Paper · 2020 · Journal of Crop production and processing

The Response of Morphology, Yield and Yield Components of Spring Safflower Genotypes to Different Sowing Dates

Aboodeh, H.; Moradi Telavat, M .R.; Moshattati, A.; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

In order to study the response of morphology, yield and yield components of spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) cultivars to different sowing dates, an experiment was carried out using a split-plot design on the basis of a randomized complete block design with four replications, in Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khouzestan, south-west of Iran at 2016-2017. Experimental factors were four sowing dates (11 November, 2 December, 5 January and 3 February) in main plots and five safflower cultivars (Sina, Goldasht, Soffeh, local Esfahan (Kooseh) and Faraman) in sub plots. The analysis of variance showed that the interaction effect of sowing date and cultivar was significant on all measured traits except plant height and grain oil percent. The mean comparisons showed that the highest grain yield (3722 kg/ha) and oil yield (837 kg/ha) were produced in sowing date of 11 November by Goldasht cultivar, and the lowest grain yield (351 kg/ha) and oil yield (71 kg/ha) were observed in sowing date of 3 February by Faraman cultivar. The highest amount of measured traits were achieved in the first sowing date (November 11) and delays in sowing date and, hence, occurrence of a terminal heat stress in flowering and grain filling phase decreased the grain yield and oil yield

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of sowing date and cultivar was significant for all measured traits except plant height and grain oil percent

Outcome
all measured traitse4
Qualifier
except plant height and grain oil percente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) cultivars to different sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–155 · show in text ↑
e4

“The analysis of variance showed that the interaction effect of sowing date and cultivar was significant on all measured traits except plant height and grain oil percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–776 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goldasht gave the highest grain yield, 3722 kg/ha, at the 11 November sowing date

Material
Goldashte1
Treatment
sowing date of 11 Novembere1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
3722 kg/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) cultivars to different sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–155 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mean comparisons showed that the highest grain yield (3722 kg/ha) and oil yield (837 kg/ha) were produced in sowing date of 11 November by Goldasht cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–938 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goldasht gave the highest oil yield, 837 kg/ha, at the 11 November sowing date

Material
Goldashte1
Treatment
sowing date of 11 Novembere1
Outcome
oil yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
837 kg/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) cultivars to different sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–155 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mean comparisons showed that the highest grain yield (3722 kg/ha) and oil yield (837 kg/ha) were produced in sowing date of 11 November by Goldasht cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–938 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faraman gave the lowest grain yield, 351 kg/ha, at the 3 February sowing date

Material
Faramane2
Treatment
sowing date of 3 Februarye2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
loweste2
Value
351 kg/hae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) cultivars to different sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–155 · show in text ↑
e2

“the lowest grain yield (351 kg/ha) and oil yield (71 kg/ha) were observed in sowing date of 3 February by Faraman cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1066 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faraman gave the lowest oil yield, 71 kg/ha, at the 3 February sowing date

Material
Faramane2
Treatment
sowing date of 3 Februarye2
Outcome
oil yielde2
Direction
loweste2
Value
71 kg/hae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) cultivars to different sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–155 · show in text ↑
e2

“the lowest grain yield (351 kg/ha) and oil yield (71 kg/ha) were observed in sowing date of 3 February by Faraman cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying sowing decreased grain yield and oil yield compared with the first sowing date

Treatment
delays in sowing datee3
Outcome
grain yield and oil yielde3
Direction
decreasede3
Comparator
first sowing datee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) cultivars to different sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–155 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest amount of measured traits were achieved in the first sowing date (November 11) and delays in sowing date and, hence, occurrence of a terminal heat stress in flowering and grain filling phase decreased the grain yield and oil yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1310 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Terminal heat stress in flowering and grain filling was given by the authors as the cause of the lower grain and oil yield after late sowing

Treatment
terminal heat stresse3
Outcome
grain yield and oil yielde3
Qualifier
terminal heat stress in flowering and grain filling phasee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) cultivars to different sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–155 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest amount of measured traits were achieved in the first sowing date (November 11) and delays in sowing date and, hence, occurrence of a terminal heat stress in flowering and grain filling phase decreased the grain yield and oil yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first sowing date gave the highest measured traits compared with delayed sowing

Treatment
first sowing date (November 11)e3
Outcome
measured traitse3
Direction
higheste3
Comparator
delays in sowing datee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) cultivars to different sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–155 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest amount of measured traits were achieved in the first sowing date (November 11) and delays in sowing date and, hence, occurrence of a terminal heat stress in flowering and grain filling phase decreased the grain yield and oil yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1310 · show in text ↑

sowing time · quality: oil · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.