−1 at 15–20 DASe0
Outcome
closely followede0
Direction
closely followede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“it was closely followed by quizalofop-p-ethyl 100 g ha−1 at 15–20 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave significantly higher plant height at harvest of 47.0 cm.

Treatment
Imazethapyr 100 g ha−1 at 15–20 DASe0
Outcome
plant height at harveste0
Direction
highere0
Value
47.0 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Imazethapyr 100 g ha−1 at 15–20 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height at harvest (47.0 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave significantly higher pods per plant of 22.8.

Treatment
Imazethapyr 100 g ha−1 at 15–20 DASe0
Outcome
number of pods per plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
22.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Imazethapyr 100 g ha−1 at 15–20 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height at harvest (47.0 cm), number of pods per plant (22.8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave significantly higher pod length of 7.1 cm.

Treatment
Imazethapyr 100 g ha−1 at 15–20 DASe0
Outcome
length of pode0
Direction
highere0
Value
7.1 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Imazethapyr 100 g ha−1 at 15–20 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height at harvest (47.0 cm), number of pods per plant (22.8), length of pod (7.1 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave significantly higher seed yield per plant of 8.16 g.

Treatment
Imazethapyr 100 g ha−1 at 15–20 DASe0
Outcome
seed yield per plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
8.16 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Imazethapyr 100 g ha−1 at 15–20 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height at harvest (47.0 cm), number of pods per plant (22.8), length of pod (7.1 cm), seed yield per plant (8.16 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave significantly higher test weight of 40.67 g.

Treatment
Imazethapyr 100 g ha−1 at 15–20 DASe0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
40.67 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Imazethapyr 100 g ha−1 at 15–20 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height at harvest (47.0 cm), number of pods per plant (22.8), length of pod (7.1 cm), seed yield per plant (8.16 g), test weight (40.67 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr gave significantly higher seed yield of 927 kg ha−1.

Treatment
Imazethapyr 100 g ha−1 at 15–20 DASe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
927 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Imazethapyr 100 g ha−1 at 15–20 DAS recorded significantly higher plant height at harvest (47.0 cm), number of pods per plant (22.8), length of pod (7.1 cm), seed yield per plant (8.16 g), test weight (40.67 g), seed yield (927 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–554 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

50 papers: 49 positive, 1 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 46 positive, 6 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Imazethapyr · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.