Paper · 2008 · Horticultural Science and Technology

The effect of calcium chloride, prohexadione-Ca, and Ca-coated paper bagging on reduction of bitter pit in 'Gamhong' apple.

Kim DaeHyun; Byun JaeKyun; Choi Cheol; et al.

7
claims
23
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Gamhong’ is a midseason, high fresh eating quality red apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) that has high popularity in Korea. ‘Gamhong’ however is prone to bitter pit or russet. Over two growing seasons, different types of calcium (Ca) were applied in either soil or foliar spray to 5 year-old ‘Gamhong’/M.26 apples which had severe bitter pit in 2004. We sprayed calcium chloride (CaCl2), prohexadione-Ca (Pro-Ca) to soil or leaves, and covered fruits with Ca-coated paper bags in 2005. Drenching lime stone liquid or CaCl2 solution on soil were not effective in the reduction of bitter pit, while foliar spraying two times of 0.5% CaCl2 before paper bagging was effective in the reduction of bitter pit while increasing Ca content of peels. Great effect on reduction of bitter pit and on enhancement of Ca content in peels was attained by three different treatments: leaves spraying of 0.5% CaCl2 three times before bagging; Pro-Ca spraying five days after full blooming; and Ca-coated paper bagging 4-5 weeks after full blooming. However, the best result was shown by foliar spraying three times of 0.5% CaCl2 followed by Ca-coated paper bagging.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil drenching with limestone liquid or CaCl2 solution was not effective in reducing bitter pit in Gamhong apple.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Material
Gamhongt0
Treatment
Drenching lime stone liquid or CaCl2 solution on soile1
Outcome
reduction of bitter pite1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drenching lime stone liquid or CaCl2 solution on soil were not effective in the reduction of bitter pit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“reduction of bitter pit in 'Gamhong' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying twice with 0.5% CaCl2 before paper bagging was effective in reducing bitter pit in Gamhong apple.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Material
Gamhongt0
Treatment
foliar spraying two times of 0.5% CaCl2 before paper bagginge2
Outcome
reduction of bitter pite2
Direction
effectivee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“foliar spraying two times of 0.5% CaCl2 before paper bagging was effective in the reduction of bitter pit while increasing Ca content of peels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“reduction of bitter pit in 'Gamhong' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying twice with 0.5% CaCl2 before paper bagging increased Ca content of Gamhong apple peels.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Material
Gamhongt0
Treatment
foliar spraying two times of 0.5% CaCl2 before paper bagginge2
Outcome
Ca content of peelse2
Direction
increasinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“foliar spraying two times of 0.5% CaCl2 before paper bagging was effective in the reduction of bitter pit while increasing Ca content of peels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“reduction of bitter pit in 'Gamhong' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying three times with 0.5% CaCl2 before bagging had a great effect on reducing bitter pit and raising peel Ca content.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Material
Gamhongt0
Treatment
leaves spraying of 0.5% CaCl2 three times before bagginge3
Outcome
reduction of bitter pit and on enhancement of Ca content in peelse3
Direction
Great effecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“Great effect on reduction of bitter pit and on enhancement of Ca content in peels was attained by three different treatments: leaves spraying of 0.5% CaCl2 three times before bagging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“reduction of bitter pit in 'Gamhong' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pro-Ca spraying five days after full bloom had a great effect on reducing bitter pit and raising peel Ca content in Gamhong apple.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Material
Gamhongt0
Treatment
Pro-Ca spraying five days after full bloominge4
Outcome
reduction of bitter pit and on enhancement of Ca content in peelse3
Direction
Great effecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“Great effect on reduction of bitter pit and on enhancement of Ca content in peels was attained by three different treatments: leaves spraying of 0.5% CaCl2 three times before bagging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–920 · show in text ↑
e4

“Pro-Ca spraying five days after full blooming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“reduction of bitter pit in 'Gamhong' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca-coated paper bagging 4-5 weeks after full bloom had a great effect on reducing bitter pit and raising peel Ca content in Gamhong apple.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Material
Gamhongt0
Treatment
Ca-coated paper bagging 4-5 weeks after full bloominge5
Outcome
reduction of bitter pit and on enhancement of Ca content in peelse3
Direction
Great effecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“Great effect on reduction of bitter pit and on enhancement of Ca content in peels was attained by three different treatments: leaves spraying of 0.5% CaCl2 three times before bagging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–920 · show in text ↑
e5

“Ca-coated paper bagging 4-5 weeks after full blooming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“reduction of bitter pit in 'Gamhong' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying three times with 0.5% CaCl2 followed by Ca-coated paper bagging gave the best result among the treatments.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Material
Gamhongt0
Treatment
foliar spraying three times of 0.5% CaCl2 followed by Ca-coated paper bagginge6
Outcome
best resulte6
Direction
beste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–85 · show in text ↑
e6

“However, the best result was shown by foliar spraying three times of 0.5% CaCl2 followed by Ca-coated paper bagging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“reduction of bitter pit in 'Gamhong' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–122 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 25 positive, 7 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

prohexadione · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

trap barrier · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 100 positive, 16 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.