Paper · 2013 · Journal of Biopesticides

STUDY ON THE EFFICACY OF SOME ENTOMOGENOUS FUNGI AGAINST BROWN PLANT HOPPER, NILAPARVATA LUGENS STAL IN IRRIGATED RICE

A Venkat Reddy; R Sunitha Devi; S Dhurua; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT A field trial was conducted for three consecutive kharif seasons of 2010, 2011 and 2012 to study the efficacy of certain entomopathogenic fungi viz., Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae , Verticilium lecani @ 5 g/l having 1x108 CFU along with standard check - Acephate 75% SP @ 1.5 g/l against brown plant hopper, Nilaparvata lugen Stal and predators (mirid bugs and spiders). The results clearly indicated that Acephate 75 SP @ 1.5g/l was highly effective against BPH, but highly toxic to predators with higher grain yield and higher benefit cost ratio. However, B. bassiana, and M. anisopliae @ 5 g/l though found to be ineffective at 5 days after first spray, their efficacy against BPH increased with increase in days after spray and found to be at par with Acephate at 10 days after second spray. Among the entomopathogens, B. bassiana, and M. anisopliae were found to be relatively more effective against BPH and relatively less toxic to predators, followed by V. lecani.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acephate was highly effective against brown planthopper.

Treatment
Acephate 75 SP @ 1.5g/le0
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Outcome
BPHe0
Direction
highly effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results clearly indicated that Acephate 75 SP @ 1.5g/l was highly effective against BPH, but highly toxic to predators with higher grain yield and higher benefit cost ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–570 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acephate was highly toxic to predators.

Treatment
Acephate 75 SP @ 1.5g/le0
Interactor
predatorse0other
Outcome
predatorse0
Direction
highly toxice0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results clearly indicated that Acephate 75 SP @ 1.5g/l was highly effective against BPH, but highly toxic to predators with higher grain yield and higher benefit cost ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–570 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acephate produced higher grain yield.

Treatment
Acephate 75 SP @ 1.5g/le0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results clearly indicated that Acephate 75 SP @ 1.5g/l was highly effective against BPH, but highly toxic to predators with higher grain yield and higher benefit cost ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–570 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acephate produced a higher benefit cost ratio.

Treatment
Acephate 75 SP @ 1.5g/le0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results clearly indicated that Acephate 75 SP @ 1.5g/l was highly effective against BPH, but highly toxic to predators with higher grain yield and higher benefit cost ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–570 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana efficacy against BPH increased with time after spraying and matched Acephate ten days after the second spray.

Treatment
B. bassianae0
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Second interactor
B. bassianaBeauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
efficacy against BPHe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at 10 days after second spraye0
Comparator
Acephatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, B. bassiana, and M. anisopliae @ 5 g/l though found to be ineffective at 5 days after first spray, their efficacy against BPH increased with increase in days after spray and found to be at par with Acephate at 10 days after second spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metarhizium anisopliae efficacy against BPH increased with time after spraying and matched Acephate ten days after the second spray.

Treatment
M. anisopliae @ 5 g/le0
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Second interactor
M. anisopliaeMetarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
efficacy against BPHe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at 10 days after second spraye0
Comparator
Acephatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, B. bassiana, and M. anisopliae @ 5 g/l though found to be ineffective at 5 days after first spray, their efficacy against BPH increased with increase in days after spray and found to be at par with Acephate at 10 days after second spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana was relatively more effective against BPH and less toxic to predators than Verticilium lecani.

Treatment
B. bassianae0
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Second interactor
B. bassianaBeauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
effective against BPHe0
Direction
relatively more effectivee0
Comparator
V. lecanie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the entomopathogens, B. bassiana, and M. anisopliae were found to be relatively more effective against BPH and relatively less toxic to predators, followed by V. lecani.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metarhizium anisopliae was relatively more effective against BPH than Verticilium lecani.

Treatment
M. anisopliaee0
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Second interactor
M. anisopliaeMetarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
effective against BPHe0
Direction
relatively more effectivee0
Comparator
V. lecanie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the entomopathogens, B. bassiana, and M. anisopliae were found to be relatively more effective against BPH and relatively less toxic to predators, followed by V. lecani.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–118 · show in text ↑

Beauveria bassiana · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

acephate · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.