Paper · 1984 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Effect of Herbicides on Weed Control and Grain Yield of Wheat in Mid-Himalayan Conditions1

Kamta Prasad

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Five herbicides were evaluated for their weed control efficacy and influence on wheat grain yield for three winter seasons of 1978–79, 1979–80 and 1980–81 at Hawalbagh, Almora. Use of methabenzthiazuron, Metoxuron and Isoproturon caused significant reduction in weed biomass production resulting in increased grain yields. Weed control efficacy was lower in hand weeding, terbutryn and diclofop-methyl treatments. The highest mean grain yield was obtained with isoproturon at 1.00 kg/ha and metoxuron at 1.75 kg/ha (both as post-emergnce) and the lowest in unweeded check followed by hand weeding once. A low degree of phytotoxicity was observed in wheat with terbutryn and diclofopmethyl.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Methabenzthiazuron reduced weed biomass significantly.

Treatment
methabenzthiazurone0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomass productione0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Use of methabenzthiazuron, Metoxuron and Isoproturon caused significant reduction in weed biomass production resulting in increased grain yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Metoxuron reduced weed biomass significantly.

Treatment
Metoxurone0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomass productione0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Use of methabenzthiazuron, Metoxuron and Isoproturon caused significant reduction in weed biomass production resulting in increased grain yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon reduced weed biomass significantly.

Treatment
Isoproturone0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomass productione0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Use of methabenzthiazuron, Metoxuron and Isoproturon caused significant reduction in weed biomass production resulting in increased grain yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These herbicides increased grain yield as a consequence of weed suppression.

Treatment
methabenzthiazuron, Metoxuron and Isoproturone0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Use of methabenzthiazuron, Metoxuron and Isoproturon caused significant reduction in weed biomass production resulting in increased grain yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding had lower weed control efficacy.

Treatment
hand weedinge0
Outcome
Weed control efficacye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control efficacy was lower in hand weeding, terbutryn and diclofop-methyl treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Terbutryn had lower weed control efficacy.

Treatment
terbutryne0
Outcome
Weed control efficacye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control efficacy was lower in hand weeding, terbutryn and diclofop-methyl treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclofop-methyl had lower weed control efficacy.

Treatment
diclofop-methyle0
Outcome
Weed control efficacye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control efficacy was lower in hand weeding, terbutryn and diclofop-methyl treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon at 1.00 kg/ha gave the highest mean grain yield.

Treatment
isoproturon at 1.00 kg/hae0
Outcome
mean grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
unweeded checke0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest mean grain yield was obtained with isoproturon at 1.00 kg/ha and metoxuron at 1.75 kg/ha (both as post-emergnce) and the lowest in unweeded check followed by hand weeding once.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metoxuron at 1.75 kg/ha gave the highest mean grain yield.

Treatment
metoxuron at 1.75 kg/hae0
Outcome
mean grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
unweeded checke0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest mean grain yield was obtained with isoproturon at 1.00 kg/ha and metoxuron at 1.75 kg/ha (both as post-emergnce) and the lowest in unweeded check followed by hand weeding once.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–602 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unweeded control had the lowest grain yield, followed by one hand weeding.

Treatment
unweeded checke0
Outcome
mean grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest mean grain yield was obtained with isoproturon at 1.00 kg/ha and metoxuron at 1.75 kg/ha (both as post-emergnce) and the lowest in unweeded check followed by hand weeding once.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Terbutryn caused low wheat phytotoxicity.

Treatment
terbutryne0
Outcome
phytotoxicitye0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A low degree of phytotoxicity was observed in wheat with terbutryn and diclofopmethyl.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclofopmethyl caused low wheat phytotoxicity.

Treatment
diclofopmethyle0
Outcome
phytotoxicitye0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A low degree of phytotoxicity was observed in wheat with terbutryn and diclofopmethyl.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–689 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

terbutryn · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Methabenzthiazuron · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

terbutryn · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

metoxuron · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

diclofop-methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 5 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

isoproturon · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 72 positive, 2 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

Methabenzthiazuron · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.