Abstract
Agriculture is inherently sensitive to weat her and climate. Adaptation of an appropriate management strategy is one of the likely decisions to cope with the impacts of changing climate. This study was designed to explore the role of arginine (0.0, 2.5 and 5.0 mM) in increasing the tolerance of wheat cultivar (Sakha-93) to two late sowing (23/12 and 23/1) dates, beside the normal sowing date (23/11) in Egypt. A field experiment was conducted in Agricultural Research Station of National Research Centre located in Shalkan Province, Kaluobia Governorate, Egypt. Delayed sowing caused marked reduction in biological and economic yield, through reduction in the spike length and weight, spike grain weight, spike no per square meter, and 1000-grains weight. The reduction in economic yield/fed reached to 10.39 and 41.22% when delay sowing wheat to 23/12 and 23/1 respectively. Foliar application of arginine with 2.5 and 5.0 mM on normal or delayed sowing wheat exhibited significant increment in yield and its components in comparison to untreated plants. The magnitude of increments was much more pronounced in response to 2.5 mM of arginine which induce 19.23, 20.53 and 25.51% increases in economic yield per feddan at normally, 30 and 60 days delay, respectively. As we ll as results show that, 2.5 mM arginine treatment induce 8.0% increase in grain yield over the plants sowing late at 23/12 and could reduce the reduction percent in grain yield from 41.22 to 26.22% at 23/1 sowing date. From this study it could be concluded that arginine could alleviate the adverse impact of climate change by late sowing of wheat and reduce the expected reduction of economic yield in semi-arid regions under irrigated agriculture.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing on 23/12 reduced wheat economic yield by 10.39%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- 23/12e0
- Outcome
- economic yield/fede0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 10.39e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The reduction in economic yield/fed reached to 10.39 and 41.22% when delay sowing wheat to 23/12 and 23/1 respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing on 23/1 reduced wheat economic yield by 41.22%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- 23/1e0
- Outcome
- economic yield/fede0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 41.22%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The reduction in economic yield/fed reached to 10.39 and 41.22% when delay sowing wheat to 23/12 and 23/1 respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar arginine at 2.5 or 5.0 mM significantly increased wheat yield and its components compared with untreated plants.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- Foliar application of arginine with 2.5 and 5.0 mMe0
- Outcome
- yield and its componentse0
- Direction
- incremente0
- Comparator
- untreated plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of arginine with 2.5 and 5.0 mM on normal or delayed sowing wheat exhibited significant increment in yield and its components in comparison to untreated plants”
Claim · model-written summary
At normal sowing, 2.5 mM arginine increased wheat economic yield by 19.23%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 2.5 mM of argininee0
- Outcome
- economic yield per feddane0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 19.23e0
- Qualifier
- normallye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“2.5 mM of arginine which induce 19.23, 20.53 and 25.51% increases in economic yield per feddan at normally, 30 and 60 days delay, respectively”
t0“wheat productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
At 30 days delayed sowing, 2.5 mM arginine increased wheat economic yield by 20.53%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 2.5 mM of argininee0
- Outcome
- economic yield per feddane0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 20.53e0
- Qualifier
- 30e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“2.5 mM of arginine which induce 19.23, 20.53 and 25.51% increases in economic yield per feddan at normally, 30 and 60 days delay, respectively”
t0“wheat productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
At 60 days delayed sowing, 2.5 mM arginine increased wheat economic yield by 25.51%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 2.5 mM of argininee0
- Outcome
- economic yield per feddane0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 25.51%e0
- Qualifier
- 60 days delaye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“2.5 mM of arginine which induce 19.23, 20.53 and 25.51% increases in economic yield per feddan at normally, 30 and 60 days delay, respectively”
t0“wheat productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
At 23/12 sowing, 2.5 mM arginine increased grain yield by 8.0%.
- Treatment
- 2.5 mM arginine treatmente0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 8.0%e0
- Comparator
- plants sowing late at 23/12e0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“2.5 mM arginine treatment induce 8.0% increase in grain yield over the plants sowing late at 23/12”
Claim · model-written summary
At 23/1 sowing, 2.5 mM arginine reduced the grain-yield loss from 41.22 to 26.22%.
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“could reduce the reduction percent in grain yield from 41.22 to 26.22% at 23/1 sowing date”
The same questions in other papers
arginine · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.