Paper · 2024 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Introgressed eggplant lines with the wild Solanum incanum evaluated under drought stress conditions

Martín Flores-Saavedra; Pietro Gramazio; Santiago Vilanova; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

As access to irrigation water becomes increasingly limited, introgression of relevant genomic regions from drought-tolerant wild genotypes is a promising breeding strategy for crop plants. In this study, nine eggplant (Solanum melongena) introgression lines (ILs) covering altogether 71.6% of the genome of the donor wild relative parent S. incanum were evaluated for drought tolerance under water stress conditions. Plants at the five true leaves stage were irrigated at either 100% (control) or 30% (water stress) field capacity for 14 days, and growth and biochemical traits were measured. Reduced irrigation resulted in decreased growth and increased levels of stress markers such as proline and malondialdehyde. Most ILs had lower growth and biomass production than the cultivated parent under both conditions. However, the wild alleles for two genomic regions related to stem and root dry weight (dwt8 and dwr6%) conferred improved tolerance to water stress. In addition, several S. incanum alleles had a positive effect on important traits that may improve yield under drought conditions, such as leaf water content (lwc12%), water use efficiency (wue1%) and chlorophyll content (chl2 and chl8%). Fine-mapping of the genomic regions for tolerance and reducing linkage drag with regions affecting growth will be crucial for significantly improving eggplant drought tolerance through introgression breeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation decreased growth of eggplant compared with 100% field capacity irrigation.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae0
Treatment
Reduced irrigatione1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
100% (control)e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine eggplant (Solanum melongena) introgression lines (ILs) covering altogether 71.6% of the genome of the donor wild relative parent S. incanum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–348 · show in text ↑
e1

“Reduced irrigation resulted in decreased growth and increased levels of stress markers such as proline and malondialdehyde”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–715 · show in text ↑
e5

“Plants at the five true leaves stage were irrigated at either 100% (control) or 30% (water stress) field capacity for 14 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation increased stress markers proline and malondialdehyde in eggplant compared with 100% field capacity irrigation.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae0
Treatment
Reduced irrigatione1
Outcome
stress markers such as proline and malondialdehydee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
100% (control)e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine eggplant (Solanum melongena) introgression lines (ILs) covering altogether 71.6% of the genome of the donor wild relative parent S. incanum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–348 · show in text ↑
e1

“Reduced irrigation resulted in decreased growth and increased levels of stress markers such as proline and malondialdehyde”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–715 · show in text ↑
e5

“Plants at the five true leaves stage were irrigated at either 100% (control) or 30% (water stress) field capacity for 14 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–542 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most eggplant introgression lines had lower growth and biomass production than the cultivated parent under both irrigation conditions.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae0
Material
ILse2
Outcome
growth and biomass productione2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
cultivated parente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine eggplant (Solanum melongena) introgression lines (ILs) covering altogether 71.6% of the genome of the donor wild relative parent S. incanum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–348 · show in text ↑
e2

“Most ILs had lower growth and biomass production than the cultivated parent under both conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–814 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild alleles for two genomic regions (dwt8 and dwr6%) conferred improved tolerance to water stress in eggplant.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae0
Material
wild allelese3
Gene
dwt8 and dwr6%e3
Outcome
tolerance to water stresse3
Direction
improvede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine eggplant (Solanum melongena) introgression lines (ILs) covering altogether 71.6% of the genome of the donor wild relative parent S. incanum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–348 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, the wild alleles for two genomic regions related to stem and root dry weight (dwt8 and dwr6%) conferred improved tolerance to water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–963 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several S. incanum alleles had a positive effect on leaf water content, water use efficiency and chlorophyll content in eggplant under drought conditions.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenae0
Material
S. incanum allelese4
Outcome
leaf water content (lwc12%), water use efficiency (wue1%) and chlorophyll content (chl2 and chl8%)e4
Direction
positive effecte4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nine eggplant (Solanum melongena) introgression lines (ILs) covering altogether 71.6% of the genome of the donor wild relative parent S. incanum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–348 · show in text ↑
e4

“In addition, several S. incanum alleles had a positive effect on important traits that may improve yield under drought conditions, such as leaf water content (lwc12%), water use efficiency (wue1%) and chlorophyll content (chl2 and chl8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1202 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: oxidative · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · growth · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.