Paper · 2010

Alleviation of the potential impact of climate change on wheat productivity using arginine under irrigated Egyptian agriculture.

M. Hozayn; A. A. A. El-Monem

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Agriculture is inherently sensitive to weat her and climate. Adaptation of an appropriate management strategy is one of the likely decisions to cope with the impacts of changing climate. This study was designed to explore the role of arginine (0.0, 2.5 and 5.0 mM) in increasing the tolerance of wheat cultivar (Sakha-93) to two late sowing (23/12 and 23/1) dates, beside the normal sowing date (23/11) in Egypt. A field experiment was conducted in Agricultural Research Station of National Research Centre located in Shalkan Province, Kaluobia Governorate, Egypt. Delayed sowing caused marked reduction in biological and economic yield, through reduction in the spike length and weight, spike grain weight, spike no per square meter, and 1000-grains weight. The reduction in economic yield/fed reached to 10.39 and 41.22% when delay sowing wheat to 23/12 and 23/1 respectively. Foliar application of arginine with 2.5 and 5.0 mM on normal or delayed sowing wheat exhibited significant increment in yield and its components in comparison to untreated plants. The magnitude of increments was much more pronounced in response to 2.5 mM of arginine which induce 19.23, 20.53 and 25.51% increases in economic yield per feddan at normally, 30 and 60 days delay, respectively. As we ll as results show that, 2.5 mM arginine treatment induce 8.0% increase in grain yield over the plants sowing late at 23/12 and could reduce the reduction percent in grain yield from 41.22 to 26.22% at 23/1 sowing date. From this study it could be concluded that arginine could alleviate the adverse impact of climate change by late sowing of wheat and reduce the expected reduction of economic yield in semi-arid regions under irrigated agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing on 23/12 reduced wheat economic yield by 10.39%.

Treatment
23/12e0
Outcome
economic yield/fede0
Direction
reductione0
Value
10.39e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in economic yield/fed reached to 10.39 and 41.22% when delay sowing wheat to 23/12 and 23/1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing on 23/1 reduced wheat economic yield by 41.22%.

Treatment
23/1e0
Outcome
economic yield/fede0
Direction
reductione0
Value
41.22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in economic yield/fed reached to 10.39 and 41.22% when delay sowing wheat to 23/12 and 23/1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar arginine at 2.5 or 5.0 mM significantly increased wheat yield and its components compared with untreated plants.

Treatment
Foliar application of arginine with 2.5 and 5.0 mMe0
Outcome
yield and its componentse0
Direction
incremente0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of arginine with 2.5 and 5.0 mM on normal or delayed sowing wheat exhibited significant increment in yield and its components in comparison to untreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At normal sowing, 2.5 mM arginine increased wheat economic yield by 19.23%.

Treatment
2.5 mM of argininee0
Outcome
economic yield per feddane0
Direction
increasese0
Value
19.23e0
Qualifier
normallye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2.5 mM of arginine which induce 19.23, 20.53 and 25.51% increases in economic yield per feddan at normally, 30 and 60 days delay, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30 days delayed sowing, 2.5 mM arginine increased wheat economic yield by 20.53%.

Treatment
2.5 mM of argininee0
Outcome
economic yield per feddane0
Direction
increasese0
Value
20.53e0
Qualifier
30e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2.5 mM of arginine which induce 19.23, 20.53 and 25.51% increases in economic yield per feddan at normally, 30 and 60 days delay, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 days delayed sowing, 2.5 mM arginine increased wheat economic yield by 25.51%.

Treatment
2.5 mM of argininee0
Outcome
economic yield per feddane0
Direction
increasese0
Value
25.51%e0
Qualifier
60 days delaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2.5 mM of arginine which induce 19.23, 20.53 and 25.51% increases in economic yield per feddan at normally, 30 and 60 days delay, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 23/12 sowing, 2.5 mM arginine increased grain yield by 8.0%.

Treatment
2.5 mM arginine treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
8.0%e0
Comparator
plants sowing late at 23/12e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“2.5 mM arginine treatment induce 8.0% increase in grain yield over the plants sowing late at 23/12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 23/1 sowing, 2.5 mM arginine reduced the grain-yield loss from 41.22 to 26.22%.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducee0
Value
26.22%e0
Qualifier
23/1 sowing datee0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“could reduce the reduction percent in grain yield from 41.22 to 26.22% at 23/1 sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1495 · show in text ↑

arginine · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.