Paper · 2009 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Alternate Host Range and Management of Riptortus pedestris F. Infesting Cowpea

T. Bharathimeena; K. Sudharma

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The ornamental plant, Caesalpinnia pulcherrima and the weed, Cassia occidentalis were new reports of host plants of Riptortus pedestris. Imidacloprid 0.005% treated plants recorded significantly lower counts of R. pedestris nymphs and the highest yield, the toxic effect being on par with dimethoate 0.05%. Rapid knock down of adults and nymphs with further persistence in the field was evidently higher for fenvalerate 0.03% and lambda-cyhalothrin 0.002%. The effect of chlorpyrifos 0.03% was on par with imidacloprid 0.005% in 15th day and malathion 0.05% in the 7th day, in suppressing the nymphal and adult populations, respectively after first spraying. Among the botanical insecticides, crude neem oil emulsion 5 ml L−1 was on par with 0.03% azadirachtin emulsion 2ml L−1 in reducing the nymphal counts of R. pedestris and significantly superior in terms of yield when compared with 1% azadirachtin emulsion 2ml L−1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Caesalpinnia pulcherrima is a new host plant of Riptortus pedestris.

Taxon
Caesalpinnia pulcherrimae1
Interactor
Riptortus pedestrisRiptortus pedestrise1pest
Outcome
new reports of host plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Riptortus pedestris
Riptortus pedestris · InteractorPhonon.b · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The ornamental plant, Caesalpinnia pulcherrima and the weed, Cassia occidentalis were new reports of host plants of Riptortus pedestris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassia occidentalis is a new host plant of Riptortus pedestris.

Taxon
Cassia occidentalisSenna occidentalise1
Interactor
Riptortus pedestrisRiptortus pedestrise1pest
Outcome
new reports of host plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Senna occidentalis
Senna occidentalis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Riptortus pedestris
Riptortus pedestris · InteractorPhonon.b · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The ornamental plant, Caesalpinnia pulcherrima and the weed, Cassia occidentalis were new reports of host plants of Riptortus pedestris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 0.005% treated cowpea plants had significantly lower counts of R. pedestris nymphs.

Treatment
Imidacloprid 0.005%e2
Interactor
R. pedestrisRiptortus pedestrise2pest
Outcome
counts of R. pedestris nymphse2
Direction
lowere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Riptortus pedestris
Riptortus pedestris · InteractorPhonon.b · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Imidacloprid 0.005% treated plants recorded significantly lower counts of R. pedestris nymphs and the highest yield, the toxic effect being on par with dimethoate 0.05%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Infesting Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 0.005% treated cowpea plants gave the highest yield.

Treatment
Imidacloprid 0.005%e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Imidacloprid 0.005% treated plants recorded significantly lower counts of R. pedestris nymphs and the highest yield, the toxic effect being on par with dimethoate 0.05%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Infesting Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The toxic effect of imidacloprid 0.005% on cowpea pests was on par with dimethoate 0.05%.

Treatment
Imidacloprid 0.005%e2
Outcome
toxic effecte2
Direction
on pare2
Comparator
dimethoate 0.05%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Imidacloprid 0.005% treated plants recorded significantly lower counts of R. pedestris nymphs and the highest yield, the toxic effect being on par with dimethoate 0.05%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Infesting Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenvalerate 0.03% and lambda-cyhalothrin 0.002% gave higher rapid knock down of adults and nymphs that persisted in the field.

Treatment
fenvalerate 0.03% and lambda-cyhalothrin 0.002%e4
Outcome
Rapid knock down of adults and nymphse4
Direction
highere4
Setting
in the fielde4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Rapid knock down of adults and nymphs with further persistence in the field was evidently higher for fenvalerate 0.03% and lambda-cyhalothrin 0.002%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Infesting Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyrifos 0.03% was on par with imidacloprid 0.005% in suppressing nymphal populations on the 15th day.

Treatment
chlorpyrifos 0.03%e5
Outcome
suppressing the nymphale5
Direction
on pare5
Qualifier
15th daye5
Comparator
imidacloprid 0.005%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The effect of chlorpyrifos 0.03% was on par with imidacloprid 0.005% in 15th day and malathion 0.05% in the 7th day, in suppressing the nymphal and adult populations, respectively after first spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“Infesting Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malathion 0.05% suppressed adult populations on the 7th day.

Treatment
malathion 0.05%e5
Outcome
adult populationse5
Qualifier
7th daye5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The effect of chlorpyrifos 0.03% was on par with imidacloprid 0.005% in 15th day and malathion 0.05% in the 7th day, in suppressing the nymphal and adult populations, respectively after first spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“Infesting Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude neem oil emulsion 5 ml L−1 was on par with 0.03% azadirachtin emulsion in reducing R. pedestris nymphal counts.

Treatment
crude neem oil emulsion 5 ml L−1e6
Interactor
R. pedestrisRiptortus pedestrise6pest
Outcome
reducing the nymphal countse6
Direction
on pare6
Comparator
0.03% azadirachtin emulsion 2ml L−1e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Riptortus pedestris
Riptortus pedestris · InteractorPhonon.b · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Among the botanical insecticides, crude neem oil emulsion 5 ml L−1 was on par with 0.03% azadirachtin emulsion 2ml L−1 in reducing the nymphal counts of R. pedestris and significantly superior in terms of yield when compared with 1% azadirachtin emulsion 2ml L−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“Infesting Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude neem oil emulsion 5 ml L−1 gave significantly superior cowpea yield compared with 1% azadirachtin emulsion.

Treatment
crude neem oil emulsion 5 ml L−1e6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
significantly superiore6
Comparator
1% azadirachtin emulsion 2ml L−1e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Among the botanical insecticides, crude neem oil emulsion 5 ml L−1 was on par with 0.03% azadirachtin emulsion 2ml L−1 in reducing the nymphal counts of R. pedestris and significantly superior in terms of yield when compared with 1% azadirachtin emulsion 2ml L−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“Infesting Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 · show in text ↑

malathion · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

imidacloprid · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

lambda-cyhalothrin · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

imidacloprid · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

botanical · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 78 positive, 2 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.