Paper · 2016 · Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC)

Rooting response of Prunus domestica L. microshoots in the presence of phytoactive medium supplements

Alina Wiszniewska; Barbara Nowak; Anna Kołton; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
21
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The study aimed at evaluating the response of common plum (Prunus domestica L.) microshoots during in vitro rooting in the presence of two phytoactive medium supplements, i.e. a dialyzate of pineapple pulp and a conditioned medium containing green algae Desmodesmus subspicatus exudates. Rooting efficiency was evaluated after 4 weeks of culture. During the root induction phase the content of phenolic compounds in shoot bases was determined and anatomical studies were conducted. Medium supplements were analyzed for the content of carbohydrates and phenolic acids. Both supplements were efficient in rooting induction of shoots of a difficult-to-root cultivar ‘Węgierka Zwykła’. Medium supplementation allowed a significant reduction in the exogenous auxin content required for rooting. The highest rooting efficiencies on supplemented media were 28.9 and 27.8 %, in comparison with 33.3 % obtained in the control medium with doubled concentration of exogenous auxins. In the easy-to-root plum cultivar ‘Węgierka Dąbrowicka’ the rooting rate was slightly reduced in the presence of pineapple dialyzate, while in the presence of algal conditioned medium the rooting rate decreased substantially compared with the non-supplemented medium. Approximately 30 % of ‘Węgierka Dąbrowicka’ shoots rooted on supplemented auxin-free media. The content of phenolic compounds accumulated in shoot bases during the root induction stage reflected the differences in rooting ability between both plum cultivars, indicating potential stressful conditions of the culture generated by the presence of phytoactive natural supplements. Anatomical study allowed to recognize the mode of dedifferentiation leading to adventitious rhizogenesis in the common plum. The results are discussed in relation to the composition of medium supplements and their potential root-promoting activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pineapple dialyzate induced rooting in the difficult-to-root cultivar.

Taxon
common plume2
Material
‘Węgierka Zwykła’e0
Treatment
a dialyzate of pineapple pulpe1
Outcome
rooting inductione0
Direction
efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Both supplements were efficient in rooting induction of shoots of a difficult-to-root cultivar ‘Węgierka Zwykła’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–681 · show in text ↑
e1

“a dialyzate of pineapple pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–205 · show in text ↑
e2

“common plum (Prunus domestica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Algal conditioned medium induced rooting in the difficult-to-root cultivar.

Taxon
common plume2
Material
‘Węgierka Zwykła’e0
Treatment
a conditioned medium containing green algae Desmodesmus subspicatus exudatese1
Interactor
Desmodesmus subspicatusDesmodesmus subspicatuse1other
Outcome
rooting inductione0
Direction
efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Both supplements were efficient in rooting induction of shoots of a difficult-to-root cultivar ‘Węgierka Zwykła’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–681 · show in text ↑
e1

“a conditioned medium containing green algae Desmodesmus subspicatus exudates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–286 · show in text ↑
e2

“common plum (Prunus domestica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementation significantly reduced the exogenous auxin content needed for rooting.

Taxon
common plume1
Treatment
Medium supplementatione0
Outcome
exogenous auxin content required for rootinge0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Medium supplementation allowed a significant reduction in the exogenous auxin content required for rooting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–789 · show in text ↑
e1

“common plum (Prunus domestica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest rooting efficiency on one supplemented medium was 28.9%, versus 33.3% in the doubled-auxin control.

Taxon
common plume1
Treatment
supplemented mediae0
Outcome
rooting efficienciese0
Value
28.9e0
Qualifier
33.3 %e0
Comparator
control medium with doubled concentration of exogenous auxinse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The highest rooting efficiencies on supplemented media were 28.9 and 27.8 %, in comparison with 33.3 % obtained in the control medium with doubled concentration of exogenous auxins.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–971 · show in text ↑
e1

“common plum (Prunus domestica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest rooting efficiency on another supplemented medium was 27.8%, versus 33.3% in the doubled-auxin control.

Taxon
common plume1
Treatment
supplemented mediae0
Outcome
rooting efficienciese0
Value
27.8 %e0
Qualifier
33.3 %e0
Comparator
control medium with doubled concentration of exogenous auxinse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The highest rooting efficiencies on supplemented media were 28.9 and 27.8 %, in comparison with 33.3 % obtained in the control medium with doubled concentration of exogenous auxins.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–971 · show in text ↑
e1

“common plum (Prunus domestica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pineapple dialyzate slightly reduced rooting rate in the easy-to-root cultivar.

Material
‘Węgierka Dąbrowicka’e0
Treatment
pineapple dialyzatee0
Outcome
rooting ratee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
slightlye0
Comparator
non-supplemented mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the easy-to-root plum cultivar ‘Węgierka Dąbrowicka’ the rooting rate was slightly reduced in the presence of pineapple dialyzate, while in the presence of algal conditioned medium the rooting rate decreased substantially compared with the non-supplemented medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Algal conditioned medium substantially decreased rooting rate in the easy-to-root cultivar versus unsupplemented medium.

Material
‘Węgierka Dąbrowicka’e0
Treatment
algal conditioned mediume0
Outcome
rooting ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
substantiallye0
Comparator
non-supplemented mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the easy-to-root plum cultivar ‘Węgierka Dąbrowicka’ the rooting rate was slightly reduced in the presence of pineapple dialyzate, while in the presence of algal conditioned medium the rooting rate decreased substantially compared with the non-supplemented medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1239 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 30% of easy-to-root cultivar shoots rooted on supplemented auxin-free media.

Taxon
common plume1
Material
‘Węgierka Dąbrowicka’e0
Treatment
supplemented auxin-free mediae0
Outcome
shoots rootede0
Value
30 %e0

Verbatim

e0

“Approximately 30 % of ‘Węgierka Dąbrowicka’ shoots rooted on supplemented auxin-free media.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1331 · show in text ↑
e1

“common plum (Prunus domestica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 46–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenolic content in shoot bases reflected rooting differences between cultivars.

Organ / stage
shoot basese0
Outcome
differences in rooting abilitye0
Qualifier
content of phenolic compoundse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The content of phenolic compounds accumulated in shoot bases during the root induction stage reflected the differences in rooting ability between both plum cultivars, indicating potential stressful conditions of the culture generated by the presence of phytoactive natural supplements.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1617 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anatomical study identified a dedifferentiation mode leading to adventitious rhizogenesis.

Taxon
common plume0
Outcome
mode of dedifferentiation leading to adventitious rhizogenesise0

Verbatim

e0

“Anatomical study allowed to recognize the mode of dedifferentiation leading to adventitious rhizogenesis in the common plum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1742 · show in text ↑

in vitro · growth · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.