Paper · 2016 · Field Crops Research

Root traits confer grain yield advantages under terminal drought in chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)

Purushothaman Ramamoorthy; Krishnamurthy Lakshmanan; Hari D. Upadhyaya; et al.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
110
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Chickpea, the second most important legume crop, suffers major yield losses by terminal drought stress (DS). Stronger root system is known to enhance drought yields but this understanding remains controversial. To understand precisely the root traits contribution towards yield, 12 chickpea genotypes with well-known drought response were field evaluated under drought and optimal irrigation. Root traits, such as root length density (RLD), total root dry weight (RDW), deep root dry weight (deep RDW) and root:shoot ratio (RSR), were measured periodically by soil coring up to 1.2 m soil depth across drought treatments. Large variations were observed for RLD, RDW, deep RDW and RSR in both the drought treatments. DS increased RLD below 30 cm soil depth, deep RDW, RSR but decreased the root diameter. DS increased the genetic variation in RDW more at the penultimate soil depths. Genetic variation under drought was the widest for RLD ∼50 DAS, for deep RDW ∼50-75 DAS and for RSR at 35 DAS. Genotypes ICC 4958, ICC 8261, Annigeri, ICC 14799, ICC 283 and ICC 867 at vegetative stage and genotypes ICC 14778, ICCV 10, ICC 3325, ICC 14799 and ICC 1882 at the reproductive phase produced greater RLD. Path- and correlation coefficients revealed strong positive contributions of RLD after 45 DAS, deep RDW at vicinity of maturity and RSR at early podfill stages to yield under drought. Breeding for the best combination of profuse RLD at surface soil depths, and RDW at deeper soil layers, was proposed to be the best selection strategy, for an efficient water use and an enhanced terminal drought tolerance in chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length density, root dry weight, deep root dry weight and root:shoot ratio varied widely across drought treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
Large variationse0
Qualifier
RLD, RDW, deep RDW and RSRe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Large variations were observed for RLD, RDW, deep RDW and RSR in both the drought treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased root length density below 30 cm, deep root dry weight and root:shoot ratio.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
RLD below 30 cm soil depth, deep RDW, RSRe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DS increased RLD below 30 cm soil depth, deep RDW, RSR but decreased the root diameter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased root diameter.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
root diametere0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DS increased RLD below 30 cm soil depth, deep RDW, RSR but decreased the root diameter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased genetic variation in root dry weight at the penultimate soil depths.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
genetic variation in RDWe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
penultimate soil depthse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DS increased the genetic variation in RDW more at the penultimate soil depths.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, genetic variation was widest for root length density around 50 days after sowing.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
Genetic variation under drought was the widest for RLDe0
Direction
wideste0
Qualifier
∼50 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genetic variation under drought was the widest for RLD ∼50 DAS, for deep RDW ∼50-75 DAS and for RSR at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, genetic variation was widest for deep root dry weight around 50 to 75 days after sowing.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
deep RDWe0
Direction
wideste0
Qualifier
∼50-75 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genetic variation under drought was the widest for RLD ∼50 DAS, for deep RDW ∼50-75 DAS and for RSR at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, genetic variation was widest for root:shoot ratio at 35 days after sowing.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
RSRe0
Direction
wideste0
Qualifier
35 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genetic variation under drought was the widest for RLD ∼50 DAS, for deep RDW ∼50-75 DAS and for RSR at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the vegetative stage, ICC 4958, ICC 8261, Annigeri, ICC 14799, ICC 283 and ICC 867 had greater root length density.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
ICC 4958, ICC 8261, Annigeri, ICC 14799, ICC 283 and ICC 867e0
Organ / stage
vegetative stagee0
Outcome
RLDe0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes ICC 4958, ICC 8261, Annigeri, ICC 14799, ICC 283 and ICC 867 at vegetative stage and genotypes ICC 14778, ICCV 10, ICC 3325, ICC 14799 and ICC 1882 at the reproductive phase produced greater RLD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the reproductive phase, ICC 14778, ICCV 10, ICC 3325, ICC 14799 and ICC 1882 had greater root length density.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
ICC 14778, ICCV 10, ICC 3325, ICC 14799 and ICC 1882e0
Organ / stage
reproductive phasee0
Outcome
RLDe0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes ICC 4958, ICC 8261, Annigeri, ICC 14799, ICC 283 and ICC 867 at vegetative stage and genotypes ICC 14778, ICCV 10, ICC 3325, ICC 14799 and ICC 1882 at the reproductive phase produced greater RLD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length density after 45 days after sowing contributed positively to drought yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
RLD after 45 DASe0
Outcome
yield under droughte0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Path- and correlation coefficients revealed strong positive contributions of RLD after 45 DAS, deep RDW at vicinity of maturity and RSR at early podfill stages to yield under drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep root dry weight near maturity contributed positively to drought yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
deep RDW at vicinity of maturitye0
Outcome
yield under droughte0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Path- and correlation coefficients revealed strong positive contributions of RLD after 45 DAS, deep RDW at vicinity of maturity and RSR at early podfill stages to yield under drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root:shoot ratio at early podfill contributed positively to drought yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
RSR at early podfill stagese0
Outcome
yield under droughte0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Path- and correlation coefficients revealed strong positive contributions of RLD after 45 DAS, deep RDW at vicinity of maturity and RSR at early podfill stages to yield under drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed breeding for high surface root length density and deep root dry weight to improve water use and terminal drought tolerance.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
best selection strategy, for an efficient water use and an enhanced terminal drought tolerancee0
Qualifier
profuse RLD at surface soil depths, and RDW at deeper soil layerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Breeding for the best combination of profuse RLD at surface soil depths, and RDW at deeper soil layers, was proposed to be the best selection strategy, for an efficient water use and an enhanced terminal drought tolerance in chickpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1618 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

48 papers: 9 positive, 39 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.