Paper · 2011 · Pesticide Research Journal

Effect of Newer Pesticide Schedules on the Population of Sucking Pests and Predators on Okra

A Mohanasundaram; RK Sharma

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field study was carried out to determine the efficacy of different treatment schedules against major sucking pests viz., leafhoppers, whitefly and red spider mite and their predators on okra, Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench during the kharif 2008 and 2009. Each treatment comprised three sprays; first spray was given 35 d after seed sowing and thereafter at 15 d intervals, except treatment 9 where seed treatment was done and two sprays were given along with 2nd and 3rd spray as in rest other treatments. The results showed that thiamethoxam 20 g a.i/ha, fipronil 50 g a.i/ha and endosulfan @ 700 g a.i/ha effectively reduced the sucking pests viz., leafhopper, whitefly and red spider mite population during 1st, 2nd, and 3rd sprays over two seasons, respectively. The activity of insect predatory population (coccinellids and spiders) in treatment schedules T1 and T3 comprising of Neemazal/Econeem @ 2ml/L, emamectin benzoate @ 10 g a.i/ha and endosulfan @ 700 g a.i/ha were found to be at par with untreated check indicating non-hazardous to these predominant natural enemies in okra ecosystem.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

thiamethoxam 20 g a.i/ha reduced sucking pest populations in okra.

Treatment
thiamethoxam 20 g a.i/hae0
Outcome
sucking pests viz., leafhopper, whitefly and red spider mite populatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiamethoxam 20 g a.i/ha, fipronil 50 g a.i/ha and endosulfan @ 700 g a.i/ha effectively reduced the sucking pests viz., leafhopper, whitefly and red spider mite population during 1st, 2nd, and 3rd sprays over two seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–772 · show in text ↑
e1

“on okra, Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fipronil 50 g a.i/ha reduced sucking pest populations in okra.

Treatment
fipronil 50 g a.i/hae0
Outcome
sucking pests viz., leafhopper, whitefly and red spider mite populatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiamethoxam 20 g a.i/ha, fipronil 50 g a.i/ha and endosulfan @ 700 g a.i/ha effectively reduced the sucking pests viz., leafhopper, whitefly and red spider mite population during 1st, 2nd, and 3rd sprays over two seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–772 · show in text ↑
e1

“on okra, Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

endosulfan @ 700 g a.i/ha reduced sucking pest populations in okra.

Treatment
endosulfan @ 700 g a.i/hae0
Outcome
sucking pests viz., leafhopper, whitefly and red spider mite populatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiamethoxam 20 g a.i/ha, fipronil 50 g a.i/ha and endosulfan @ 700 g a.i/ha effectively reduced the sucking pests viz., leafhopper, whitefly and red spider mite population during 1st, 2nd, and 3rd sprays over two seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–772 · show in text ↑
e1

“on okra, Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predatory coccinellid and spider populations under T1 and T3 were comparable to untreated checks.

Treatment
treatment schedules T1 and T3e0
Outcome
activity of insect predatory population (coccinellids and spiders)e0
Direction
at par withe0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of insect predatory population (coccinellids and spiders) in treatment schedules T1 and T3 comprising of Neemazal/Econeem @ 2ml/L, emamectin benzoate @ 10 g a.i/ha and endosulfan @ 700 g a.i/ha were found to be at par with untreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–1025 · show in text ↑
e1

“on okra, Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–228 · show in text ↑

fipronil · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

thiamethoxam · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

endosulfan · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.