Paper · 2017 · Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Efficacy of some newer insecticides against mustard aphid Lipaphis erysimi Kalt. in cauliflower

SK Dotasara; Neeraj Agrawal; Narendra Singh; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment on cauliflower var. Pusa Snowball-16 was conducted during Rabi season of year2014-15 at CSAUA&T, Kanpur. Among the various insecticides evaluated against the mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi Kalt, imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.2 g/litre showed highest reduction. Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.2 g/litre reduce the 87.53 % incidence of mustard aphid followed by fipronil 5 SC @ 1.0 ml/litre 83.56 % reduction at 7 days after Ist spray, respectively. Similarly same trend was noticed after 15 days of spraying in which both the chemicals registered 83.86 % and 78.90 %. The experiment was repeated after 15 days to check the aphid population and it was observed that imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.2 g/litre was found best followed by fipronil 5 SC @ 1.0 ml/litre and neem oil 2 % @ 2.0 ml/litre, when the data was recorded after 7 and 15 DAS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 17.8 SL showed the highest reduction of mustard aphid among the insecticides evaluated.

Treatment
imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.2 g/litree1
Interactor
Lipaphis erysimi KaltLipaphis erysimie1pest
Outcome
reductione1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
the various insecticidese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of some newer insecticides against mustard aphid Lipaphis erysimi Kalt. in cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the various insecticides evaluated against the mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi Kalt, imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.2 g/litre showed highest reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 17.8 SL reduced mustard aphid incidence by 87.53 % at 7 days after the first spray.

Treatment
Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.2 g/litree2
Interactor
mustard aphidLipaphis erysimie2pest
Outcome
incidence of mustard aphide2
Direction
reducee2
Value
87.53 %e2
Qualifier
at 7 days after Ist spraye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of some newer insecticides against mustard aphid Lipaphis erysimi Kalt. in cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e2

“Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.2 g/litre reduce the 87.53 % incidence of mustard aphid followed by fipronil 5 SC @ 1.0 ml/litre 83.56 % reduction at 7 days after Ist spray, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fipronil 5 SC reduced mustard aphid incidence by 83.56 % at 7 days after the first spray.

Treatment
fipronil 5 SC @ 1.0 ml/litree2
Interactor
mustard aphidLipaphis erysimie2pest
Outcome
incidence of mustard aphide2
Direction
reductione2
Value
83.56 %e2
Qualifier
at 7 days after Ist spraye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of some newer insecticides against mustard aphid Lipaphis erysimi Kalt. in cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e2

“Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.2 g/litre reduce the 87.53 % incidence of mustard aphid followed by fipronil 5 SC @ 1.0 ml/litre 83.56 % reduction at 7 days after Ist spray, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both imidacloprid and fipronil reduced mustard aphid incidence by 83.86 % and 78.90 % after 15 days of spraying.

Treatment
both the chemicalse3
Interactor
mustard aphidLipaphis erysimie2pest
Outcome
incidence of mustard aphide2
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Value
83.86 % and 78.90 %e3
Qualifier
after 15 days of sprayinge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of some newer insecticides against mustard aphid Lipaphis erysimi Kalt. in cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e2

“Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.2 g/litre reduce the 87.53 % incidence of mustard aphid followed by fipronil 5 SC @ 1.0 ml/litre 83.56 % reduction at 7 days after Ist spray, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–455 · show in text ↑
e3

“Similarly same trend was noticed after 15 days of spraying in which both the chemicals registered 83.86 % and 78.90 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 15 days, imidacloprid 17.8 SL was found best against the aphid population, followed by fipronil 5 SC and neem oil 2 %.

Treatment
imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.2 g/litree4
Interactor
aphide4pest
Outcome
aphid populatione4
Direction
beste4
Comparator
fipronil 5 SC @ 1.0 ml/litre and neem oil 2 % @ 2.0 ml/litree4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of some newer insecticides against mustard aphid Lipaphis erysimi Kalt. in cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e4

“The experiment was repeated after 15 days to check the aphid population and it was observed that imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.2 g/litre was found best followed by fipronil 5 SC @ 1.0 ml/litre and neem oil 2 % @ 2.0 ml/litre, when the data was recorded after 7 and 15 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–842 · show in text ↑

fipronil · Lipaphis erysimi · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

imidacloprid · Lipaphis erysimi · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

imidacloprid · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.