Paper · 2012

The Synergistic Effect Of VAM Fungi With Rhizobium On The Growth And Yield Of Cicer Arietinum.L

H K Makari

1
claims
1
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The study was initiated to determine the influence of VAM fungi on a Rhizobiumlegume interaction in the green house condition. The pot experiment was conducted during rabi season with Annigeri-1 seed variety of Cicer arietinum.L. The different inoculations (single and dual) of Rhizobium and Glomus fasciculatum were incorporated. During the period of experiment samples were analysed for nodule numbers, dry weight of nodules, grain yields, phosphorus uptake and percent VAM infection. The results revealed that dual inoculation of Rhizobium with Glomus fasciculatum enhanced seed yield of chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation with Rhizobium and Glomus fasciculatum enhanced chickpea seed yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
dual inoculation of Rhizobium with Glomus fasciculatume0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that dual inoculation of Rhizobium with Glomus fasciculatum enhanced seed yield of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–599 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

Rhizophagus fasciculatus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.