Paper · 2007

Basic Slag as a Liming Material to Ameliorate Soil Acidity in Alfisols of Sub-tropical India

Biswapati Mandal

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Crop production on acid soils can be improved greatly by adjusting the pH to near neutrality. While soil acidity is commonly corrected by calcite, there is evidence that use of basic slag as an amendment can increase the pH of acid soils. The effect of calcite and basic slag (CaSiO ) with different doses on soil acidity, 3 nutrient availability and grain yield was determined in the experiments. Fourteen field experiments were conducted during the rabi season of 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 in Alfisolsof Midnapur West and Purulia districts of West Bengal, INDIA. Besides liming materials, locally available organic resources e.g. farmyard manure (FYM) and poultry manure (PM) were also used along with basic slag to increase its efficacy. The treatments used were as follows: No lime, 1/5 LR (basic slag), 1/5 LR (calcite), 1/10 LR (basic slag), 1/10 LR (calcite), th th th th 1/5 LR (basic slag + FYM @ 5t/ha) and 1/5 LR (basic slag + PM @ 3t/ha). Results showed that both th th calcite and basic slag increased the grain yield of wheat. They were effective when applied @ 1/5 LR dose th than 1/10 LR. On an average, calcite and basic slag caused an increase in grain yield to the extent of 21.9 and th 31.0% over the no lime treatment, respectively. Results also showed that increase in the yield of wheat was more with basic slag 1/5 LR than with calcite. Incorporation of organic sources of nutrients particularly FYM and th PM caused a further increase in yield, the magnitude being 56.2 and 60.2% respectively over the no lim e treatment. Results of straw yield also showed the similar trend of change. Uptake of N and P by wheat plants showed that liming caused significant increases in their uptake. There was no significant increase in concentration of K with lime application. Organic matter addition enhanced the uptake of the nutrient elements viz., N, P and K. Results of the analysis of residual soil showed that total acidity, exchange acidity and hydrolytic acidity recorded a decrease upon liming.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcite increased wheat grain yield by 21.9% over no lime.

Treatment
calcitee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
21.9e0
Comparator
no lime treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“calcite and basic slag caused an increase in grain yield to the extent of 21.9 and th 31.0% over the no lime treatment, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1250 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basic slag increased wheat grain yield by 31.0% over no lime.

Treatment
basic slage0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
31.0%e0
Comparator
no lime treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“calcite and basic slag caused an increase in grain yield to the extent of 21.9 and th 31.0% over the no lime treatment, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1250 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both liming materials were more effective at 1/5 LR than 1/10 LR.

Treatment
1/5 LRe0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
effectivee0
Comparator
1/10 LRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They were effective when applied @ 1/5 LR dose th than 1/10 LR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“both th th calcite and basic slag increased the grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1/5 LR, basic slag produced higher wheat yield than calcite.

Treatment
basic slag 1/5 LRe0
Outcome
yield of wheate0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
calcitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in the yield of wheat was more with basic slag 1/5 LR than with calcite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding FYM to basic slag increased yield by 56.2% over no lime.

Treatment
FYMe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
56.2e0
Comparator
no lim e treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of organic sources of nutrients particularly FYM and th PM caused a further increase in yield, the magnitude being 56.2 and 60.2% respectively over the no lim e treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1543 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results also showed that increase in the yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding poultry manure to basic slag increased yield by 60.2% over no lime.

Treatment
PMe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
60.2%e0
Comparator
no lim e treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of organic sources of nutrients particularly FYM and th PM caused a further increase in yield, the magnitude being 56.2 and 60.2% respectively over the no lim e treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1543 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results also showed that increase in the yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1307 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw yield followed the grain-yield trend under amendment treatments.

Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
similar trend of changee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of straw yield also showed the similar trend of change.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1608 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results also showed that increase in the yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming significantly increased wheat nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
liminge0
Outcome
Uptake of Ne0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uptake of N and P by wheat plants showed that liming caused significant increases in their uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming significantly increased wheat phosphorus uptake.

Treatment
liminge0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uptake of N and P by wheat plants showed that liming caused significant increases in their uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming did not significantly increase wheat potassium concentration.

Treatment
lime applicatione0
Outcome
concentration of Ke0
Direction
no significant increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant increase in concentration of K with lime application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1786 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic matter addition enhanced uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium.

Treatment
Organic matter additione0
Outcome
uptake of the nutrient elements viz., N, P and Ke0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic matter addition enhanced the uptake of the nutrient elements viz., N, P and K.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1787–1873 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming decreased total, exchange and hydrolytic soil acidity.

Treatment
liminge0
Outcome
total acidity, exchange acidity and hydrolytic aciditye0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total acidity, exchange acidity and hydrolytic acidity recorded a decrease upon liming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1927–2013 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results also showed that increase in the yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1307 · show in text ↑

calcite · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

lime · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 46 positive, 9 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 79 positive, 10 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

lime · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.