Paper · 2010 · Journal of agricultural and biological science

USE OF SELECTED PLANT-DERIVED POWDERS AND THEIR COMBINATIONS TO PROTECT STORED COWPEA GRAINS AGAINST DAMAGE BY Callosobruchus maculatus

Nelson Neba Ntonifor; Esther Obi Oben; Christina B. Konje

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In search for low-cost plant-based post-harvest insecticides against stored product insects, dried seed powders of Syzygium aromaticum, Piper guineense, Ocimum basilicum, Aframomum citratrum and leaf powders of Cyperus aequalis and Eucalyptus camaldulensis were tested against Callosobruchus maculatus in cowpea grains. For each, 100g of grains were mixed with 1, 2, 3, or 4g of powder and mortality recorded daily for 5 days. The potency and persistence of various combinations of potent powders were also studied. Regardless of concentration, S. aromaticum or P. guineense powder treated grains caused 100% and 98.75% adult mortality, respectively, within 5 days after infestation (DAI) compared to 100% 2 DAI for Actellic powder, the standard protectant in Cameroon. Ocimum basilicum or A. citratum powder were less efficacious compared to S. aromaticum and P. guineense; each caused significantly lower grain weight loss after three months of storage. S. aromaticum powders had longer residual effects by preventing weevil emergence for ≥ 8 weeks compared to 6 weeks for P. guineense. Adult weevils introduced weekly on seeds treated with S. aromaticum powder were continuously killed for ≥ 8 weeks after treatment compared to 6 and 4 weeks for P. guineense and Actellic, respectively. Application of 50:50% combinations of S. aromaticum and C. aequalis powders caused 100% adult mortality at 5 DAI, earlier than similar mixtures with E. camaldulensis or P. guineense and C. aequalis or E. camaldulensis. Equal mixtures of powders of S. aromaticum and C. aequalis clearly have potentials for long-term and large-scale protection of stored grains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains treated with S. aromaticum powder caused 100% adult mortality within 5 days after infestation, regardless of concentration, compared with Actellic powder.

Organ / stage
grainse1
Treatment
S. aromaticume1
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatust0pest
Outcome
adult mortalitye1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
100%e1
Qualifier
within 5 days after infestatione1
Comparator
Actellic powdere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“STORED COWPEA GRAINS AGAINST DAMAGE BY Callosobruchus maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regardless of concentration, S. aromaticum or P. guineense powder treated grains caused 100% and 98.75% adult mortality, respectively, within 5 days after infestation (DAI) compared to 100% 2 DAI for Actellic powder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains treated with P. guineense powder caused 98.75% adult mortality within 5 days after infestation, compared with Actellic powder.

Organ / stage
grainse1
Treatment
P. guineensee1
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatust0pest
Outcome
adult mortalitye1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
98.75%e1
Qualifier
within 5 days after infestatione1
Comparator
Actellic powdere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“STORED COWPEA GRAINS AGAINST DAMAGE BY Callosobruchus maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regardless of concentration, S. aromaticum or P. guineense powder treated grains caused 100% and 98.75% adult mortality, respectively, within 5 days after infestation (DAI) compared to 100% 2 DAI for Actellic powder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ocimum basilicum or A. citratum powder caused significantly lower grain weight loss after three months of storage.

Treatment
Ocimum basilicum or A. citratum powdere2
Outcome
grain weight losse2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
after three months of storagee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“STORED COWPEA GRAINS AGAINST DAMAGE BY Callosobruchus maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ocimum basilicum or A. citratum powder were less efficacious compared to S. aromaticum and P. guineense; each caused significantly lower grain weight loss after three months of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ocimum basilicum or A. citratum powder was less efficacious than S. aromaticum and P. guineense powders.

Treatment
Ocimum basilicum or A. citratum powdere2
Outcome
efficaciouse2
Direction
lesse2
Comparator
S. aromaticum and P. guineensee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“STORED COWPEA GRAINS AGAINST DAMAGE BY Callosobruchus maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–135 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ocimum basilicum or A. citratum powder were less efficacious compared to S. aromaticum and P. guineense; each caused significantly lower grain weight loss after three months of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. aromaticum powder prevented weevil emergence for 8 weeks or more, longer than P. guineense powder (6 weeks).

Treatment
S. aromaticume3
Interactor
weevile3pest
Outcome
residual effectse3
Direction
longere3
Value
≥ 8 weekse3
Qualifier
6 weekse3
Comparator
P. guineensee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“STORED COWPEA GRAINS AGAINST DAMAGE BY Callosobruchus maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–135 · show in text ↑
e3

“S. aromaticum powders had longer residual effects by preventing weevil emergence for ≥ 8 weeks compared to 6 weeks for P. guineense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adult weevils introduced weekly on S. aromaticum powder-treated seeds were continuously killed for 8 weeks or more, longer than on P. guineense or Actellic treatments.

Treatment
S. aromaticum powdere4
Interactor
weevilsCurculionidaee4pest
Outcome
continuously killede4
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Value
≥ 8 weekse4
Comparator
P. guineense and Actellice4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“STORED COWPEA GRAINS AGAINST DAMAGE BY Callosobruchus maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–135 · show in text ↑
e4

“Adult weevils introduced weekly on seeds treated with S. aromaticum powder were continuously killed for ≥ 8 weeks after treatment compared to 6 and 4 weeks for P. guineense and Actellic, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50:50 mixture of S. aromaticum and C. aequalis powders caused 100% adult mortality at 5 DAI, earlier than similar mixtures with E. camaldulensis or P. guineense.

Treatment
combinations of S. aromaticum and C. aequalis powderse5
Outcome
adult mortalitye5
Direction
earliere5
Value
100%e5
Qualifier
at 5 DAIe5
Comparator
similar mixtures with E. camaldulensis or P. guineense and C. aequalis or E. camaldulensise5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“STORED COWPEA GRAINS AGAINST DAMAGE BY Callosobruchus maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–135 · show in text ↑
e5

“Application of 50:50% combinations of S. aromaticum and C. aequalis powders caused 100% adult mortality at 5 DAI, earlier than similar mixtures with E. camaldulensis or P. guineense and C. aequalis or E. camaldulensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1507 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Equal mixtures of S. aromaticum and C. aequalis powders are considered to have potential for long-term and large-scale protection of stored cowpea grains.

Outcome
protection of stored grainse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“STORED COWPEA GRAINS AGAINST DAMAGE BY Callosobruchus maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–135 · show in text ↑
e6

“Equal mixtures of powders of S. aromaticum and C. aequalis clearly have potentials for long-term and large-scale protection of stored grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1649 · show in text ↑

Piper guineense · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Syzygium aromaticum · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Syzygium aromaticum · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · quality: postharvest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

botanical · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 123 positive, 3 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

botanical · Curculionidae · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.