Paper · 2012

Effects of Drought Stress and Different Nitrogen Levels on Morphological Traits of Proline in Leaf and Protein of Corn Seed (Zea mays L.)

Mohsen Tarighaleslami; Reza Zarghami; Masoud Mashhadi; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
39
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This experiment was set up to understand the mechanisms causing yield limitations on crops subjected to water deficiency. The units were set out as a randomized complete block design with a split-plot arrangement with 4 repetitions at Azad Islamic University Research Center-Varamin-Pishva during the growing seasons of 2008 and 2009. The main factors tested drought stress at four stages (50, 100, 150 and 200 mm evaporation from the evaporation pan) and the sub factors were applications of nitrogen fertilizer at 3 levels (80,130,180 kg/ha). The experiment demonstrated that with increasing severity of drought stress, grain yield decreased sharply but increased with nitrogen fertilizer, the time taken for pollination, grain weight and total number of grains/ear were also affected. Results for plant height and diameter of first internode and total number of leaves above the ear (201.8 cm) were most affected by nitrogen fertilizer application of 180 kg/ha and 50 mm evaporation. Proline also increased significantly under drought stress conditions showing that osmotic adjustment mechanism had been activated. The highest level of leaf proline (180.2 µmol/g NT) was achieved with 200 mm evaporation and 80 kg/ha of nitrogen fertilizer. Grain protein content was undesirably affected under extreme drought stress and fertilizer treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield fell sharply with increasing drought severity.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with increasing severity of drought stress, grain yield decreased sharply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Seed (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased with nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield decreased sharply but increased with nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Seed (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer and drought affected time to pollination, grain weight and grains per ear.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere1
Outcome
time taken for pollination, grain weight and total number of grains/eare0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the time taken for pollination, grain weight and total number of grains/ear were also affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–786 · show in text ↑
e1

“with increasing severity of drought stress, grain yield decreased sharply but increased with nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Seed (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, first internode diameter and leaves above the ear were most affected at 180 kg/ha nitrogen and 50 mm evaporation.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer application of 180 kg/ha and 50 mm evaporatione0
Outcome
plant height and diameter of first internode and total number of leaves above the eare0
Qualifier
201.8 cme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height and diameter of first internode and total number of leaves above the ear (201.8 cm) were most affected by nitrogen fertilizer application of 180 kg/ha and 50 mm evaporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Seed (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline increased significantly under drought stress.

Treatment
drought stress conditionse0
Outcome
Prolinee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline also increased significantly under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Seed (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest leaf proline was 180.2 µmol/g NT at 200 mm evaporation and 80 kg/ha nitrogen.

Treatment
200 mm evaporation and 80 kg/ha of nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
leaf prolinee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
180.2 µmol/g NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest level of leaf proline (180.2 µmol/g NT) was achieved with 200 mm evaporation and 80 kg/ha of nitrogen fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1243 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Seed (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extreme drought and fertilizer adversely affected grain protein content.

Treatment
extreme drought stress and fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
Grain protein contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain protein content was undesirably affected under extreme drought stress and fertilizer treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Seed (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–137 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

33 papers: 7 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

44 papers: 28 positive, 16 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 236 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 236 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

drought · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

353 papers: 53 positive, 300 negative or no effect

299 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

349 papers more in this group

See all 353 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.