Paper · 2020 · Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Horticulture

Effect of Fertilization and Weed Management on Weed Flora of Hemp Crop

Angeliki KOUSTA; Panayiota PAPASTYLIANOU; Nikolina CΗΕΙΜΟΝΑ; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Hemp is known to have a competitive advantage over weeds. Despite its suppressive ability, weed infestation remains an important issue during the early growth of the crop. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of fertilization and weed management on weed flora and hemp growth parameters during initial growth in the 2019 season. The experiment was laid out in a split-split plot design with three replicates: three hemp cultivars as main plots, three fertilization treatments as sub-plots and two sub-sub-plots (weedy, weed free). For the computation of height and biomass weight, 10 plants were randomly selected in each plot. Weed species were collected by quadrate and density and biomass weight were determined. ANOVA revealed that all factors and their interactions significantly affected plant traits. Hemp cultivars showed different competitive ability. ‘Futura 17’ reduced weed measurement traits better than ‘Uso 31’. Density and biomass of nitrophilous weeds increased with the higher N dose compared to control (up to 56% and 79% respectively), therefore negatively affecting the growth of the hemp plants. Further research is needed in order to identify useful information on interactions between weeds and hemp crop to address potential yield losses under different weed management systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hemp cultivar Futura 17 reduced weed measurement traits better than Uso 31.

Material
Futura 17e1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed measurement traitse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
Uso 31e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weed Flora of Hemp Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Futura 17’ reduced weed measurement traits better than ‘Uso 31’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–938 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hemp cultivars differed in competitive ability against weeds.

Outcome
competitive abilitye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Hemp cultivars showed different competitive ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–872 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All factors and their interactions significantly affected hemp plant traits.

Treatment
fertilization treatmentse2
Outcome
plant traitse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weed Flora of Hemp Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“ANOVA revealed that all factors and their interactions significantly affected plant traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–819 · show in text ↑
e2

“three fertilization treatments as sub-plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Density of nitrophilous weeds increased with the higher N dose compared with control, by up to 56%.

Treatment
higher N dosee1
Interactor
nitrophilous weedse1weed
Outcome
Densitye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
56%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weed Flora of Hemp Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“Density and biomass of nitrophilous weeds increased with the higher N dose compared to control (up to 56% and 79% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass of nitrophilous weeds increased with the higher N dose compared with control, by up to 79%.

Treatment
higher N dosee1
Interactor
nitrophilous weedse1weed
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
79%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weed Flora of Hemp Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“Density and biomass of nitrophilous weeds increased with the higher N dose compared to control (up to 56% and 79% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1067 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increase of nitrophilous weeds negatively affected the growth of hemp plants.

Interactor
nitrophilous weedse1weed
Outcome
growthe2
Direction
negatively affectinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Density and biomass of nitrophilous weeds increased with the higher N dose compared to control (up to 56% and 79% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1067 · show in text ↑
e2

“therefore negatively affecting the growth of the hemp plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1129 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

nitrogen · pest · Cannabis sativaResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.