Paper · 2012

Effect of the application of combined treatments of additives on the inhibition of enzymatic browning in minimally processed apples cv. Granny Smith

M. Ardanaz; C. González; Silvina Mabel Guidi

3
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Enzymatic browning, which is mainly catalyzed by the enzyme poliphenol oxidase (PPO), is one of the major problems affecting quality and limiting shelf life of fresh cut fruits and vegetables. Traditionally, sulfites are used to inhibit the enzyme. However, its presence in the food has induced allergenic reactions, particularly in asth­ matic persons. Consequently, it has been evaluated the effect of other PPO inhibitors in order to obtain fresh and natural products. In the present work, the evolution of PPO activity and the chromatic characteristics of the pulp were evaluated in cv. Granny Smith apple slices. The slices were submitted to three treatments: I. 2% as­ corbic acid + 1% citric acid + 0.5% EDTA; II. 1% ascorbic acid + 0.5% citric acid + 0.25% EDTA; and III. water, used as control. During the storage, parameters of the CIE L*a*b* color space of the slices were evaluated, indicating that both treatments containing additives were effective in preventing browning. The specific activity of PPO was determined spectrophotometrically in apple extracts obtained from each treatment. The results indicated that the stronger treatment (I) had induced the most effective inhibition of the enzyme. On view of the present results, It is proposed to evaluate the “in vitro” effectiveness of the inhibitors in order to compare these results with the ones obtained with apple slices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment I prevented browning of Granny Smith apple slices during storage.

Material
cv. Granny Smitht0
Treatment
2% as­ corbic acid + 1% citric acid + 0.5% EDTAe0
Outcome
browninge1
Direction
preventinge1
Comparator
watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples cv. Granny Smith”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“I. 2% as­ corbic acid + 1% citric acid + 0.5% EDTA; II. 1% ascorbic acid + 0.5% citric acid + 0.25% EDTA; and III. water, used as control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–803 · show in text ↑
e1

“both treatments containing additives were effective in preventing browning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment II prevented browning of Granny Smith apple slices during storage.

Material
cv. Granny Smitht0
Treatment
1% ascorbic acid + 0.5% citric acid + 0.25% EDTAe0
Outcome
browninge1
Direction
preventinge1
Comparator
watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples cv. Granny Smith”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“I. 2% as­ corbic acid + 1% citric acid + 0.5% EDTA; II. 1% ascorbic acid + 0.5% citric acid + 0.25% EDTA; and III. water, used as control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–803 · show in text ↑
e1

“both treatments containing additives were effective in preventing browning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment I most effectively inhibited PPO activity in apple slices.

Material
cv. Granny Smitht0
Treatment
2% as­ corbic acid + 1% citric acid + 0.5% EDTAe0
Gene
PPOe2
Outcome
specific activity of PPOe2
Direction
most effective inhibitione1
Comparator
1% ascorbic acid + 0.5% citric acid + 0.25% EDTAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apples cv. Granny Smith”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“I. 2% as­ corbic acid + 1% citric acid + 0.5% EDTA; II. 1% ascorbic acid + 0.5% citric acid + 0.25% EDTA; and III. water, used as control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–803 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results indicated that the stronger treatment (I) had induced the most effective inhibition of the enzyme.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1212 · show in text ↑
e2

“The specific activity of PPO was determined spectrophotometrically”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1053 · show in text ↑

citric acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

citric acid · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

ascorbic acid · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.