Abstract
This study was conducted to determine to find out how long the grapevine cuttings of rootstock 41B should be submerged in order to increase adventitious root formation. The cuttings were placed in a big container filled with tap water in an order of 72, 48, 24 and 12 hours. Data obtained showed that generally water soaking increases rooting of the cuttings. Auxin applied afterwards also has a positive effect on inducing rooting. Keeping the cuttings submerged in water at least 24 hours and applying IBA afterwards resulted in the best results. Water soaking and/or IBA, however, did not improve the top growth of the cuttings.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Water soaking of grapevine cuttings increased rooting.
VitisNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Data obtained showed that generally water soaking increases rooting of the cuttings”
t0“grapevine cuttings of rootstock 41B”
Claim · model-written summary
Auxin applied after soaking had a positive effect on inducing rooting of grapevine cuttings.
- Material
- rootstock 41Bt0
- Treatment
- Auxin applied afterwardse2
- Outcome
- inducing rootinge2
- Direction
- positive effecte2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Auxin applied afterwards also has a positive effect on inducing rooting”
t0“grapevine cuttings of rootstock 41B”
Claim · model-written summary
Submersion of cuttings in water for at least 24 hours followed by IBA gave the best results for grapevine cuttings.
- Material
- rootstock 41Bt0
- Treatment
- submerged in water at least 24 hours and applying IBA afterwardse3
- Outcome
- adventitious root formatione5
- Direction
- best resultse3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Keeping the cuttings submerged in water at least 24 hours and applying IBA afterwards resulted in the best results”
e5“This study was conducted to determine to find out how long the grapevine cuttings of rootstock 41B should be submerged in order to increase adventitious root formation”
t0“grapevine cuttings of rootstock 41B”
Claim · model-written summary
Water soaking and IBA did not improve the top growth of grapevine cuttings.
- Material
- rootstock 41Bt0
- Treatment
- Water soaking and/or IBAe4
- Outcome
- top growthe4
- Direction
- did not improvee4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Water soaking and/or IBA, however, did not improve the top growth of the cuttings”
t0“grapevine cuttings of rootstock 41B”
The same questions in other papers
indole-3-butyric acid · growth · VitisResults differ
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →flooding · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
class · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →application · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
42 papers more in this group
See all 46 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.