Abstract
All the tested insecticides and bio pesticides were found to be statistically superior over the control. The treatment with indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 lit/ha yielded lowest shoot and fruit damage of 1.6% and 3.3%, respectively. The aforesaid treatment gave maximum marketable fruit yield 93.26 q/ha with maximum increase in yield over control (38.23 q/ha) and also proved profitable as per maximum cost benefit ratio of 1: 9.9 followed by carbosulfan 25 EC, lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC and cartap hydrochloride 50 SP with yield levels of 89.26, 86.79 and 83.73 q/ha, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
All tested insecticides and biopesticides were statistically superior to the control.
- Taxon
- Okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- insecticides and bio pesticidese0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedOutcome
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“All the tested insecticides and bio pesticides were found to be statistically superior over the control”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb treatment produced the lowest shoot damage, 1.6%.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 lit/hae0
- Outcome
- shoote0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 1.6%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 lit/ha yielded lowest shoot and fruit damage of 1.6% and 3.3%, respectively”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb treatment produced the lowest fruit damage, 3.3%.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 lit/hae0
- Outcome
- fruit damagee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 3.3%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 lit/ha yielded lowest shoot and fruit damage of 1.6% and 3.3%, respectively”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb produced the maximum marketable fruit yield of 93.26 q/ha.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 lit/hae0
- Outcome
- marketable fruit yielde1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 93.26 q/hae1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 lit/ha”
e1“maximum marketable fruit yield 93.26 q/ha”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb had the maximum yield increase over the control, 38.23 q/ha.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 lit/hae0
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Value
- 38.23 q/hae1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 lit/ha”
e1“maximum increase in yield over control (38.23 q/ha)”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb had the maximum cost benefit ratio, 1: 9.9.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 lit/hae0
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 1: 9.9e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 lit/ha”
e1“maximum cost benefit ratio of 1: 9.9”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbosulfan 25 EC yielded 89.26 q/ha.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- carbosulfan 25 ECe0
- Outcome
- yield levelse0
- Value
- 89.26e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“carbosulfan 25 EC, lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC and cartap hydrochloride 50 SP with yield levels of 89.26, 86.79 and 83.73 q/ha, respectively”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC yielded 86.79 q/ha.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- lambda cyhalothrin 5 ECe0
- Outcome
- yield levelse0
- Value
- 86.79e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC and cartap hydrochloride 50 SP with yield levels of 89.26, 86.79 and 83.73 q/ha, respectively”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Cartap hydrochloride 50 SP yielded 83.73 q/ha.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- cartap hydrochloride 50 SPe0
- Outcome
- yield levelse0
- Value
- 83.73 q/hae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cartap hydrochloride 50 SP with yield levels of 89.26, 86.79 and 83.73 q/ha, respectively”
t0“Okra”
The same questions in other papers
indoxacarb · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →lambda-cyhalothrin · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →indoxacarb · quality: postharvest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
carbosulfan · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
indoxacarb · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.