Paper · 2006 · European Journal of Soil Science

Yield response of crops amended with sewage sludge in the field is more affected by sludge properties than by final soil metal concentration

K. De Brouwere; E. Smolders

13
claims
16
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Summary Adverse effects on crop yield or quality have been reported in sewage‐sludge treated soils at soil total metal concentrations below those of the current EU directives. A field trial was set up in Belgium (2002–2004) to assess crop response to the application of sewage sludge below these soil thresholds but with sludge metal concentrations either above (high‐metal) or below (low‐metal) sludge metal limits. Two lime‐stabilized and two raw, dewatered sludges were applied annually at rates of 10, 25 and 50 t dry matter (dm) ha −1 for 3 years with four rates of N‐fertilizer as a reference. Final soil metal concentrations increased to maximums of 1.6 mg Cd kg −1 and 225 mg Zn kg −1 through sludge applications. Maize yield was marginally affected by treatments in year 1, whereas wheat and barley grain yields in subsequent years increased up to threefold with increasing sludge or fertilizer rates and were mainly explained by grain‐N. However, the grain yield of winter wheat in year 2 was reduced by about 14% in lime‐stabilized high‐metal sludge treatments compared with wheat receiving N‐fertilizer at equivalent grain‐N. Wheat grain and straw analysis showed no nutrient deficiencies but Zn concentrations in grain and straw were greater than in N‐fertilizer and lime‐stabilized, low‐metal sludge treatments, suggesting Zn toxicity. Sludge properties other than Cd concentration (e.g. electrical conductivity) affected crop Cd in the first year (maize), whereas significant correlations between Cd application and wheat grain Cd were found in the second year. Wheat grain Cd concentrations reached the international trade guideline of 0.1 mg Cd kg −1 fresh weight in the plots amended with lime‐treated, high‐metal sludge even though soil Cd remained below EU limits. In the third year, barley grain Cd remained largely below EU limits. We discuss the possibility that sludge properties rather than soil total metal concentrations are related to effects on crops in the initial years after sludge applications. In none of the 3 years were any adverse effects on crops found for sludge meeting current EU regulations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge application increased final soil Cd and Zn concentrations to reported maxima.

Outcome
soil metal concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.6 mg Cd kg −1 and 225 mg Zn kg −1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Final soil metal concentrations increased to maximums of 1.6 mg Cd kg −1 and 225 mg Zn kg −1 through sludge applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–721 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield was marginally affected by treatments in year one.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
marginally affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize yield was marginally affected by treatments in year 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–781 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield increased up to threefold with increasing sludge or fertilizer rates.

Treatment
increasing sludge or fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
threefolde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat and barley grain yields in subsequent years increased up to threefold with increasing sludge or fertilizer rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–909 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley grain yield increased up to threefold with increasing sludge or fertilizer rates.

Treatment
increasing sludge or fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
threefolde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat and barley grain yields in subsequent years increased up to threefold with increasing sludge or fertilizer rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–909 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain nitrogen mainly explained the yield increases.

Compound
grain‐Ne0
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
explainede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were mainly explained by grain‐N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–946 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat and barley grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime-stabilized high-metal sludge reduced winter wheat grain yield by about 14% relative to equivalent grain-N fertilizer.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
lime‐stabilized high‐metal sludge treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 14%e0
Comparator
wheat receiving N‐fertilizer at equivalent grain‐Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield of winter wheat in year 2 was reduced by about 14% in lime‐stabilized high‐metal sludge treatments compared with wheat receiving N‐fertilizer at equivalent grain‐N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain and straw showed no nutrient deficiencies.

Organ / stage
grain and strawe0
Outcome
nutrient deficienciese0
Direction
noe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat grain and straw analysis showed no nutrient deficiencies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain and straw Zn concentrations exceeded those under N fertilizer and low-metal sludge.

Treatment
lime‐stabilized high‐metal sludge treatmentse2
Outcome
Zn concentrations in grain and strawe0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
suggesting Zn toxicitye0
Comparator
N‐fertilizer and lime‐stabilized, low‐metal sludge treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn concentrations in grain and straw were greater than in N‐fertilizer and lime‐stabilized, low‐metal sludge treatments, suggesting Zn toxicity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1349 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat grain and straw analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1168 · show in text ↑
e2

“lime‐stabilized high‐metal sludge treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1071 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge properties other than Cd concentration affected first-year maize Cd.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Sludge properties other than Cd concentratione0
Outcome
crop Cde0
Direction
affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sludge properties other than Cd concentration (e.g. electrical conductivity) affected crop Cd in the first year (maize)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1469 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd application correlated significantly with wheat grain Cd in the second year.

Treatment
Cd applicatione0
Outcome
grain Cde0
Direction
correlationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant correlations between Cd application and wheat grain Cd were found in the second year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1576 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain Cd reached 0.1 mg Cd kg −1 fresh weight under lime-treated high-metal sludge while soil Cd remained below EU limits.

Treatment
lime‐treated, high‐metal sludgee0
Outcome
grain Cd concentrationse0
Direction
reachede0
Value
0.1 mg Cd kg −1 fresh weighte0
Qualifier
soil Cd remained below EU limitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat grain Cd concentrations reached the international trade guideline of 0.1 mg Cd kg −1 fresh weight in the plots amended with lime‐treated, high‐metal sludge even though soil Cd remained below EU limits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1784 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Third-year barley grain Cd remained largely below EU limits.

Outcome
grain Cde0
Direction
belowe0
Qualifier
third yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the third year, barley grain Cd remained largely below EU limits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1853 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge meeting current EU regulations caused no adverse crop effects over three years.

Taxon
cropse0
Treatment
sludge meeting current EU regulationse0
Outcome
adverse effectse0
Direction
nonee0

Verbatim

e0

“In none of the 3 years were any adverse effects on crops found for sludge meeting current EU regulations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2028–2133 · show in text ↑

lime · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 46 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 79 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 140 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 281 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.