Abstract
In order to evaluate the effects of dual inoculation of Azotobacter and Mycorrhiza with nitrogen and phosphorus levels on some traits of spring safflower, this study was carried out in the form of factorial in a randomized complete block design with three replications in experimental field of Farahan University in Markazi province of Iran during spring seasons of 2006 and 2007 years. Inoculation of Azotobacter (with and without inoculation: A , A ) and Mycorrhiza (with and without inoculation: M , M ) with nitrogen and phosphorus 01 0 1 levels (F = N + P (kg ha ), F1= N + P (kg ha ), F = N + P (kg ha ) and F = N + P (kg ha )) have been 0 0 0 50 25 2 100 50 3 150 75 111 1 studied. Results indicated that treatment Y A M F with oil yield (426.8 kg ha ) and treatment Y A M F with 2 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 1 oil yield (218 kg ha ) were significantly superior to the other treatments and according to calculated, 1 inoculation seeds in planting date with Azotobacter and Mycorrhiza to cause increase oil yield about 3.84 percent in compare with control treatment. Results from the present study indicated that grain yield and yield components of safflower have been affected significantly by the inoculation with Azotobacter and Mycorrhiza, because these bio-fertilizers can fix the atmospheric nitrogen and increase phosphorus availability in soil and enhance absorb elements by plant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
One treatment yielded 426.8 kg ha of safflower oil and was reported superior.
- Taxon
- Safflower
Carthamus tinctoriust0 - Treatment
- Y A M Fe0
- Outcome
- oil yielde0
- Value
- 426.8 kg hae0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment Y A M F with oil yield (426.8 kg ha )”
t0“Spring Safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Another treatment yielded 218 kg ha of safflower oil.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Outcome
- oil yielde0
- Value
- 218 kg hae0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“oil yield (218 kg ha )”
t0“Spring Safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter and Mycorrhiza seed inoculation increased safflower oil yield about 3.84 percent versus control.
- Taxon
- SafflowerCarthamus tinctoriust0
- Treatment
- inoculation seeds in planting date with Azotobacter and Mycorrhizae0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Second interactor
- Mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Outcome
- oil yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 3.84 percente0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“inoculation seeds in planting date with Azotobacter and Mycorrhiza to cause increase oil yield about 3.84 percent in compare with control treatment”
t0“Spring Safflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter and Mycorrhiza inoculation significantly affected safflower grain yield and yield components.
- Taxon
- safflowerCarthamus tinctoriuse0
- Treatment
- inoculation with Azotobacter and Mycorrhizae0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Outcome
- grain yield and yield componentse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grain yield and yield components of safflower have been affected significantly by the inoculation with Azotobacter and Mycorrhiza”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · quality: oil · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →sowing time · quality: oil · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.