Paper · 2008 · HortTechnology

Early Pruning Effects on ‘Florida-47’ and ‘Sungard’ Tomato

Bielinski M. Santos

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of early pruning on the growth and yield of ‘Florida-47’ and ‘Sungard’ tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) were assessed in west-central Florida. Each cultivar was established in separate experiments. The four pruning treatments consisted of leaving one, two, and three main stems in the tomato plants below the first flower cluster, and a nonpruned control. Pruning shoots had significant effects on the plant height of ‘Sungard’ and ‘Florida-47’ at 4 and 3 weeks after transplanting, respectively. Tomato plants with a single stem were 13% and 10% taller than the ones in the nonpruned control, respectively. However, this effect disappeared 1 and 2 weeks later in both cultivars. Regardless of the cultivar, early pruning did not influence foliar disease incidence or early and total tomato marketable yield. This cultural practice did not affect the partitioning to different fruit categories in either cultivars. This data showed that early pruning can temporarily change the plant architecture of ‘Sungard’ and ‘Florida-47’ tomato, explaining the perceived increased plant vigor in comparison with the nonpruned control. However, the effect disappeared during the growing season and did not reflect on marketable yields of either tomato cultivars. If no pruning were performed in these cultivars, growers would be able to save an estimated $40/acre of tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Single-stem Sungard tomato was 13% taller than unpruned plants four weeks after transplanting.

Material
Sungardt0
Treatment
single steme0
Outcome
tallere0
Direction
tallere0
Value
13%e0
Comparator
nonpruned controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants with a single stem were 13% and 10% taller than the ones in the nonpruned control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sungard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Single-stem Florida-47 tomato was 10% taller than unpruned plants three weeks after transplanting.

Material
Florida-47t0
Treatment
single steme0
Outcome
tallere0
Direction
tallere0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
nonpruned controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato plants with a single stem were 13% and 10% taller than the ones in the nonpruned control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Florida-47”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pruning-related height difference later disappeared in both tomato cultivars.

Treatment
early pruningt1
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
disappearede0
Qualifier
1 and 2 weeks latere0
Comparator
nonpruned controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this effect disappeared 1 and 2 weeks later in both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
t1

“Regardless of the cultivar, early pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–732 · show in text ↑
e1

“ones in the nonpruned control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early pruning did not influence tomato foliar disease incidence.

Treatment
early pruninge0
Outcome
foliar disease incidencee0
Direction
did not influencee0
Comparator
nonpruned controlt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early pruning did not influence foliar disease incidence or early and total tomato marketable yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“ones in the nonpruned control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early pruning did not influence early tomato marketable yield.

Treatment
early pruninge0
Outcome
early and total tomato marketable yielde0
Direction
did not influencee0
Comparator
nonpruned controlt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early pruning did not influence foliar disease incidence or early and total tomato marketable yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“ones in the nonpruned control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early pruning did not affect tomato fruit category partitioning.

Treatment
early pruningt1
Outcome
partitioning to different fruit categoriese0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
nonpruned controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This cultural practice did not affect the partitioning to different fruit categories in either cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
t1

“Regardless of the cultivar, early pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–732 · show in text ↑
e1

“ones in the nonpruned control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–603 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

No pruning was estimated to save growers $40/acre of tomato.

Outcome
savee0
Value
$40/acree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“If no pruning were performed in these cultivars, growers would be able to save an estimated $40/acre of tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1373 · show in text ↑

pruning · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 8 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Fruit pruning significantly increased tomato fruit cracking incidence.

    Cuticle cracking in tomato fruit · 1993 · compared with standard practice

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

pruning · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.