Paper · 2014

Phytoextraction of Pb and Cd; the effect of Urea and EDTA on Cannabis sativa growth under metals stress

Fazal Hadi; Fazal Hussain; Muhammad M. Hussain; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
23
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Contamination of soil with toxic heavy metals is a wide spread environmental problem. Heavy metals adversely affect plant growth, productivity and ultimately human health. A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of two different concentrations of urea (1500 and 2500 ppm) and single concentration of ethylenediaminetetra acetic acid (EDTA ) (100 ppm) on growth and metal (Pb and Cd) Phytoextraction potential of Cannabis sativa in metals polluted soil. The T2 (Urea 2500 ppm) showed highly significant increase in plant growth and dry biomass, followed by T1 (Urea 1500 ppm) on metals contaminated soil as compared to control (C1). Similarly T4 ( Urea 2500 ppm+ EDTA 100 ppm ) showed higher plant growth, biomass and highly enhanced the uptake of Pb and Cd in different parts of the plant than T3 ( Urea 1500 ppm + EDTA 100 ppm) in metal polluted soil, While T2 (Urea 2500 ppm) alone produced maximum plant growth and biomass than T1 (Urea 1500 ppm) when compared with C1.The application of EDTA alone (T5) (100 ppm EDTA ) increased the Pb and Cd uptake but declined plant growth and biomass which subsequently reduced the total phytoextraction of Pb and Cd. Conclusively,Plant growth and biomass really reduced in metal polluted soil but was increased in metals combination with urea .Addition of EDTA considerably enhanced metals (Pb and Cd) phytoaccumulation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea at 2500 ppm significantly increased plant growth and dry biomass versus control.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
Urea 2500 ppme0
Outcome
plant growth and dry biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control (C1)e0
Setting
metals contaminated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The T2 (Urea 2500 ppm) showed highly significant increase in plant growth and dry biomass, followed by T1 (Urea 1500 ppm) on metals contaminated soil as compared to control (C1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea at 1500 ppm ranked after 2500 ppm for growth and dry biomass relative to control.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
Urea 1500 ppme0
Outcome
plant growth and dry biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control (C1)e0
Setting
metals contaminated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The T2 (Urea 2500 ppm) showed highly significant increase in plant growth and dry biomass, followed by T1 (Urea 1500 ppm) on metals contaminated soil as compared to control (C1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea at 2500 ppm with EDTA gave higher growth and biomass than urea at 1500 ppm with EDTA.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
Urea 2500 ppm+ EDTA 100 ppme0
Outcome
plant growth, biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Urea 1500 ppm + EDTA 100 ppme0
Setting
metal polluted soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 ( Urea 2500 ppm+ EDTA 100 ppm ) showed higher plant growth, biomass and highly enhanced the uptake of Pb and Cd in different parts of the plant than T3 ( Urea 1500 ppm + EDTA 100 ppm) in metal polluted soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea at 2500 ppm with EDTA enhanced Pb uptake versus urea at 1500 ppm with EDTA.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Organ / stage
different parts of the plante0
Treatment
Urea 2500 ppm+ EDTA 100 ppme0
Outcome
uptake of Pbe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
Urea 1500 ppm + EDTA 100 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 ( Urea 2500 ppm+ EDTA 100 ppm ) showed higher plant growth, biomass and highly enhanced the uptake of Pb and Cd in different parts of the plant than T3 ( Urea 1500 ppm + EDTA 100 ppm) in metal polluted soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea at 2500 ppm with EDTA enhanced Cd uptake versus urea at 1500 ppm with EDTA.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Organ / stage
different parts of the plante0
Treatment
Urea 2500 ppm+ EDTA 100 ppme0
Outcome
uptake of Pb and Cde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
Urea 1500 ppm + EDTA 100 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 ( Urea 2500 ppm+ EDTA 100 ppm ) showed higher plant growth, biomass and highly enhanced the uptake of Pb and Cd in different parts of the plant than T3 ( Urea 1500 ppm + EDTA 100 ppm) in metal polluted soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea at 2500 ppm alone produced maximum growth and biomass versus the 1500 ppm treatment and control.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
Urea 2500 ppme0
Outcome
plant growth and biomasse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
Urea 1500 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T2 (Urea 2500 ppm) alone produced maximum plant growth and biomass than T1 (Urea 1500 ppm) when compared with C1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EDTA alone increased Pb and Cd uptake.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
100 ppm EDTAe0
Outcome
Pb and Cd uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of EDTA alone (T5) (100 ppm EDTA ) increased the Pb and Cd uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EDTA alone reduced plant growth and biomass.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
100 ppm EDTAe0
Outcome
plant growth and biomasse0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of EDTA alone (T5) (100 ppm EDTA ) increased the Pb and Cd uptake but declined plant growth and biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EDTA alone reduced total Pb and Cd phytoextraction following growth reduction.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
100 ppm EDTAe1
Outcome
total phytoextraction of Pb and Cde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“declined plant growth and biomass which subsequently reduced the total phytoextraction of Pb and Cd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1171 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of EDTA alone (T5) (100 ppm EDTA )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metal-polluted soil reduced plant growth and biomass.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Outcome
Plant growth and biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
metal polluted soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth and biomass really reduced in metal polluted soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea combined with metals increased plant growth and biomass.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
Plant growth and biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
metal polluted soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth and biomass really reduced in metal polluted soil but was increased in metals combination with urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EDTA addition enhanced Pb and Cd phytoaccumulation.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
EDTAe0
Outcome
metals (Pb and Cd) phytoaccumulatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of EDTA considerably enhanced metals (Pb and Cd) phytoaccumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–76 · show in text ↑

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid · nutrient: content · Cannabis sativaResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.