Paper · 1976 · Journal of Cell Science

The influence of gibberellic acid and abscisic acid on cell and tissue differentiation of bean callus

Lindsay Haddon; D. H. Northcote

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Bean callus was induced to form roots (tissue differentiation) and vascular nodules (cell differentiation) by lowering the ratio of auxin to cytokinin in the growth medium. Both types of differentiation were inhibited by the addition of abscisic acid (at concentrations greater than I muM) to induction medium. Initiation of differentiation was inhibited, but its subsequent development was not, and the inhibition was not affected by the addition of gibberellic acid. Addition of gibberellic acid (GA) alone to induction medium stimulated tissue differentiation, although cell differentiation was unaffected (30 muM GA) or inhibited (45 muM GA) and its onset was delayed at both concentrations. Root initiation was also stimulated by gibberellic acid (0.I-45 muM) at an auxin-to-kinin ratio 10 times that normally optimal for cell differentiation. The phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activity of the calluses was closely correlated with the amount of cell differentiation which had occurred, and measurement of this confirmed that gibberellic acid delayed the initiation of cell differentiation. The increase and subsequent decline of PAL and betaI leads to 3 glucan synthetase activities, normally induced by transfer to induction medium, was abolished by abscisic acid. Addition of gibberellic acid did not affect the betaI leads to 3 glucan synthetase activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lowering the auxin-to-cytokinin ratio induced roots in bean callus.

Taxon
Beane0
Organ / stage
calluse0
Treatment
lowering the ratio of auxin to cytokinine0
Outcome
roots (tissue differentiation)e0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“bean callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bean callus was induced to form roots (tissue differentiation) and vascular nodules (cell differentiation) by lowering the ratio of auxin to cytokinin in the growth medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lowering the auxin-to-cytokinin ratio induced vascular nodules in bean callus.

Taxon
Beane0
Organ / stage
calluse0
Treatment
lowering the ratio of auxin to cytokinine0
Outcome
vascular nodules (cell differentiation)e0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“bean callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bean callus was induced to form roots (tissue differentiation) and vascular nodules (cell differentiation) by lowering the ratio of auxin to cytokinin in the growth medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abscisic acid above I muM inhibited both differentiation types in bean callus.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
addition of abscisic acid (at concentrations greater than I muM)e0
Outcome
Both types of differentiatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“bean callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both types of differentiation were inhibited by the addition of abscisic acid (at concentrations greater than I muM) to induction medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abscisic acid inhibited initiation of differentiation but not later development.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
abscisic acide1
Outcome
Initiation of differentiatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“bean callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Initiation of differentiation was inhibited, but its subsequent development was not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both types of differentiation were inhibited by the addition of abscisic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellic acid did not alter abscisic-acid inhibition of differentiation.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
addition of gibberellic acide0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“bean callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“the inhibition was not affected by the addition of gibberellic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellic acid alone stimulated tissue differentiation.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
Addition of gibberellic acid (GA) alonee0
Outcome
tissue differentiatione0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“bean callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Addition of gibberellic acid (GA) alone to induction medium stimulated tissue differentiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30 muM GA, cell differentiation was unaffected.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
30 muM GAe0
Outcome
cell differentiatione0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“bean callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“cell differentiation was unaffected (30 muM GA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 45 muM GA, cell differentiation was inhibited.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
45 muM GAe0
Outcome
cell differentiatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“bean callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“cell differentiation was unaffected (30 muM GA) or inhibited (45 muM GA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA at both concentrations delayed onset of cell differentiation.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
gibberellic acide1
Outcome
onsete0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
both concentrationse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“bean callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“its onset was delayed at both concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–694 · show in text ↑
e1

“Addition of gibberellic acid (GA) alone to induction medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellic acid stimulated root initiation at a high auxin-to-kinin ratio.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
gibberellic acid (0.I-45 muM)e0
Outcome
Root initiatione0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
an auxin-to-kinin ratio 10 times that normally optimal for cell differentiatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“bean callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Root initiation was also stimulated by gibberellic acid (0.I-45 muM) at an auxin-to-kinin ratio 10 times that normally optimal for cell differentiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–847 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAL activity correlated closely with the amount of cell differentiation.

Taxon
beant0
Gene
phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL)e0
Outcome
amount of cell differentiatione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“bean callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“The phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activity of the calluses was closely correlated with the amount of cell differentiation which had occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abscisic acid abolished the normal rise and decline in PAL activity.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
abscisic acide0
Gene
PALe0
Outcome
increase and subsequent decline of PALe0
Direction
abolishede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“bean callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase and subsequent decline of PAL and betaI leads to 3 glucan synthetase activities, normally induced by transfer to induction medium, was abolished by abscisic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abscisic acid abolished the normal rise and decline in betaI leads to 3 glucan synthetase activity.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
abscisic acide0
Gene
betaI leads to 3 glucan synthetasee0
Outcome
betaI leads to 3 glucan synthetase activitiese0
Direction
abolishede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“bean callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase and subsequent decline of PAL and betaI leads to 3 glucan synthetase activities, normally induced by transfer to induction medium, was abolished by abscisic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellic acid did not affect betaI leads to 3 glucan synthetase activity.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
Addition of gibberellic acide0
Gene
betaI leads to 3 glucan synthetasee0
Outcome
betaI leads to 3 glucan synthetase activitye0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“bean callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Addition of gibberellic acid did not affect the betaI leads to 3 glucan synthetase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1366 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Gibberellic acid · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Gibberellic acid · physiology: enzyme activity · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

class · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.