Paper · 2009 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Water Productivity of Winter Wheat in Different Irrigation/ Planting Methods using Saline Irrigation Water

Ehsan Ghane; Mohammad Ali Hosseinpour Feizi; B. Mostafazadeh‐Fard; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted to optimize an irrigation/planting method for higher wheat yield and water productivity (WP). The experiment comprised planting winter wheat with three irrigation water salinities as main plots, including: 4, 8 and 12 dS m -1 . Three irrigation/planting methods as sub-plots, namely: furrow irrigated raised wavy beds with 60 cm (FIRWB60) and 80 cm (FIRWB80) furrow to furrow width and conventional flat planting (FP). Finally, two irrigation depths as sub-sub plots, embodies 0.9 and 1.1 times the evapotranspiration. Results indicated that FIRWB60 had lower soil salinity than FP in the topsoil. As a result, wheat yield components (1000-grain weight, spike length & grain yield) enhanced. When irrigated with the saline irrigation water of 8 and 12 dS m -1 the FIRWB60 method produced higher grain yield with less irrigation, so WP increased by, respectively, 14.9 and 18.4% in comparison with the FP method. Based on the low water consumption, and high grain yield and WP of FIRWB60, it could be concluded that FIRWB60 is a suitable irrigation/planting method for providing sustainable agriculture in salt prone regions with water shortages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FIRWB60 had less topsoil salinity than flat planting.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
topsoile0
Treatment
FIRWB60e0
Outcome
soil salinitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
FPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FIRWB60 had lower soil salinity than FP in the topsoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FIRWB60 enhanced wheat 1000-grain weight, spike length and grain yield.

Treatment
FIRWB60e1
Outcome
1000-grain weight, spike length & grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat yield components (1000-grain weight, spike length & grain yield) enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“FIRWB60 had lower soil salinity than FP in the topsoil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 8 dS m -1 salinity, FIRWB60 raised water productivity by 14.9% versus flat planting.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
FIRWB60e1
Outcome
WPe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.9e0
Qualifier
8 and 12 dS m -1e1
Comparator
FP methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WP increased by, respectively, 14.9 and 18.4% in comparison with the FP method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“When irrigated with the saline irrigation water of 8 and 12 dS m -1 the FIRWB60 method produced higher grain yield with less irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 12 dS m -1 salinity, FIRWB60 raised water productivity by 18.4% versus flat planting.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
FIRWB60e1
Outcome
WPe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.4%e0
Comparator
FP methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WP increased by, respectively, 14.9 and 18.4% in comparison with the FP method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“When irrigated with the saline irrigation water of 8 and 12 dS m -1 the FIRWB60 method produced higher grain yield with less irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–855 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

FIRWB60 is recommended for saline, water-short regions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
FIRWB60e0
Outcome
suitable irrigation/planting methode0
Setting
salt prone regions with water shortagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FIRWB60 is a suitable irrigation/planting method for providing sustainable agriculture in salt prone regions with water shortages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–34 · show in text ↑

irrigation · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 8 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    FIRWB60 had less surface soil salinity than flat planting.

    Effect of Water Quality and Different Planting Methods on Wheat Yield · 2011 · compared with conventional flat planting (FP)

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.