Abstract
The study was initiated to determine the influence of VAM fungi on a Rhizobiumlegume interaction in the green house condition. The pot experiment was conducted during rabi season with Annigeri-1 seed variety of Cicer arietinum.L. The different inoculations (single and dual) of Rhizobium and Glomus fasciculatum were incorporated. During the period of experiment samples were analysed for nodule numbers, dry weight of nodules, grain yields, phosphorus uptake and percent VAM infection. The results revealed that dual inoculation of Rhizobium with Glomus fasciculatum enhanced seed yield of chickpea.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 1
Claim · model-written summary
Dual inoculation with Rhizobium and Glomus fasciculatum enhanced chickpea seed yield.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- dual inoculation of Rhizobium with Glomus fasciculatume0
- Second interactor
- Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The results revealed that dual inoculation of Rhizobium with Glomus fasciculatum enhanced seed yield of chickpea”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
116 papers more in this group
See all 120 papers →Rhizophagus fasciculatus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
213 papers more in this group
See all 217 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.