Paper · 2008

Sulphur fertilization for safflower in different soil types of India.

D. M. Hegde; S. E. Knights; T. D. Potter

16
claims
55
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sulphur has become one of the major limiting nutrients in increasing the production of oilseed crops including safflower. To study the response of safflower to levels and sources of sulphur, an experiment was carried out from 1995-96 to 2006-07 at eight locations representing different agro-ecological regions of India. The soils were clay Chromusterts at Tandur, Phaltan, Parbhani and Indore, Typic Chromusterts at Annigeri, Vertic Ustochrepts at Solapur and Arnej and Typic Haplusterts at Akola. The treatments comprised of combinations of three levels of sulphur (15, 30 and 45 kg/ha) and four sources of sulphur [ammonium sulphate (AS), single super phosphate (SSP), elemental sulphur and gypsum] along with a control (no sulphur) replicated 3 times in randomized block design. The pooled analysis of seed yield data indicated that, at Akola, there was significant response upto 45 kg S/ha and SSP was the best source. At Annigeri, the crop responded significantly up to 30 kg S/ha and SSP was the best source. However, at Solapur, safflower responded upto 45 kg S/ha with SSP as the ideal source. At Indore, the response was significant upto 30 kg S/ha and SSP and elemental sulphur were equally effective. At Parbhani, safflower responded upto 30 kg S/ha and elemental sulphur was the best. At Arnej, safflower responded significantly upto 45 kg S/ha and AS was the best source. The response up to 45 kg S/ha was noticed at Tandur while at Phaltan, it was limited upto 15 kg/ha and SSP was the best source at both locations. The study clearly showed significant response of safflower to sulphur application and the magnitude of response and source of sulphur depended on the available soil sulphur status and soil type respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At Akola, safflower seed yield responded significantly up to 45 kg S/ha.

Treatment
45 kg S/hae1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Comparator
control (no sulphur)e2
Setting
Akolae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sulphur fertilization for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pooled analysis of seed yield data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Akola, there was significant response upto 45 kg S/ha and SSP was the best source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–922 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with a control (no sulphur) replicated 3 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Akola, SSP was the best sulphur source for safflower seed yield.

Treatment
SSPe1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede1
Setting
Akolae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sulphur fertilization for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pooled analysis of seed yield data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“at Akola, there was significant response upto 45 kg S/ha and SSP was the best source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At Annigeri, safflower seed yield responded significantly up to 30 kg S/ha.

Treatment
30 kg S/hae1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Comparator
control (no sulphur)e2
Setting
Annigerie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sulphur fertilization for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pooled analysis of seed yield data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Annigeri, the crop responded significantly up to 30 kg S/ha and SSP was the best source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1014 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with a control (no sulphur) replicated 3 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Annigeri, SSP was the best sulphur source for safflower seed yield.

Treatment
SSPe1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede1
Setting
Annigerie1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sulphur fertilization for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pooled analysis of seed yield data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Annigeri, the crop responded significantly up to 30 kg S/ha and SSP was the best source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Solapur, safflower seed yield responded up to 45 kg S/ha.

Treatment
45 kg S/hae1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Comparator
control (no sulphur)e2
Setting
Solapure1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sulphur fertilization for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pooled analysis of seed yield data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, at Solapur, safflower responded upto 45 kg S/ha with SSP as the ideal source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1101 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with a control (no sulphur) replicated 3 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Solapur, SSP was the ideal sulphur source for safflower seed yield.

Treatment
SSPe1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede1
Setting
Solapure1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sulphur fertilization for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pooled analysis of seed yield data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, at Solapur, safflower responded upto 45 kg S/ha with SSP as the ideal source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At Indore, safflower seed yield responded significantly up to 30 kg S/ha.

Treatment
30 kg S/hae1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Comparator
control (no sulphur)e2
Setting
Indoree1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sulphur fertilization for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pooled analysis of seed yield data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Indore, the response was significant upto 30 kg S/ha and SSP and elemental sulphur were equally effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1211 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with a control (no sulphur) replicated 3 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Indore, SSP and elemental sulphur were equally effective for safflower seed yield.

Treatment
SSPe1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Comparator
elemental sulphure1
Setting
Indoree1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sulphur fertilization for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pooled analysis of seed yield data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Indore, the response was significant upto 30 kg S/ha and SSP and elemental sulphur were equally effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Parbhani, safflower seed yield responded up to 30 kg S/ha.

Treatment
30 kg S/hae1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Comparator
control (no sulphur)e2
Setting
Parbhanie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sulphur fertilization for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pooled analysis of seed yield data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Parbhani, safflower responded upto 30 kg S/ha and elemental sulphur was the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1296 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with a control (no sulphur) replicated 3 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Parbhani, elemental sulphur was the best sulphur source for safflower seed yield.

Treatment
elemental sulphure1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede1
Setting
Parbhanie1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sulphur fertilization for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pooled analysis of seed yield data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Parbhani, safflower responded upto 30 kg S/ha and elemental sulphur was the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At Arnej, safflower seed yield responded significantly up to 45 kg S/ha.

Treatment
45 kg S/hae1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Comparator
control (no sulphur)e2
Setting
Arneje1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sulphur fertilization for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pooled analysis of seed yield data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Arnej, safflower responded significantly upto 45 kg S/ha and AS was the best source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1384 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with a control (no sulphur) replicated 3 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Arnej, ammonium sulphate (AS) was the best sulphur source for safflower seed yield.

Treatment
ASe1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede1
Setting
Arneje1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sulphur fertilization for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pooled analysis of seed yield data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Arnej, safflower responded significantly upto 45 kg S/ha and AS was the best source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1384 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Tandur, safflower seed yield responded up to 45 kg S/ha.

Treatment
45 kg S/hae1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Comparator
control (no sulphur)e2
Setting
Tandure1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sulphur fertilization for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pooled analysis of seed yield data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“The response up to 45 kg S/ha was noticed at Tandur while at Phaltan, it was limited upto 15 kg/ha and SSP was the best source at both locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1530 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with a control (no sulphur) replicated 3 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Phaltan, the safflower seed yield response was limited to 15 kg/ha.

Treatment
15 kg/hae1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Comparator
control (no sulphur)e2
Setting
Phaltane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sulphur fertilization for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pooled analysis of seed yield data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“The response up to 45 kg S/ha was noticed at Tandur while at Phaltan, it was limited upto 15 kg/ha and SSP was the best source at both locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1530 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with a control (no sulphur) replicated 3 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP was the best sulphur source for safflower seed yield at both Tandur and Phaltan.

Treatment
SSPe1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede1
Setting
both locationse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sulphur fertilization for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pooled analysis of seed yield data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“The response up to 45 kg S/ha was noticed at Tandur while at Phaltan, it was limited upto 15 kg/ha and SSP was the best source at both locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1530 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The magnitude of safflower response to sulphur and the best sulphur source depended on soil sulphur status and soil type.

Treatment
sulphur applicatione3
Outcome
magnitude of responsee3
Qualifier
available soil sulphur status and soil typee3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sulphur fertilization for safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–35 · show in text ↑
e3

“The study clearly showed significant response of safflower to sulphur application and the magnitude of response and source of sulphur depended on the available soil sulphur status and soil type respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1738 · show in text ↑

ammonium sulfate · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

elemental sulfur · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.